Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comments

• 

  Movella November 5, 2026 at 11:13am

  

  When one’s spiritual light quotient is on a higher level, the desire for corruption in leadership is non-existent and deemed useless. When you embody abundance and gratitude for yourself, others and for life itself your cup is already full and corruption is not necessary. Corruption is nothing but a product of lack mentality distortion in humans, in order to fill an insatiable void due to disconnection from self. It just so happens that those with higher light quotients are rarities in this dimension, but it does not mean they do not exist.
  
  Discussions of current Earth politics can provide a false sense of comfort to some who feel they should choose a side in order to feel a sense of belonging and identity. I advise those people to self reflect on such a false sense of security, realise that you already belong as your birth right, and flip the script as most Protagonists have already successfully done.
  
  You only forgot who you really were as part of the test of life in lower consciousness, to one day find yourself and remember that true spark within, this is evolution. My potential is limitless and so is yours, but only if you choose to accept that truth for yourself.
  
  Be authentic and all that’s aligned will naturally gravitate towards you. Don’t be lead into a false sense of security by the very political structure designed by the dark to keep you trapped. This is precisely what my future ascended self warned us about. Those who choose to stay trapped for much longer can do so out of their own free will. On the New Pathway, The Protagonists will be the first to open the door for a mass collective ascension. ✨
  
  If anyone is still unsure, I will repeat that debates about current Earth politics carry a dark astral energy, deliberately influenced by the black lodge to stall spiritual evolution and keep your vibrations low in a never ending spiral, and of course Earth politics never reaches a peaceful conclusion so the debates continue, all by design. To keep your mind occupied. The total opposite of joy and freedom. To hell with their system, they will never control us. We’ll show them what true power looks like, by lived example for the first time ever in human history. The Protagonist way.
  
  Debates on current politics are not only becoming increasingly predictable, but are beneath The Protagonists, we have learned what we needed to know, seen and exposed the trap for what it was, and risen above it. I look down on the current political puppet show with laughable predictability mixed with pity. Rise above it. The only focus directed at politics should be not from a frequency of fear and frustration (which is what they want), but instead a frequency of will and empowerment. Know that with focus and determination we can in fact control the entire system from a place of empowerment, for the good of all. But in order to reach this level if you haven’t already, you must release your own fears and find your grounded stability and joy within, connect to others with high vibes, connect to the creator and spirit. Then you can share outwardly. This is service.
  
  If linear time is an illusion and in the future we already ascended, and we’re travelling all around the universe on ships, knowing that you already reached your highest potential and that dreams can in fact come true…
  
  How would you act Now?🪷
  
  👑
• 

  enigmabfd November 5, 2026 at 9:59am

  And since you like Plato:
  
  AI quote
  ---
  Plato’s Republic is a philosophical dialogue about justice and the ideal society. Its central figure is Socrates, who discusses with others what it means to be just—as an individual and as a citizen.
  
  In the ideal state, people are divided into three groups according to their abilities: philosopher-rulers, guardians or soldiers, and producers. Justice exists when each group performs its proper role. Plato also argues that philosophers, because they seek knowledge and the good, are best suited to rule.
  
  One of the work’s best-known passages is the Allegory of the Cave, which shows how people may mistake shadows for reality and how philosophy can lead to knowledge.
  ---
  
  Interestingly the word "Republic" is not a good translation of the greek word "Πολιτεία". It literally translates as "citizenship".
• 

  enigmabfd November 5, 2026 at 9:55am

  Great feedback as always Drekx, interesting how we shared the same thoughts at the same time with different wording!
• 

  enigmabfd November 5, 2026 at 9:52am

  

  I can relate to your plan but I would like to add two major points.
  
  1. Lack of critical thinking. Let's face it, not everyone is capable of critical thinking. Such people rely on rules and processes to remain socially functional and accepted and only care about their everyday quality of life.
  
  AI quote
  ---
  Rough practical estimate for a median Western adult population:
  
  Basic functional reasoning (everyday logic, simple evidence evaluation): common, likely a majority.
  
