Obama Set for Trial: Forged Birth Certificate and Fraudulent Social Security Numbers
The Intel Hub
Shepard Ambellas
January 21, 2012
The day after Barrack H. Obama A.K.A Barry Soetoro took office as President of the United States (POTUS), he filed executive order 13489, banning the release of his records.
Official White House Photo
An unusual act by all means.
It has been previously reported by Rev. James D. Manning and others (interviewed by The Intel Hub) that this was an attempt to block Obama’s Dark Shady Past (and present) CIA ties, and protect his forged birth certificate from becoming widespread public knowledge.
The Executive Order reads;
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release January 21, 2009
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 – - – - – - -
PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:
(a) “Archivist” refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee. (b) “NARA” refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.
(c) “Presidential Records Act” refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.
(d) “NARA regulations” refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.
(e) “Presidential records” refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.
(f) “Former President” refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.
(g) A “substantial question of executive privilege” exists if NARA’s disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
(h) A “final court order” is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.
Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records. (a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative. (b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.
Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President. (a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.
(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified. The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.
(c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.
(d) If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates. After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President. (a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist’s determination as to whether to honor the former President’s claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist’s determination with respect to the former President’s claim of privilege.
(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE, January 21, 2009.
Now after 3 years of battle, Dr. Orly Taitz, has made some progress with her case as Judge Malihi ruled in her favor.
Obama is set to appear in court on January 26, 2012, and is ordered to interrupt a scheduled conference to do so.
Will the Executive Order signed by Obama the day after he was elected president effect the outcome of this case in any way?
To think, essentially a foreign terrorist could be at the helm of the country and right now there is nothing stopping or regulating it.
What has this once great nation become?
Replies
Lezlianne, yes I think Newt is as creepy - and I don't know what happens to his wife if the wind blows..that's going to be a scary sight..(I'm howling right now..)
Am sure there is racism, which to me explains the high black percentage of votes Obama received in the election - it goes both ways of course. However, because I don't like him - back in 08 - I got accused/questioned of being RACIST cuz I didn't LIKE him! Because I wasn't voting for him, and believe me - his color had zip to do with it..I just didn't believe him - period..and, I was right in my beliefs. OK, there may be every 'reason' of 'excuse' that he hasn't been able to do anything he promised - but - I didn't think he would and he hasn't. I have no reason to believe he will in the future either..A person running for that sort of position should already know what they will encounter as opposition up front, for the first two years it was solid control - was it not? It was..
I think he seems like a cool guy - in many fun ways..but - my personal beliefs is he has an agenda secretly to destroy America and wants to make it dependent on government.
I have to agree, other options suck big time..but would elect my neighbor - or yours - before I could cast a vote for him..
Actually, out of the possibles presented, I probably could vote for Ron Paul if we are nearing an era of peace..
Delilah..Regardless of your different opinion - I strongly respect the way your light shines through your comments..that is what is beautiful in all this. I SO hope our nation, the world, can get past this garbage thinking that just is more pollution in our world - and rise above it all. But, we are here, we haven't moved to that 5d point - and must address things as they are without ignoring..again, although there are differences, you are a tremendous example of expressing yet loving..
Well thanks Dave I appreciate that! <3
I know that we stand a better chance at Peace with someone like Obama in there -
Newt would be a nightmare!
So keep your heart open, and maybe you'll change your mind when the time comes :-)
Regardless, I know we'll be okay and we'll make it - I'll always be pulling for us, and I'll never give up! :)
Dave, I don't believe we can have peace until we have a leader who believes in it; who can help us to attain it. So you should not allow ongoing world unrest to keep you from voting for Paul. I cannot vote for him because he wants to cut back or cancel programs needed by the elderly, the children, the poor and the afflicted. I'd like to see him stretch his thinking a bit more to align with his heart.
Star Flower, who really needs to get some sleep
Would a white hat force sterilization and abortion-go to rightcoastconservative.blogspot.com /2012/01obama-orders-catholics-to-act-against.html-I know you probably think 'right wing nut job' stuff but this is a finalized regulation that 'orders' Americans to buy gov. approved health care with abortion coverage-take a look
omg, i didn't know this was a FOX news forum...seriuosly people, wtf?
I love it how all of you anti-Obama talk about love, truth, acceptance...and then add the "but". You realize that that but INVALIDATES what you have just said, right? Talking to you Mr. Ed and Marique. Really, so you don't care that maybe Obama is a Muslim...but it'a Christian nation...??? but blah blah blah...
How pathetic. Really you think thing would have been better with McCain and Sarah Palin? really? I gotta give it to you Marique: you don't really care about politics, and yet you have the need to share this story...wow, you really are quite a piece of work. I never understand how people talk about being spiritual, all loving, all accepting, and then put hp this kind of shit. go "meditate" some more. maybe this time it'll work.
