You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
Posted on 02/24/2026 by EraOfLightGreetings to You! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am KejRaj!You are closer to the shift than you can imagine. Do not measure it in days. Do not search for it on a calendar. Time, as you have known…
Posted on 02/23/2026 by EraOfLightMany of us are acutely aware by observing the accumulative effects of the Bifurcation cycle, in which a point of divergence has occurred in the perception of reality and the energetic chasm is growing wider…
The Healings For Enlightenment, Divine Mastery, & Ascension Processes By Steven Hutchinson ...Welcome back beautiful souls. I'm happy to start sharing with you again a new series of healing videos that I have channeled to help each of you live…
Abundance Is A Love Echo From Maya Of The Pleiades MAYA SPEAKS: The Abundance BoomerangHello, luminous human!Here I am again, Maya from the Pleiades, waving at you from a dimension where nobody has alarm clocks and nobody says, “Ugh, Monday.” We…
"🏂Enjoy some snow boarding, AE.....and maybe practice with skis....?? ⛷....Snow boots, gloves, ski goggles🥽 and balaclava helmet, 🧤a must....🛷..Think winter Olympics....🏆....But most important to keep warm...🥶🔥"
"I could build an igloo-it's great packing snow! Great for snow ball fights!"
Replies
"A set of beleifs that attempts to connect humanity to spirituality"
Science on the other hand is just objective knowledge.
It is easy stated than done. A real coffee time is how do we obtain this objective knowledge. It is here where 'scientific method comes' in. Because scientific method is a method ultimately done by a fallible human being, science can never fail to have its own shortcommings. It is here where science can ultimately bear the hallmark of a religion.
Science has realy never been done as simply observation and deductions. If it were so, indead it could stear away from religion. Modern scientist simply doesn't do that. He rather begines by making an hypothesis based on how he thinks the universe works!! This was clearly done by Darwin, Einstein, String theorists, Inflation theorists, Supersymmetry theorists etc. Our guy then DEDUCE the inevitable consequences of his theory, (which he calls it by a fancy name, 'prediction') then goes out to look for evidences that matches the prediction, phew!
You gotta be able to smell from far that this method is 100% identical to 'religion'!! Our scientist is gonna use the prediction to INFERE that his otherwise unobservable factors are infact true. But what is the difference btwn this and a theory of god?? The example of unobservable factors are:
i)The extreemly slow evolution
ii)Field
iii)wavefunction
iv)fundamental particles
v)curved spacetime
vi)Dark matter
vii)Fourth dimension
viii)26 dimensions
ix)Big bang
x)Black holes
xi)inflation
the list is endles. Ergo in this sense science IS a religion!!
Thanks for understanding this subtle fact. Science have ended up claiming that they can chew buble gum and yet you smell croundnuts.
"A scientific claim is not to be taken by faith but must be open to questioning and critizisism"
But what does it mean to talk of a last man standing battle when only a single guy is allowed in the ring??
TRUE SCIENCE
It must train students to learn how to reason for themselves. To know how to seive sense from nonsense. Or in short, to become the true scientists that they are preaching about. But only the church, as in Jehovah witness, fear to bring the magazine of say the Seventh Day Adventist to their church. This unambiguously shove the chameleon of science squarely under the folder of religion.
Yes, science ITSELF is a religion.