  Strong/proficient critical thinking (consistently spotting fallacies and biases, updating beliefs with evidence, resisting misinformation, handling complex arguments, intellectual humility): typically estimated in the 10–25% range, heavily concentrated among the more educated, higher-cognitive-ability, and certain professional groups.
  ---
  
  This naturally leads to three models:
  a) A revealed, authoritarian ruling class (tyranny, theocracy, dictatorship, marxism etc)
  b) A secret ruling class with a libertarian veil (secret lobbies/deep state etc + democracy, communism)
  c) A self-sustained community of like-mind critical thinkers (lack of infrastructure, tech, military etc)
  
  2. Corruption. The more someone stays in power, the more corrupt it gets. This rule applies to both non-critical and critical thinkers, which commonly engineer even more elaborate ways to take advantage of their seat. Even if a good critical-thinking leader does manage to emerge from a system, unless he/she is an extremely strong idealist, corruption will eventually take over.
• 

  Drekx Omega November 5, 2026 at 9:41am

  

  I will not be drawn into the minutiae of current politics, which is but a reflection of the current state of human consciousness, but I would like to mention the two main philosophical divides, as expressed by the wise ancient Greeks, who, as my modern Greek friend; enigmabfd, mentions, invented the concept, while understanding it's flaws, for abuse, too...
  
  These are the main points of differences, over this matter and I agree that they both have merit, The contrary views about democracy, between Plato and Aristotle. So a question I presented to AI and gleaned this response:
  
  "Plato viewed democracy as a dangerous form of mob rule driven by ignorance, whereas Aristotle viewed it as a flawed yet potentially workable system that could be redeemed and stabilized.
  
  Plato’s View of Democracy
  
  • Suspicion of the Masses: In works like The Republic, Plato rejected democracy because he believed ordinary citizens lacked the deep education, reason, and philosophical training required to rule wisely.
  • Path to Tyranny: He famously ranked democracy near the bottom of political regimes (just above tyranny), arguing that the chaotic pursuit of unchecked freedom inevitably breeds demagogues who manipulate the public and pave the way for tyranny.
  • The Ideal Alternative: Instead of democracy, Plato advocated for rule by philosopher-kings—an elite guardian class possessing true knowledge of the Good. (Note: In his later work, The Laws, Plato softened slightly to explore a mixed constitution, though it remained far from standard democracy.)
  
  
  Aristotle’s View of Democracy
  
  • Classification of Regimes: In Politics, Aristotle categorized constitutions based on whether they served the common good or the rulers' selfish interests. He viewed pure democracy (where the poor masses rule purely in their own self-interest) as a defective or deviant form of government.
  • Utility and Stability: Unlike Plato, Aristotle saw practical value in democratic elements. He recognized that people naturally desire equality, and giving citizens an equal voice makes the state much more stable, reducing the risk of violent class revolutions.
  • The "Polity": Aristotle championed a practical middle-ground system called a polity (a constitutional government blending democracy and oligarchy), anchored by a large, stable middle class that balanced the extremes of the rich and the poor. Rather than utopian philosopher-kings, Aristotle trusted the rule of law and institutional equilibrium."
  
  ------------------------------------------------------end quote...
  
  My opinion is that both views have merit, as well as drawbacks and each must decide which serves the divine impulse, more aptly, as anything else is simply illusory, and laced with many human, low consciousness glamours...I will also suggest that spiritual Monads may be "equal," but individuals, expressing in physical forms, are not....Different light quotients and different IQs, differing karmic situations and that should be taken into account, when designing a true representative system...and why the world needs a theosophical educational program, that clarifies all that has been hidden...as to make a choice, one must be furnished with all the facts..and many voters are not..
  
  𒀭Ω...𒀯𒆕𒋛𒊓
• 

  Sirian Starlight November 5, 2026 at 6:06am

  

  To add to this...
  
  "So, what to expect and what can really be done to counter all this, I do not know.. What's the point where manifestation is enough and when would divine intervention become necessary and at what cost?
  