I know, it's crazy lol They won't even meet him half way on things, it's just flat out no. And so many people criticize Obama because they say he compromises too much, he tries to please too many people, he should have more of a back bone. I kind of agree, but he's very much into compromise, and he takes that from Lincoln he says.
I don't really think it's racism that is a huge factor, I think it's more....people just believe propaganda...and they see some things he does and think, oh he must be a dark hat...without understanding the full scope of things. Matthew explained it well in his last message, of why Obama has to play the juggling act of white and dark balls.
And I never had good feelings about Gingrich lol I just don't sense any sincerity out of him. Something about him seems very fake.
Same with Romney, I mean clearly he doesn't care, I remember seeing a video of him talking to a woman in Massachusetts where he was governor, who was questioning him about his health care policy in the state which didn't help her at all when she needed it......and he didn't even listen to her, he just said....are you going to listen to me, are you going to listen to me, my plan was good, why aren't you listening to me....and she kept saying but it didn't help me...and he just ignored her in mid sentence and talked to someone else. Just total lack of caring for the people, there's no way this guy should be President, his intentions aren't pure at all, it's obvious it's just a career move for him, it has little to do with actually helping Americans.
Romney cut off a young journalist just last week by interrupting what the journalist was saying and rudely replied: "You're wrong! You're wrong!" And immediately walked away. In just one life-time I've had enough autocracy to last for all eternity; I certainly don't want an autocrat in the WH.
they all suck bigtime..and, obviously I'm not an Obama fan..
But, in my efforts, and I did make them to no avail, to attempt to figure any sense as to why he would sign this horrid bill on NY Eve..
I am nearing the position as being glad he did..yeah..but it's a gamble position so to speak..
I am hoping and praying that when the sheeple in this country realize what happened (cuz - as you've noticed our corporate owned news entities won't touch it) - that when people actually realize the gastopo can take you out of your house forever - There will be an uprising like NONE other here in America..Those 99%ers will look like a prayer meeting on sunday night compared to how these people will react to an act that affects their freedom of speech, everything they hold dear..
And, then he becomes the sacrificial lamb, along with all of congress. I think this is a possibility, adding huge fuel to the fire, like none seen as yet. On top of learning the truths of 9/11 (THAT will have reactions of immense proportions) and the Feds stealing..bailing themselves at our expense, and of course Obozo knows..
All this - each piece - will bring change like he promised all right..and all the lightworkers will claim 'that was the plan, he was a plant'...well, I haven't read in one message that one has to lie to be a lightworker, to be evolved, to be a 'good' guy, a white hat.
not on my clock.
Geeze, whats taking these spaceships so darn long, it's getting real ugly down here, lol..
The guy has charisma like none before him. A speech like none other before him and the ability to move people to tingles, hair raising talents..these are learned traits folks - you could learn this to.
President Obama's oratory is a Gift.
Why do you refer to him as Obozo? I absolutely KNOW that he would show you more respect.
(Heck, he'd even be polite with Mr Ed.)
Politeness doesn't cost anything. Even I can manage it 99% of the time.
Star Flower
if the president had the power you believe he does he could use the veto power he has to not sign bills, but he chose not to use those powers, why not? he even promised to use veto at least once and didnt, why not, if he was a lightworker and really had the pwer you think your vote gives you when choosing the person you believe has that power then why didnt he use that power? by believing you vote means anything to begin with means you are already duped. obama could very well be just a guy caught up in this nonsense game of control over humans, ou can believe he has a good heart all you like and it may be true, but the reality is no matter how good he is he isnt doing good things. if the people in politics mattered as you believe then it is imperative that they are good. but since they do not have that luxury it doesnt even matter if they are good or not because they will still do bad things.
if you believe that voting makes a difference then yes if you also believe that bad people are ok cause its a "tough job" then you shouldnt vote, but since your vote doesnt matter anyways go ahead and do whatever you think youre doing when voting. someone else doesnt get to dictate who or when a person should be allowed to have an opinion, those guys dont decide who has the right to vote, its more of the game saying, play by our rules to play in the game we rigged. why cant criminals vote? are they not still citizens? when they are out again are they not paying taxes and contributing to the coutnry's wealth and growth? dont let them tell you what you have the right to do, your opinion SHOULD count, but in america it doesnt they dont care what you say or think. politics is a game newt gingrich is now saying he is going after the elite, he is elite, its a game they say whatever the people shout at them back to the people and do whatever they want anyways.
you are supposed to have a representative democracy, i highly doubt 93% of americans want that detention act, which obama promised to veto and didnt, and added a clause to ensuring further nastiness ahead, i cant remember what it is right now, but he made sure some wordings were changed to include more taking away of peoples rights. the point is whether or not he is good, he is doing bad things, and if youthink its ok for bad people to be in office, assuming the govt was actually working for the people, then you shouldnt vote even though you would still be allowed to
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 10 Next