The Dimensionality Of The Universe

How many dimensions are they there? Well, in the 19th centuary, if you did not say 3, then you were not a smart mathematician. In the early 20th century, if you did not saiy 4, you were ignorant of Einstein's theories. In the latter 20th centuary, if you did not say 11, you were ignorant of string theory. But the modern 21st centuary answer is that it doesn't matter what you think the number of dimensions are!To understand what I am saying, consider the Minkowsky and Einstein's claim that our universe is 4 dimensional. There arises the question that why then do we perceive only 3 dimensions? The now obselet answer was that we are limited beings and only a 5 dimensional being can perceive the world as it is. The lower dimensional beings perceives but an illusion. The modern answere is that the world can as well be just 3 dimensional and if there is a being perceiving 5 dimensions, then the extra two are just illusions. The world AS IT IS is as it appears to a 3 dimensional person!!!This idea may first sound uncomfortable to you if you don't understand it but it isn't! Just be carefull to grasp it very well. If someone asks WHERE the devil is, a Christian etc of the early 20 centuary would nolonger hid the devil somewhere below the earth because men can circumnavigate the earth. When asked where God is, he could nolonger hid him somewhere above the blue sky because 'we move around the sun'. So he sought to hid these guys in 'other dimensions'. But not so any more because mathematicians have shown that we are in those 'other dimensions' as well! One better way to hid God in 20st centuary is once again, up there in the blue skies!! Everything is IN PRINCIPLE, visible, somethings are only hiding but IN CONCEIVABLE LOCATIONS!It is this way: lets say you are seeing a cup and a billiard ball infront of you. The cup might be in the 26th dimension and the ball might be in the fifth dimension but you are seeing both of them in the 3rd dimension! So there is nolonger any place to hid anything we wish to beleive. One way, for instance, to hid ghosts is to say they leave far far away, say in andromeda. In other words, we are back to saying that God is in heaven, high up there. However, fortunately there is another way; interlaced realities. Not only is interlaced realities compatible with modern ideas, it is infact the basis of those ideas!!The modern brewer of whiskies would say that a UFO was seen up there in the sky. Then when asked where it went to, he will say it disappeared to 'another dimension'. New math now demonstarate that this joker card claim is just like saying the devil is beneath the earth or even worse! If the UFO happen to go into 'another dimension', it will still be seen on earth!! It will appear like shifting slightly to the left say by a distance of Planck's length and voila! 'It has gone to another dimension'. If there is a fift dimensional guy (who will just be standing next to you but not invisible) his picture of UFO shifting to the 5D will add or perharps subtract only cosmetics to the picture, but not more or less information. So there absolutely no advantage of perceiving the world in more dimensions. If anything, there might be disadvantages.So modern informed UFOlogists nolonger say the UFO flew to another dimension when they want to sound scientificaly apt. To sound scientific, you explain the disapearance of a UFO by something like: the UFO's matter turned into weakly interacting particles. The only way a thing can seem to disappear from the sky is if its atoms somehow stop interacting with the photonic field but not by 'going to another dimension'. Granted, you may redefine the word 'dimension' to mean such but be carefull when trying to use string theory to support such. To look informed, use HOLOGRAPHIC MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE.An holographic universe is an example of interlaced realities where every portion of the hologram interlaces information about other portions. To extend the hologram to serve the same purpose as a multidimensional reality, one only need to notice that just as we can interlace all the points along a third axis on the same point on an hologram, we can similarly interlace all the points along a 26th axis on the same point of an hologram! So even a 2 dimensional hologram can serve the purpose that a 26 dimensional multivers could serve!!! The key point here is that what is important is the amount of storage space and not the orientation of the axi. Then in giving us 3, the universe granted us with a great bonus of an extra axis! Asking if there are other axi other than the 3 is nolonger of any importance either to a scientist, an engineer or even, as you have seen, a spiritual person. As a by the way information, if you look through a 2d hologram, you will see it has a third diemension! Similarly, a 26d guy could see the very same hologram and see all the 26 dimensions that might be there as well!Those who like evidences, the first evidence that narture indead interlace realities is huge space between particles. Then there is some regularities here and there. Find an hollogram and zoom it to see the patterns. Does it look like some atoms in say a crystal? If yes, does that show that atoms could be images in an hologram?

