Quantum Nonlocality: Aspect's Experiment = The True Test Of Quantum Theory

"If anything ever 'collapse', then it is just our knowledge"EinsteinIt is ridiculus that people think that it is the tree-in-the-forest reasoning that quantum mechanics teaches when it says that the act of observation determines the outcome of quantum measurement. The secreat to this lack of understanding lies in never developing an habit of relating facts to theory, if not begining from facts to theory instead of doing the vise-versa.TREE IN THE FOREST LUNACY: When no one is seeing a billiard ball, then it does not exist!Whenever you see anyone in the 'fanny farm' of gang of idiots claiming that this is what quantum mechanics teaches, then know at once that you are dealing with one of the mental patient and not one of the doctors, even if he is wearing the doctor unifoam! The reason why this cannot possibly be what quantum mechanics teaches is pretty straight foward: it demands that one sees the scenario of the billiard ball without seeing it!QUANTUM MECHANICS:Supposing quantum mechanics teaches that the act of observation does infact create the billiard ball. The question that should always ring like a bell inside a sane brain is, how do we verify such scientificaly? The only way is that there are many types of observation. You can, for instance consider your friend (the famous 'Alice' and 'Bob' of quantum mechanics) observe the ball and see if he is going to create the ball. Normally, a laboratory measuring device plays the role of this 'friend'.What Aspect's experiment shows is something like this: supposing you see a table from a distance and find that there is no biliard ball there. You then get near it to see clearly but voila! A white ball apears. You turn around and voila! The ball turns black. You close your eyes and then opens them but voila! It disapears. You can conclude two things from such observations:1) Acts related to observation, such as changing perspective, viewing distance, etc does infact changes what we are observing.2.)The brain of the observer itself is the thing that is changing. In otherwords, it is all hallucination, or failure to see all aspects carefully, on the part of the observer, in every perspective.The details of Bell's theorem, which we will next see, is about how to rule out the second conclusion. Notice that this is dramatically different from the religion that new age tries to peddle around this. In the latter, there is no need to rule out 2 as they conclude that the whole world is itself just an hallucination. However, what quantum mechanics teaches is that it is not just the observer who is moving around the table who is seeing the changes. A distant observer, who is just sitting and watching the whole show sees that the ball do infact change as the other observer changes his perspective. In otherwords according to quantum mechanics, what is happening is OBJECTIVE and not just phantasms in the mind of the perceiver. This also makes it straight foward to note that what QM is saying cannot possibly be happening in classic world. This is simply because we don't see anyone perform such accrobatics as moving mountains by merely taking a turn and looking at them. On the other hand, the tree in the forest reasoning, which suppose that such miracles are happening in the macroscopic world, albeit with nature having done a huge conspiracy to hid it from us, is a speculation that has utterly no basis in science.BELL'S THEOREMFortunately, Bell's Theorem is extreemly simple to understand. The reason why you will find even a string theorist ignorant of it is that the theorem was worked out very late in history. People tend to have this mistaken assumtion that a problem solved the latest must be the most difficult. After all how could it have eluded all the past geniuses. I mean quantum nonlocality was though by Bohr and Einstein spent over 30 years deeply thinking about it. But these 'geniuses' tend to overdwell on 'big issues'. No one can imagine that the solution is in boyish like tilting of crystals! Ergo we can understand how small things can elude giants.As we will see by, Bell's Theorem can also help in sudying such phenomena as telepathy and other 'paranormal' claims. By subtituting brain for measuring instrument, we are also going to see how to use the brain to persue scientific studies, a thing that scientists are yet to be very accustomed with. So we are realy going to create lots of miracles with a single magic wand!Perharps polariscopes, crystals, photons etc that are studying by 'Alice' and 'Bob' are too boring for a spiritual person. So in place of polariscopes, or Stern Gerlach apparatus, I am going to regard the brains of Alice and Bob as valid measuring instrument. So our version of Aspect's 'experiment' will be done by these aparatus:1.)Alice2.)Bob3.)Chameleons4.)Beer5.)Glass ballThe aim is to investigate if:1.)Alice and Bob can change the color of the chameleon by merely looking at it.2.)Both Alice and Bob and/or the two chameleons are in a telepathic connection.Supposing both Alice and Bob are clairvoyant crystal gazers. So we are not seeing the chameleons that they are claiming to see inside some glass ball. But we wish to investigate the objective reality of such. In this sense, both the brains of Alice and Bob are acting as the measuring devices that detect for us the photons or the electrons, which our eyes cannot detect. These detectors reveal to us the otherwise hiden quantum world, just like Alice and Bob would reveal to us some unseen 'astral world' or something like that.We soon notice that something remarkable happens. The chameleon that both Alice and Bob sees inside the ball changes color from blue to green in a random way. However, we notice that every time Alice says that she sees a blue chameleon, Bob also claims that he is seeing a blue chameleon too even if Bob and Alice are in two different rooms and we can be sure that they are not communicating in any normal way. However, when we remove the crystal ball, non claim to see anything. Ergo we can savely conclude that the information about the chameleon is indead comming from the ball and not from the heads of these guys.Now let Alice gulp some two bottles of beer. We notice that the synchronicity is nolonger perfect. For every hundred views, only 75 matches. Naturaly, we tend to blame Alice for this. Probably the beer interfered with her ability to judge the color. We notice that same thing happens when Bob drink the two bottles. However when both of them drink the beer we find that the number of instances when their testimony is coherent is only 35 in hundred tries.We arive at a puzzle. Though the chameleon together with its changing color has proven to be objective, not only do the beer, to some extent, determines the color of the chameleon, when Alice drinks the beer, it also determines how the brain of Bob will change the color of the chameleon even if Bob is miles away! It is not that by drinking the beer Alice misjudged the color. She ACTUALY changed the color of the chameleon and also changed the color of the photon right in Bobs brain by simply drinking the beer herself! In other words when Alice drinks the beer, the sober Bob who is miles away begines to see pink elephants as if the beer made him drunk too! Such wonders are exactly what Aspect's experiment demonstrates!It is not that the mere knowledges of Alice, Bob and us 'collapses'. Reality itself does infact 'collaps'!

