Krishna Kalki, personally, I've never observed 'walls' between dimensions...I see and experience 'dimensions' as fluid and interweaving bands of frequencies, and available depending on what 'band widths' we're vibrating in/with....and we can be/are continuously interacting with(in) multiple dimensions simultaneously, in a multidimensional existence... :)
How is 'densities' relevant to states/dimensional 'bandwidths' beyond physical, that have no actual *density*?
'Seventh density', for instance, just doesn't work for me... ;)
I've never heard from Star Family/Inner guidance to use 'densities' instead of 'dimensions'.
Obviously, our language can be very inadequate to trying to describe states beyond physicality in a contrast-based experience, where our language systems are based in duality...'this or that'...rather than 'yes, and'....
But of course, if you resonate with densities instead of dimensions, go for it! Just realize that all such terms are limited, when we're attempting to describe that which is meta-physical, infinite, eternal...and we're all just doing our best, with what we've got on this earth plane... :)
We can use all of them, to highlight various aspects. For instance, they can already use 'frequency' alongside 'dimensions'. (I have adopted 'frequency' more than 'dimension').
I bet 'density' will be the best if you want to apply quantum mechanics in say 'the quantum mind' or 'quantum healing', for instance 'reiki'. The chi or ki, if understood as 'of lower density' has a chance to be a quantum coherent 'superfluid', because quantum decoherence is never 100%. So there is indeed a very less dense fluid that pervades everywhere! This has a good chance of being the 'chi'!
Exactly!! 'Dimension' is some of the greatest misnomers in new-age. I have repeatedly tried here to teach otherwise, but not even a single person echoed it! This is the first time I here someone here questioning this BS term.
'Another dimension' cannot possibly mean 'another layer of reality'. This is a totaly bulshit usage of the word 'dimension'. Nobody, for instance, can possibly be 'in the fifth dimension'. The best he can be in is that 'one of their dimensions is a fifth dimension'.
But why this, impossible to believe idea? Furthermore, physicists have ruled out the 'existence of large dimensions other than the 4'.
(Note; I seldom post any of bens blogs anymore because of its negativity but he does have access to info few have access to. Keep an open mind and use discernment, for he is a gray hat but sometimes we need to see things differently. Be in this…
"OK.. my apologies to you Movella for mistaking your comment asking how I treated my clients, with your fathers comment, yet with all the comments flooding in at that time span and it was late at night I responded so I must have got It confused, with…"
"I agree, no more posting of YouTube channel, "PCC- Space," as it's what one could describe as a feedback loop....They are watching what we say here and adding our ideas and data...then mixing it all up into a confused soup..
"No problem Andro!😊 We already know the actual information from here on AC anyway..
Like AE said, some of these fake channels might even be getting some ideas from us."
"This YouTube channel ‘PCC- Space’ is rubbish, it says that same disclaimer on all of the vids because they are all AI generated.. Sorry guys, I would advise you all to stop following that channel."
Replies
How is 'densities' relevant to states/dimensional 'bandwidths' beyond physical, that have no actual *density*?
'Seventh density', for instance, just doesn't work for me... ;)
I've never heard from Star Family/Inner guidance to use 'densities' instead of 'dimensions'.
Obviously, our language can be very inadequate to trying to describe states beyond physicality in a contrast-based experience, where our language systems are based in duality...'this or that'...rather than 'yes, and'....
But of course, if you resonate with densities instead of dimensions, go for it! Just realize that all such terms are limited, when we're attempting to describe that which is meta-physical, infinite, eternal...and we're all just doing our best, with what we've got on this earth plane... :)
Blessings, Joanna 💛✨
I bet 'density' will be the best if you want to apply quantum mechanics in say 'the quantum mind' or 'quantum healing', for instance 'reiki'. The chi or ki, if understood as 'of lower density' has a chance to be a quantum coherent 'superfluid', because quantum decoherence is never 100%. So there is indeed a very less dense fluid that pervades everywhere! This has a good chance of being the 'chi'!
'Another dimension' cannot possibly mean 'another layer of reality'. This is a totaly bulshit usage of the word 'dimension'. Nobody, for instance, can possibly be 'in the fifth dimension'. The best he can be in is that 'one of their dimensions is a fifth dimension'.
But why this, impossible to believe idea? Furthermore, physicists have ruled out the 'existence of large dimensions other than the 4'.