Comments

• 

  Joanna June 19, 2021 at 1:59pm

  San, that's a beautiful quote about the divine spark within, and letting it become a flame. I've seen auras since childhood...when the spark becomes a flame, the aura around someone glows brightly. It can be seen in people's fields (and was depicted as golden halos around spiritually-alight ones, human and angelic).... 💛
  
  R Lovely, I gently look forward to a profoundly cohesive and holistic post-quantum physics unfolding from the next unfoldment of human awareness, in the 'blink of an infinite I'.... 😉
• 

  Pet Rock June 19, 2021 at 12:53pm

  https://www.infowars.com/posts/smartest-man-in-america-breaks-down-...

  

  “Smartest Man in America” Breaks Down Global Elite’s Vaccine Sterilization Agenda

  Christopher Langan, who has a genius-level IQ between 195-210, breaks down nefarious vaccine agenda
• 

  SAN 不滅 June 19, 2021 at 11:17am

  cause we can 💓🌍
  https://youtu.be/4i7so9Fup5w
• 

  SAN 不滅 June 19, 2021 at 11:05am

  

  Ashtar Command Ligthship
  ~we are not alone~
  
  https://earth-chronicles.com/ufo/carlos-diaz-a-person-who-contacted...
• 

  SAN 不滅 June 19, 2021 at 10:55am

  I believe that we carry a spark of that eternal light within us, which must shine in the basics of being and which our weak senses can only suspect from afar. To let this spark in us become a flame and to realize the divine in us is our highest duty.
  
  Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 8:23am

  

  You can see then that the problem with the earlier theory is that it tried to 'explain' how a single wavefunction turns into a particle upon observation as if we can observe a single particle!!! To explain 'observation' correctly, though, we must use a multiparticle quantum system (we can only see a huge number if particles, not a single particle). In a multiparticle quantum system, the probability of finding one particle ceases to have any meaning. We reinterpret it as 'the density of particles emanating from a given point', rather than 'the probability of finding a particle at that point'. In other words Born's rule must be reinterpreted when dealing with numerous particles, such as those we can see. The original QM, though, tried to apply the Born's rule for a single particle in the context of 'observation' oblivious of the fact that we observe many, not one particle!!!
  
  Therefore the simplistic QM taught in introductory courses must be rejected when 'you grow up quantum-logically'.☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 7:28am

  

  Note that in my blog post I linked to below, I have touched on the correct way to understand 'observation' in modern QM.
  
  That understanding must always include 'Quantum Decoherence'. Any article that talks about quantum measurement without a mention of Quantum Decoherence is an ignorant article, you can savely reject it, if you want to seriously understand QM!
  
  The earlier QM theories of Heisenberg et-al did not contain quantum decoherence because they were theories of single particles. Measurement(hence observation), however must involve many, interacting particles as a measuring device must be a classic object as a human eye can only see a classic object.
  
  When a quantum wave goes near the measuring device, this wave can nolonger be described by a single Schrodinger Equation. It now mixes with gazillions of waves. This Decoheres the wave and makes it like a particle, which joins the other particles forming the clasic object and completely joins the clasic system. So you see that the wave does 'collapse' into a particle-like wave-packet as it joins the classic object. The classic object is, itself, an ensemble of such wave-packets. Since the decohered wave-packet is now like any other classic object, we can savely regard the wave function as to have 'collapsed'.
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 7:21am

  https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/quantum-mechanics-...

  

  Quantum Mechanics Of Reiki

  As you may see from the picture above, the hand is depicted holding ki, chi , energy or prana, perhaps ready to be used for reiki purpose. So chi mus…
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 6:49am

  Albertha,
  
  You are welcome☺ It is so nice to hear that😆
• 

  Albertha June 18, 2021 at 9:33pm

  You have some interesting blogs on your page Roaring Lovely, great, thanks!❤