Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 8:23am

  

  You can see then that the problem with the earlier theory is that it tried to 'explain' how a single wavefunction turns into a particle upon observation as if we can observe a single particle!!! To explain 'observation' correctly, though, we must use a multiparticle quantum system (we can only see a huge number if particles, not a single particle). In a multiparticle quantum system, the probability of finding one particle ceases to have any meaning. We reinterpret it as 'the density of particles emanating from a given point', rather than 'the probability of finding a particle at that point'. In other words Born's rule must be reinterpreted when dealing with numerous particles, such as those we can see. The original QM, though, tried to apply the Born's rule for a single particle in the context of 'observation' oblivious of the fact that we observe many, not one particle!!!
  
  Therefore the simplistic QM taught in introductory courses must be rejected when 'you grow up quantum-logically'.☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 7:28am

  

  Note that in my blog post I linked to below, I have touched on the correct way to understand 'observation' in modern QM.
  
  That understanding must always include 'Quantum Decoherence'. Any article that talks about quantum measurement without a mention of Quantum Decoherence is an ignorant article, you can savely reject it, if you want to seriously understand QM!
  
  The earlier QM theories of Heisenberg et-al did not contain quantum decoherence because they were theories of single particles. Measurement(hence observation), however must involve many, interacting particles as a measuring device must be a classic object as a human eye can only see a classic object.
  
  When a quantum wave goes near the measuring device, this wave can nolonger be described by a single Schrodinger Equation. It now mixes with gazillions of waves. This Decoheres the wave and makes it like a particle, which joins the other particles forming the clasic object and completely joins the clasic system. So you see that the wave does 'collapse' into a particle-like wave-packet as it joins the classic object. The classic object is, itself, an ensemble of such wave-packets. Since the decohered wave-packet is now like any other classic object, we can savely regard the wave function as to have 'collapsed'.
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 7:21am

  https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/quantum-mechanics-...

  

  Quantum Mechanics Of Reiki

  As you may see from the picture above, the hand is depicted holding ki, chi , energy or prana, perhaps ready to be used for reiki purpose. So chi mus…
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 19, 2021 at 6:49am

  Albertha,
  
  You are welcome☺ It is so nice to hear that😆
• 

  marker dragon June 18, 2021 at 6:52pm

  Indigenous, I feel that now. Everything comes from darkness. We need to embrace and balance darkness to defeat it. Everybody has this power
• 

  Indigenous Alien June 18, 2021 at 6:45pm

  What if tomorrow we wake up and everything has changed, no more darkness, just an overwhelming sense of compassion and unity that lifts us up? What if?
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 18, 2021 at 6:09pm

  "Roaring please make a blog or discussion about your beloved topic QM.
  I understand nothing of it! It sounds so complicated!"
  
  Good!! Yes, QM is very complicated. I saw pple often post and talk about it here and I thought they were interested with it, and understanding it fairly well. I believe that what underpins it is relevant to UFOs, that is why I wanted to bring it here but first, after demystifying it off the 'tree-in-the-forest' reasoning. We must also first debunk the Copenhagen interpretation and show its inadequacy!
  
  I have written several blogs that contains some lessons in QM. I have explained reiki, immortality etc using QM! They are there in my blog.☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 18, 2021 at 5:28pm

  

  Lets discuss about QM, politics, God, ETs, UFOs etc and ignore our CHARACTERS. The latter is both boring and useless!!
  
  Why do anyone care about my character? I am not your wife, child, husband or whatever. I don't leave with you. So my character is not worth the space in this wall. I am not that important!!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 18, 2021 at 5:21pm

  Lectures suck, marker dragon. I hate them very much! No one here has shared with me their beleifs, especially about the topic I came here to discuss.
  
  According to your beleifs, how do you think scientists observe an electron??
  
  I have insinuated such questions an no one answers. Which is not a problem. If they did, I will respect their opinion! There is no beleif here shared with me, about QM, for me to respect!! I only get boring lectures!!! My character, not my opinion came on the table! And this is what I don't respect!! I don't respect lectures!! Maybe this is the source of confusion:
  
  Lecture me even a bit, and I will treat you with contempt!!!
• 

  marker dragon June 18, 2021 at 5:12pm

  Hi Albertha. If I respond, I do it because I want to. The least I like what someone says, the more I at least consider it internally. I always try to get to a point of mutual respect. When someone is unable to respect others beliefs, I think it is important enough to discredit this. I obviously stopped the healthy debate because it was not healthy. When somebody is consumed with fear and ego based reactions, we all have a responsibility to at least try to plant a seed that may save those people from themselves in the future. Godspeed! By the way, not reacting does not change a lack of respect. Just saying.