"If anything ever 'collapse', then it is just our knowledge"EinsteinIt is ridiculus that people think that it is the tree-in-the-forest reasoning that quantum mechanics teaches when it says that the act of observation determines the outcome of quantum measurement. The secreat to this lack of understanding lies in never developing an habit of relating facts to theory, if not begining from facts to theory instead of doing the vise-versa.TREE IN THE FOREST LUNACY: When no one is seeing a billiard ball, then it does not exist!Whenever you see anyone in the 'fanny farm' of gang of idiots claiming that this is what quantum mechanics teaches, then know at once that you are dealing with one of the mental patient and not one of the doctors, even if he is wearing the doctor unifoam! The reason why this cannot possibly be what quantum mechanics teaches is pretty straight foward: it demands that one sees the scenario of the billiard ball without seeing it!QUANTUM MECHANICS:Supposing quantum mechanics teaches that the act of observation does infact create the billiard ball. The question that should always ring like a bell inside a sane brain is, how do we verify such scientificaly? The only way is that there are many types of observation. You can, for instance consider your friend (the famous 'Alice' and 'Bob' of quantum mechanics) observe the ball and see if he is going to create the ball. Normally, a laboratory measuring device plays the role of this 'friend'.What Aspect's experiment shows is something like this: supposing you see a table from a distance and find that there is no biliard ball there. You then get near it to see clearly but voila! A white ball apears. You turn around and voila! The ball turns black. You close your eyes and then opens them but voila! It disapears. You can conclude two things from such observations:1) Acts related to observation, such as changing perspective, viewing distance, etc does infact changes what we are observing.2.)The brain of the observer itself is the thing that is changing. In otherwords, it is all hallucination, or failure to see all aspects carefully, on the part of the observer, in every perspective.The details of Bell's theorem, which we will next see, is about how to rule out the second conclusion. Notice that this is dramatically different from the religion that new age tries to peddle around this. In the latter, there is no need to rule out 2 as they conclude that the whole world is itself just an hallucination. However, what quantum mechanics teaches is that it is not just the observer who is moving around the table who is seeing the changes. A distant observer, who is just sitting and watching the whole show sees that the ball do infact change as the other observer changes his perspective. In otherwords according to quantum mechanics, what is happening is OBJECTIVE and not just phantasms in the mind of the perceiver. This also makes it straight foward to note that what QM is saying cannot possibly be happening in classic world. This is simply because we don't see anyone perform such accrobatics as moving mountains by merely taking a turn and looking at them. On the other hand, the tree in the forest reasoning, which suppose that such miracles are happening in the macroscopic world, albeit with nature having done a huge conspiracy to hid it from us, is a speculation that has utterly no basis in science.BELL'S THEOREMFortunately, Bell's Theorem is extreemly simple to understand. The reason why you will find even a string theorist ignorant of it is that the theorem was worked out very late in history. People tend to have this mistaken assumtion that a problem solved the latest must be the most difficult. After all how could it have eluded all the past geniuses. I mean quantum nonlocality was though by Bohr and Einstein spent over 30 years deeply thinking about it. But these 'geniuses' tend to overdwell on 'big issues'. No one can imagine that the solution is in boyish like tilting of crystals! Ergo we can understand how small things can elude giants.As we will see by, Bell's Theorem can also help in sudying such phenomena as telepathy and other 'paranormal' claims. By subtituting brain for measuring instrument, we are also going to see how to use the brain to persue scientific studies, a thing that scientists are yet to be very accustomed with. So we are realy going to create lots of miracles with a single magic wand!Perharps polariscopes, crystals, photons etc that are studying by 'Alice' and 'Bob' are too boring for a spiritual person. So in place of polariscopes, or Stern Gerlach apparatus, I am going to regard the brains of Alice and Bob as valid measuring instrument. So our version of Aspect's 'experiment' will be done by these aparatus:1.)Alice2.)Bob3.)Chameleons4.)Beer5.)Glass ballThe aim is to investigate if:1.)Alice and Bob can change the color of the chameleon by merely looking at it.2.)Both Alice and Bob and/or the two chameleons are in a telepathic connection.Supposing both Alice and Bob are clairvoyant crystal gazers. So we are not seeing the chameleons that they are claiming to see inside some glass ball. But we wish to investigate the objective reality of such. In this sense, both the brains of Alice and Bob are acting as the measuring devices that detect for us the photons or the electrons, which our eyes cannot detect. These detectors reveal to us the otherwise hiden quantum world, just like Alice and Bob would reveal to us some unseen 'astral world' or something like that.We soon notice that something remarkable happens. The chameleon that both Alice and Bob sees inside the ball changes color from blue to green in a random way. However, we notice that every time Alice says that she sees a blue chameleon, Bob also claims that he is seeing a blue chameleon too even if Bob and Alice are in two different rooms and we can be sure that they are not communicating in any normal way. However, when we remove the crystal ball, non claim to see anything. Ergo we can savely conclude that the information about the chameleon is indead comming from the ball and not from the heads of these guys.Now let Alice gulp some two bottles of beer. We notice that the synchronicity is nolonger perfect. For every hundred views, only 75 matches. Naturaly, we tend to blame Alice for this. Probably the beer interfered with her ability to judge the color. We notice that same thing happens when Bob drink the two bottles. However when both of them drink the beer we find that the number of instances when their testimony is coherent is only 35 in hundred tries.We arive at a puzzle. Though the chameleon together with its changing color has proven to be objective, not only do the beer, to some extent, determines the color of the chameleon, when Alice drinks the beer, it also determines how the brain of Bob will change the color of the chameleon even if Bob is miles away! It is not that by drinking the beer Alice misjudged the color. She ACTUALY changed the color of the chameleon and also changed the color of the photon right in Bobs brain by simply drinking the beer herself! In other words when Alice drinks the beer, the sober Bob who is miles away begines to see pink elephants as if the beer made him drunk too! Such wonders are exactly what Aspect's experiment demonstrates!It is not that the mere knowledges of Alice, Bob and us 'collapses'. Reality itself does infact 'collaps'!
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Copyright Policy: Always Include 30-50% of the source material and a link to the original article. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. If you believe that someone's work has been copied and posted on Ashtar Command in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please Contact Us and include the links to these pages and relevant info. 