  Not sure if I would consider myself a light worker but I feel the only part I can actually do is try and support the local community in practical and emotional ways."
  
  Well, this related series of questions has two answers.
  
  Divine intervention requires putting into public consciousness, the idea that democracy must evolve to active, rather than passive status for we the people.
  
  Manifesting it, will happen once we reach the point of critical mass.
  
  As for protecting and activating a smooth transition period, the cost of doing this, will not involve as much risk, as it would adaptation to the removal of risk by majority rule.
  
  Once that's achieved, we go through this in stages that won't be too jarring along the way through a step by step plan.
  
  1. Market into public consciousness, the idea that representative democracy has led to a loss in election integrity. This is easily proven with countless examples, by personal experience, and is very well received today.
  
  2. Establish a political framework that involves a redesign, of how modern day tools can effect in a positive way, the way in which we the people lead our government, by the tools available to us to vote on key issues backed by our national identity. We start by including more public civil servants into the discussion, and gradually role this out to everyone over a series of stages where law enforcement, then all government staff, then private companies, then the general public gets access to voting tools. Especially ones, that go through your employer payrolls and minimize fraud, by making sure you've paid all your taxes for that year, and that you're a full and legal American citizen by birth, and only have absolute residence in America, with all your paperwork in order, up to date, in good standing, and that you have not been arrested in the past 10 years for criminal activity.
  
  3. Once that's in place, we roll out unanimous rule. This way, we get rid of majority rule to enact laws on its own merit, to prevent issues of erosion tampering with a systematic restructuring of how we as humans can come together in a way that gets things done, only when we're in agreement to come to the table and act like adults. We do this, by ensuring personal experience has supporting evidence as to why a law must be introduced, versus just saying that there's a problem and we only find out the aftermath when a new law gets pushed through without due process through we the people.
  
  After that, we start cleaning up the mess old laws left behind by removing any part of the framework no matter how small or large, we unanimously agree, no longer serves us for tomorrow's benefit. In this way, once we're clearing the way to vote together directly, we've done all we can do to minimize remote interference.
  
  As for personal interference, well, that's what debate is all about. And in a free society, opinions will only stick when backed by personal experience of people living through those points of view with their livelihoods attached to their representation when leading by example, or showing that there's one to be seen.
  
  When we minimize the bureaucracy while maximizing the checks and balances simplicity has over due process, we restore lost integrity to the process of putting our voice to the creation of a new, shared legacy. I think through all levels of government, this could be the most direct solution to challenges our future won't have to face, if we use sovereignty like a tool, and prosperity like a goal.

  http://mass.As/
• 

  Sirian Starlight November 5, 2026 at 5:10am

  

  I guess spiritual transformation has to start with two underlining realities working in tandem alongside each other.
  
  1. That we the people, are indivisible by who makes us empowered on this planet to be ourselves.
  
  2. That this indivisibility is the basis for equal treatment under mutually beneficial laws, not just laws that benefit mutual interests.
  
  By establishing this into something a little more sacred than just a rule book, like...a set of inalienable rights for instance, you make sure any appeal process follows guidance by action, in a way that does not leave truth untold.
  
  Separating truth from a lie, in a democratic system, needs more people looking at issues and having their own acknowledgement recorded on where they stand overall.
  
  And you're right. We can't be truly democratic, if we're only being represented in part, by people who spend the majority of their time, in and around other representatives, and not the everyday person when it's just you and that other person standing in a room together.
  
  And that's the point. Because the majority of people get their media through direct access. And, when that perspective is shared to trusted contacts, they look for a reason to support how media bridges the gap between idea, and ideal.
  
  Only after that gets established, does someone come in in our current system, and say they purport to take that exact mindset to a body of other people, who may or may not ultimately stand by it. Instead, they would rather stand by the remote game of telephone being played out in real time, as we the people move on about our daily lives. While in exchange, we the representatives of we the people, get together to represent, everyone around themselves and in the process, earn a living by farming votes.
  
  Yes, there is a flaw in this system, which exploits passive trust. Rather than renewing, active trust by how relevant actions are taken through mutual benefit, or laws surrounding it.
  
