The Flat Lander (problems with general relativity)

Gravity have been a coffee time for physicists for a long time. One day, they tried to solve it once and for all: we are 3 dimensional bedbugs hopelessy trapped in some cosmic tissue paper. So gravity is simply beyond our imagination.A mathematician is a guy who will tell you that if he is holding 10 oranges in his left hand and then some other 10 oranges on his right hand, then when he put all of them to his mouth, he will be having a total of 20 oranges in his mouth! He can prove to you that cheatahs can never overtake tortoises and even that 2=1. Needless to say, if we hire such a guy, obviously divorced from reality, to be a spokesman of nature, we will only conclude that nature is absurd!The following question, which eludes mathematical physicists, is what you will need to answer to form a quantum theory of gravity. What does physical constrains got to do with constrains in our imaginations? Try this experiment: crawl under your bed so that you can only move along a 2d trajectory. You realise that this does not prevent you from imagining where your mendula oblangata is situated!A flat bedbug, no matter how flat the guy is is still an 100% 3d guy 'crawling under the bed'! Donnot be cheated. At what point as we keep flatening the bedbug do he suddenly loose the idea of the hammer on top of his head while he can still imagin perceiving a 1 d scenario? You realise there is realy no such a point. There is no bridge from the 3d such as a 2d. We either have a full 3d bedbug capeable of imagining all the 3 axi or we donnot have a bedbug at all! There is no in between!What does it mean if a planet happen to move along an elyptical trajectory because it is constrained in some way by some unfathomable hammock? The problem is that we can't imagine to whence the planet should otherwise go. So it can't be the question we are asking. When we say why does the moon orbit the earth, we mean why doesn't it escape tangentially like a sling. If we could not conceive the tangential direction, then we would not be in a position to even ask the question in the first place. Therefore the unfathomable hammock is an anwser to unknown, unfathomable question, leaving our question unanswered!However, let us still asume that it answers any question. So we say that the moon is stopped from moving to a direction that we cannot even imagine where it is. So if we cannot imagine 'there', then it cannot go 'there'. So our imagination is closely related to the forces that can stop the entire moon from going somewhere, if not our imagination itself that is infact constraining the moon! The best way to explain is if the moon is just a product of our imagination!This is exactly my point when it comes to pointing out the incompleteness of GR. As a classical theory, as opposed to a quantum one, it still pretends to treat observers as irrelevant in physics. We are somhow looking at the universe from a bird angle perspective and yet strange enough, we can't even imagine this point of view!A bed bug traped to walk along the surface of a cube even illustrate my point all the better. Lable the four conners of the cube ABCD. The bedbug can only imagine 2 axi. However, as it circumnavigate the cube, strange things certainly happen on the corners of the cube. It starts from A where it can imagine the horizontal axis but not the vertical axis. However, reaching B, it cease being capable of imagining the horizontal axis and then begine being able to imagine the verticle axis etc! But strange enough, he does not realise these dramatic changes in imagination.Clearly, the corners of the cube or the cube itself is somehow acting on the imagination of the flatlanders! This then is how I conclude that GR is incomplete. It is both a physics and a psychologic theory and yet it has only focused on the physics part! It should include the equation specifying how the curvarture of the manifold acts on the flat lander's imagination at that point! There is no better way for the manifold to do this than if it is itself a brain and the flatlander's brains are inherited from the manifold.

"There are obviously many things wrong with China-but look at this lock system;
https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/peopleandplaces/riding-china-s-scar..."

"Lol it’s the classic parliamentary gamble isn't it? But once you lose the public's trust on national security, having blind faith rarely works. You can’t mess with the basic duty of a nation and expect to keep your majority."

"LOL-
Prime Minister: Mette Frederiksen
Her party: Social Democrats
🗳️ 1. She called an election

Frederiksen triggered a national election (basically a nationwide vote for parliament).
🪖 1. A major controversy (defense / national policy issues)

Her…"

Spiritual Blogs

The Flat Lander (problems with general relativity)

Comments

Latest Blog Posts

Message from commander Valiant Thor. The Timeline War and the Trump Paradox; Frequencies of the Future [videos] Starship Earth: The Big Picture.

Divine Union, Within and Without; By Jenny Schiltz | Source.

Ivy and Drekx Discuss The Knights Templar and Biblical Ark of The Covenant

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Blog Posts

FINALLY THE NEW PAPA SAID IT ! Killing Easter lamb has no basis in the Christian tradition

How Many of These 51 Spiritual Awakening Symptoms Do You Have?

find out if you are a star seed and where you really come from tests.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

Your Power Of Being Present By Mary Magdalene Through Natalie Glasson

The Violet Flame in Action: Embodying Your I Am Presence 🪻Melanie Beckler

Remember - Emotions Without A Story Are Like An Actor Without A Stage

A World in Transition: The Awakening Within Us By Tori Cota-Robles

Note: this page contains paid content.