Latest Activity

Love & Joy posted a discussion
  How To Let Go Of Your Emotions By Melanie Beckler A practical method to start practicing letting go is presented in David Hawkins' book, “Letting Go” which you can refer to for more details. The key points of the method are as follows:Awareness:…
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Well that's OK bro....You tried your best and hit the limit you could manage....64-hours falls short of the ideal 72, but, still a great start....You will find that the more you do these longer fasts, the better you will get....When I started these…"
9 hours ago
Agarther Z left a comment on Comment Wall
"Hello Drekx, I had to break my 3 days fast cycle after about 64 hours, because I felt weak had no energy and begun to sweat, but anyway it was a great experience, over and out LOL"
10 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Music for your soul.
"Well, it sure is better than the Eurovision Song Contest...LOL
Back in the 1980s, they had more taste, as I'm more keen on scantly-clad female dancers, rather than (yuck) men....and strange woke demonic people..

Legs & Co dance to Bobby…"
10 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"And when you hear the robotic voice on my vids, it sometimes incorrectly mispronounces my name, as "Drek-ex,"...(albeit, should not be two syllables)
It should correctly be pronounced as "DREXX." One syllable...In ancient times, before the great…"
11 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"OK people, time for a musical break.....Relax and enjoy, the groove....👏🏻🌞

(The original version was being played by a DJ, in the Woodbridge-Bentwaters AFB (officer ranks) staff disco, during the Rendlesham incident of 1980, when Lieutenant Col.…"
11 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Music for your soul.
"A remix of the Rodney Franklin classic, from 1980..."The Groove." 👏🏻🌞
The Groove (Remastered) ·
FTG Presents The Vaults Vol.4, ℗ 2017 Sony Music Entertainment UK, Released on: 2017-04-07

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6f3xBpS24o"
11 hours ago
Drekx Omega replied to AlternateEarth's discussion FrankenSkies documentary exposes the chemtrail agenda and its effects on life on Earth
"Every deep state project has an inner and outer purpose...."Climate change" is peripheral..the inner and deeper purpose is this:

Chemtrails are secret attempts by elite earth humans to deflect certain bio-transformative cosmic rays from reaching…"
14 hours ago
More…