  Interests, as a result, aren't benefits. They're portals by which benefits appear. And, because of this, yet another representative fills that gap, because of intel only a few are privy to. and this works in our favor when there's safety in numbers, but against us when those numbers don't align to the active trust we're placing in our livelihoods carried in part, to the law table.
  
  The reason I believe direct democracy is useful for us, is because I'm not trying to attack how people really think on issues. That's going to at some point, be spoon fed to you based around how society currently structures itself in terms of acceptable movements, because they're popular. Versus ones that don't rely on a populous, to keep them going forward.
  
  When you represent someone, you accept passive trust no matter what. But when you actively speak for your own experience, and can back it up with others proving their own with actions, not just word salad. Now you have laws that get tested in real time, before any casualties appear. And so, a parliament for the modern day you can join from your home in your spare time, sets a very real precedent, for taking time to collectively offer yourself for virtual jury duty in a way, physical jury duty never could compete with 250 years ago, when this concept was born for America.
  
  And that's the point. Laws made to govern today, were done using tools 250 years ago were seen as essential for the then needs of people looking to join a country that wouldn't do them, what kings in the past tried to extort out of their own populous. enough to just, pack up and leave, and never return through the tool and portal of colonialization, as opposed to the duty of representing, its imperial nature for a despondent and unruly distant kingdom.
  
  Every time throughout human history the limits of kingdoms were tested, it was through active battle versus what you got as a trade off for being part of what the battle stood for, in your own life.
  
  This is no different in a civil way here and now, because the battle turned inward, not outward. And it is one, that has not been fought alone. We just think we're on our own to fight our portion of it, because we're only as strong as the majority rule accepts us to be.
  
  But, that's only ever true, when minority rule works against us. Which systematically, ensures that the outcome we are looking for, aligns to more of us, who keeps this vision alive, than to others that have not fully had their point of view matured into being heard by everyone present. And so this leaves me with one question.
  
  Why should we settle for agreeing to disagree, when that work just isn't complete yet to a full agreement before being carried forward as such?
  
  Ultimately, the answer lies in how we make laws matter. Both majority and minority rule are two sides of the same, passive, flaw. An unencrypted connection between law, and order. As opposed to an encrypted connection, of ordered laws.
  
  Which, when strengthened by those who empower them, require participation of ideas of our time, that do all in our power, to stand by their own merits through us, while working for us in turn. And that distinction matters, because you're only ever counted as a minority, when you're excluded from a non mutually beneficial law. Where absolute and only absolute unanimity binds mutual interests together, until it doesn't.
  
  Currently, when a law gets introduced, changed, or scrapped, it works through direct amendments rather than a process of removal, where its unanimity gets recorded as it was for it to be included at all, backed by personal experience.
  
  That's what's missing from our system of law and order now, as the final pieces of how laws are meant to serve us and how we're meant to uphold them in kind.
  
  When laws work this way, through direction, we the people don't talk to or get orders from a middle man. Because we're our own in that context. And it remains democratic, because the rule of law is an absolute majority, not a guaranteed minority in part. Where, debates on important issues will always include minorities to express themselves to get a majority, then to achieve unanimity when a refined law for all, works based around this need.
  
  As for fighting the weaponization of these movements, from within or otherwise, the ones that seek to undermine sovereign principles, based on non mutual benefits, we must seek out an active rather than a passive renewal of our representation, to make congress span the entirety of our collective for good and bad.
  
  When elections are tampered with, and votes aren't counted properly, or something happens where we're facing hardship based around decisions trust eroded. all we can do, either in meditation, or in person, is fix the erosion, by turning hurt into hope.
  
  We do this, by aligning our interest, alongside our presence and only then, can active participation backed by personal experience, seen through events collecting alternatives of how these would look like, find the best root forward for all who are here now to explore them in kind.
  
  Active trust works like an encryption key. In that it renews expired authorizations, like a term limit that's internal, and only valid between you the person, and we the people of a particular common identity. It is these keys which I believe, are the solution to returning the same lock in all of us, rather than fitting a new one every so often.
  
