Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comments

• 

  Hellen May 30, 2021 at 10:58pm

  I always like listening to Dean Whiggington's video he is exposing the dark forces agenda yes, it will get worse.
• 

  marker dragon May 30, 2021 at 8:57pm

  Roaring Lovely, I love your persistence. WE do not have to agree. I love getting another intelligent and conscious perspective
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 6:51pm

  

  Maybe to elaborate abit. Lets say Tokyo is in my consciousness. I need an air craft, or something like that, that is also in my consciousness, to get there. Lets say Cairo isn't in my consciousness. Then I need an aircraft etc that isn't in my consciousness. In both cases, it is equally difficult to get the aircraft! That one is 'in my own consciousness' does not, in anyway, help to ease anything.
  
  Now lets say some 'magics' can happen and merely wishing for a jet comes about. If the jet is in my consciousness, then fine. If the jet is not in my consciousness, then perharps my wishes emits some forces that manufacturers the jet from aether.
  
  So what difference does it make? We should only talk of what can or cannot happen, regardless whether or not, the world is in our consciousness!
  
  Talk about UFOs and you now hear of such! If you have to board a metalic car to get to places on earth, then same will apply to a trip to andromeda even if andromeda is just in your own head! No need to invork this nonsense of 'andromeda is just in our minds' only when it comes to UFOs and ETs!
  
  We still need to understand physics and build technology to get to stars even if 'they are all in our heads'. That is the verdict!
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 6:24pm

  Marker dragon,
  I was not addressing your comments in the last four or so posts. So I did not insinuate that that is what you were talking of.
  
  I am aware of solipsisms and pantheisms that pple in this site have so idolized yet it makes no difference pragmaticaly speaking!
• 

  marker dragon May 30, 2021 at 5:44pm

  I am not talking about acts of God. We are all Gods. Manifestation is everything. Physics only exists as a whole if collective consciousness manifests it.
• 

  Teresa May 30, 2021 at 4:09pm

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dPOtBH_BR4&t=3s
  Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, May 29, 2021
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 1:32pm

  

  In modern times, we are privileged to understand how something can be there without being seen. Gamma ray is one such. But we also know that objects are as much rays as photons are! So objects can be invisible via a behaviour similar to a shift in bandwidth.
  
  Light pass through a glass, but infrared don't. Just a change in wavelength causes what looks like a total change in all characteristics! A change in wavelengths turns soot to diamond! In other words from an opaque thing to a transparent thing! It can, of course, proceed to turn it into an invisible thing entirely!
  
  As you think carefully, you will understand that there are layers of earth that are interlaced on the same spot! The concept 'new earth' might as well reduce to a 'new experience' that leads us to see a planet that was, infact, always there with us!
  
  But I am not talking of new age like subjective nonsense. It is objective. It is not 'in the eyes of the beholder'.
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 1:27pm

  Yes, I cut it from verse 9-10.
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 1:04pm

  "9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him."
  
  If you use 'gamma ray' instead of 'light', it is even more apt as gamma rays can be there without you realizing them! Yet gamma ray is just the same light but of a higher frequency!
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 30, 2021 at 12:57pm

  

  Though some will indeed see 'acts of God' as compatible with 'acts of nature', the concept 'nature' have, nevertheless been defined to exclude some things. Rays from the sun is seen as 'natural'. But neutrinos from the sun seem not be taken that well! So I can say 'light from God', and pple will smile or node. But if I say 'neutrinos from God', people will now say 'Is this a real thing emanating from God'? or something like that!
  
  The only reason is that 'neutrinos' etc are often heard amongst 'intellectuals', and the modern religious/ spiritual guy has opted to be antagonistic to intellectuality all together because modern intellect have often been used in an attempt to make God etc seem irrelevant. But it was not always that way! Also 'light' is in the bible but 'gamma rays' is not. The careless guy opt to say that if you likened God to a gamma ray, then you are reading bible like you would, a physics textbook. He forgets that the bible used 'light' because that was the ray known to people at then!