Hermann Minkowsky was the mathematician who convinced physicists to think that the world is 4 dimensional. Even Einstein took a while to swallow this.

Now many have troubles in understanding that Minkowsky was not saying that time axis is an orientation in some unfathomable space. Specifically, he was not endorsing eternalistic model of multiverse. His idea is understood by analogy. When we talk of speed of an object, we can talk of v=x/T, x=distance, T=proper time. So we talk for instance of a point particle passing along x at a rate compare to T. But also we can talk of t/T where t=coordinate time. (t/T=time dillation). So considering the symmetry between t/T and x/T. As compared to T, t is behaving just like x. We say a point in some clock is passing along t at a rate compared to T. So thanks to the common denominator, T, we can now talk of 'passage along time axis, t' in the same way we talk of passage along space axis, x. We measure the rate of both passages using a clock, T. Thats the relevant insight. We need no diagram even if we were 4 dimensional!!

Posted on 04/27/2026 by EraOfLightBlessings Beloveds~Many have felt the uneasiness in the field as the May energy shift approaches. Sleepless nights, mystical sensations, and an inner knowing that the acceleration is about to speed up yet…

"There are so many topics to discuss on this thread and I can cover most, but often return to politics, as it does have a presence of value and should not be simply ignored, to discuss ancient history, cosmic life and esoteric topics...There are…"

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Comments

Roaring Lovely June 5, 2015 at 1:23pm

I forgot to add that in a blackhole, t would be zero but T would not! So when one say time stops in a blackhole you should understand the clock stopping like any other thing stoping. I.e you should have in mind some other duration, T, so that t is zero with respect to T. Don't try to understand a case of no time at all as this is not what the theory is saying.
Roaring Lovely June 5, 2015 at 1:10pm

Hermann Minkowsky was the mathematician who convinced physicists to think that the world is 4 dimensional. Even Einstein took a while to swallow this.

Now many have troubles in understanding that Minkowsky was not saying that time axis is an orientation in some unfathomable space. Specifically, he was not endorsing eternalistic model of multiverse. His idea is understood by analogy. When we talk of speed of an object, we can talk of v=x/T, x=distance, T=proper time. So we talk for instance of a point particle passing along x at a rate compare to T. But also we can talk of t/T where t=coordinate time. (t/T=time dillation). So considering the symmetry between t/T and x/T. As compared to T, t is behaving just like x. We say a point in some clock is passing along t at a rate compared to T. So thanks to the common denominator, T, we can now talk of 'passage along time axis, t' in the same way we talk of passage along space axis, x. We measure the rate of both passages using a clock, T. Thats the relevant insight. We need no diagram even if we were 4 dimensional!!

This reply was deleted.

Spiritual Blogs

The Dimensionality Of The Universe

Comments

Latest Blog Posts

The Sword, May Field Shift, & David Wilcock’s Passing; By Sandra Walter | Source.

Kelly and Drekx discuss the destiny of non-ascendees

Travelling On The Astral Plane With Spiritual Purpose - Dreamscapes

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Blog Posts

FINALLY THE NEW PAPA SAID IT ! Killing Easter lamb has no basis in the Christian tradition

How Many of These 51 Spiritual Awakening Symptoms Do You Have?

find out if you are a star seed and where you really come from tests.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

The Violet Flames For Our Enlightenment And Ascension On Earth By Steven Hutchinson

Violet Flame: Embody Your Light With Tori Cota-Robles

The Inner State That Shapes All Experiences

Way of the Heart | 1Hour Handpan Music | Johann Immanuel

Note: this page contains paid content.