  It's not perfect, but it would solve some of the issues we face now with people feeling like they're losing more than they're gaining. And, if it addresses the mood in the room, before the room creates a new mood without our being apart of it, we can truly find peace from within a lot easier than we would if it were undermined by our passive trust in those who were not aligned by our direction in this way.
  
  I love you guys. I just want the best of our ascension efforts to come to fruition.
• 

  enigmabfd November 5, 2026 at 12:03am

  

  My two cents and adding up to Sirian's posts,
  
  Democracy, whether representative or direct, has the exact same basic flaw. It's a Greek word that reads "rule of the people" and in it's original form not everyone had the right to vote; each man (not women or "slaves" at the time) was considered the representative of his family. In any case, it was based on patriotism, culture and education, until corruption and manipulation kicked in..
  
  The election system is overwhelmingly broken as is for at least two reasons I can name; social engineering and no accountability. There is no way for people to overthrow or block a political group after it gets elected. Even if an elected group radically changes its agenda from day one, no one can really do anything about it for the few following years, especially if the judicial system is being controlled. This system has been fine-tuned throughout history to today's state to support the ruling class.
  
  So, what to expect and what can really be done to counter all this, I do not know.. What's the point where manifestation is enough and when would divine intervention become necessary and at what cost?
  
  Not sure if I would consider myself a light worker but I feel the only part I can actually do is try and support the local community in practical and emotional ways.

  Buy class.so | Spaceship

  Own class.so today. Secure checkout and guided transfer support. No hidden fees.
• 

  AlternateEarth November 4, 2026 at 11:51pm

  Jon -check out what the AI says about progressive policies;
  https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/chatgpt-gives-grim...

  

  ChatGPT Gives Grim Depiction of US Cities in 50 Years Under Democrats, Compared to Beautiful Future…

    With Democrat policies over the next 50 years, cities would be overrun with crime and homelessness; however, a future implementing Republican polic…
• 

  Sirian Starlight November 4, 2026 at 9:39pm

  

  I guess this leaves me with one question.
  
  To all light workers and way showers out there...
  
  What part of our living reality are you transmuting here and now to the vision of that which you want to be apart of in full presence as you are embodied into it, contemporarily so?
  
  Manifestation can come from any direction...not just timelines, but faith from within experienced as its own spirit of commemoration we don't let die. For that's how parallel realities in my experience, to my knowledge, actually are born from the enactment of.
  
  A lot of us spend so much time embodying an energetic presence in other densities, we forget to give our love to this one. and, I feel for this place because I'm here, and we're here talking about how better it is elsewhere. We could embody a presence of fractal understanding here, too. If we simply cared enough to try. And subconsciously, a lot of us do this work because we believe in a better here, even if we express and see it as...a heaven away from here.
  
  But I still think we can redirect even that energy to a more favorable outcome where the world we're apart of, belongs to we the co-creators of it, and it's not as much of a jump from there, through the still alive energy of the resurgence of the conservative movement we have today, because a living purpose is already established. As it would be, to live through yet another 4 to 6+ years of 2 election cycles, where change hinders upon the growth of those interested in representing it...as opposed to those building its representation.
  
  One thing I do know, is that tyrannical chaos is the exact kind of energy that prevents ascension in material form.
  
  We came so far, and to just...lose sight of that...I don't know what to say. Our hope for envisioning change is not lost.
  
  You guys inspired me all throughout covid, and supported me through that dark time that the very same people elected now to recreate without a care for how we live through events they make us on both sides of the isle go through, because so much of the old guard remains without any ascension energy going towards alternative alignments.
  
  That said, not all the lessons we supported back then are meaningless now. That's all I'm saying.
  
  There's a better path, I just think we have to know how to reach its believers who used others as a ladder to get to such a point in their own time. Rather than enforcing it too soon or too late otherwise.
  
  We can do it without running the risk of getting attacked physically...if we're strong in our spiritual faith, and committed to helping each other through interference seen and unseen.