"Yikes, it seems contradictory.. If you ask AI, if anyone other than Sen. Luna reported the Wilcock "death," you get:

"As of April 22, 2026, there has been no official confirmation from law enforcement, the coroner, or David Wilcock's family…"

"Well, my AI question suggests that he died..."20 April 2026 (age 53 years)" Didn't the Senator Luna, suggest this also...??

"Rep. Anna Paulina Luna tweeted about the author’s death on X: “We just learned of the tragic passing of David Wilcock. We…"

"I saw that address -my AI says he lived or lives near there -he most important part (this is where people get misled)
Authorities have NOT officially confirmed the identity of the deceased
Wilcock’s family has NOT publicly confirmed his death
The…"

Spiritual Blogs

Quantum Nonlocality: Aspect's Experiment = The True Test Of Quantum Theory

Comments

Latest Blog Posts

Hoax? David Wilcock’s ‘Suicide’ Is The Latest In A Pattern: They’re Silencing The Truth-Tellers

THE LEVINGTON TIMESLIP INCIDENT

Benjamin Fulford Report: East West reach peace agreement following defeat of Khazarian Mafia; By Benjamin Fulford | Source.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Blog Posts

FINALLY THE NEW PAPA SAID IT ! Killing Easter lamb has no basis in the Christian tradition

How Many of These 51 Spiritual Awakening Symptoms Do You Have?

find out if you are a star seed and where you really come from tests.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

Way of the Heart | 1Hour Handpan Music | Johann Immanuel

Align With Your Highest Timeline With Melanie Beckler

Divine Time & Your Reality By Steven Hutchinson

Loving Yourself - A Radical Transformation ?

Note: this page contains paid content.