Replies

• 

  1 darkstar September 9, 2013 at 4:03am

  happy person:  Thanks for the wonderful video.  I will be sending it out.
• 

  Malcolm September 9, 2013 at 2:21am

  The real scientific proof that 9/11 was an "inside job" is from Professor Steve Jones, who scientifically proved the presence of thermate (a variant of the demolition explosive thermite) and similar construction demolition explosives per spectroscopic analysis. U.S. government scientists (most who have refused to give their real names) have used "the art of words" to call Jones a fraud and the spectroscopic proof (done by separate third parties AND by Jones himself) as "subject to error." Here's the spectroscopic analysis (which is the same analysis used by forensic scientists working for high level law enforcement agencies) and an essay on thermate:

   

   

  The left graph is microsphere particles collected from the WTC collapse. The right graph is thermate itself, which is a variant of thermite and an explosive used in constructed building demolitions. Notice any real differences?

  Thermite: Theories that Aluminothermic Materials Were Used to Destroy the Twin Towers

  The idea that thermite or similar preparations were used exclusively or in combination with other methods to destroy the Twin Towers remained unexamined for several years after the attack, despite its merits.

  Aluminothermic reactions are exothermic chemical reactions in which aluminum is oxidized while an oxide of another metal is reduced. Although high temperatures are required to initiate such reactions, they are easily self-sustaining once started due to the heat they generate. The most common example of an aluminothermic reaction is thermite, in which powdered aluminum reacts with an iron oxide. Because aluminum has a greater affinity for oxygen than iron, oxygen is transferred from the iron oxide to the aluminum, releasing a great deal of energy and leaving behind molten iron and aluminum oxide.

  Professor Steven Jones has noted that a number of features evident both before and after the falls of the Towers fit the theory that thermite was used. These include:

  • A spout of orange molten metal seen just before the South Tower's fall in videos of the Tower's north face around the crash zone
  • Reports of molten metal in the remarkably hot rubble of Ground Zero
  • High levels of metals found in aluminothermic incendiaries -- such as manganese, zinc, and barium -- in samples of World Trade Center dust
  • Remains of the Towers' structural steel showing severe corrosive at... involving sulfur
  • Minute solidified droplets of previously molten iron in samples of World Trade Center dust
  • Pieces of active nano-engineered aluminothermic chips in samples of World Trade Center dust

  LINK

  Thermite Variant

  Basic thermite preparations can be modified and augmented in various ways to change their properties. The fineness of the aluminum powder determines the speed of the reaction. The use of ultra-fine aluminum powder gives the reaction an explosive quality, resulting in 'super-thermites'. The addition of sulfur in preparations called thermates enhances the ability of the reaction to cut through steel.

  Findings reported in Appendix C of FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study seem to fit the thermite theory remarkably well.

  Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel. ... The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.

  Because there are many possible types of pyrotechnics that exploit the energy-dense thermite reaction, the architects of the World Trade Center demolition might have relied entirely on such materials to attack the structures in several different ways, as is suggested by this hypothetical blasting scenario.
  • 

    1 darkstar > Malcolm September 9, 2013 at 4:04am

    Malcolm:  Thanks for the info.