Adaptation Is The True Mechanism Of Evolution

We begine by noting that indead your entire body came from a single cell, the zygote just after the fertilization. The whole process that happened inside the womb is still an evolution albeit a faster one. In this sense growth and evolution are perfectly compartible. Everything in this universe undergo changes and the idea that indead we might have evolved from a single celled organism is plausible. This is not the Darwinistic, mechanical dogma though (though aparently Darwin never intended to create dogma).Modern biologist is not after understanding. That is not the reason he dives into such questions as 'the origin of life'. Originally though, it was curiosity that was the rocket and the fuel that propels science. Nowadays it is forcing the universe to fit a mechanical world view that is the bread and butter. The modern scientists presumes a blind universe in the fundamentals wherein the mind emerges accidentaly. But there is never a priori reason to presuppose anything and then stubbonly get nailed to it. Such blinds people even more than religion does. One should rather swing to and fro, viewing the universe from all angles.It is not then a surprise that they offer what is rather a wishy washy for explanation of origin of life. Though natural selection might explain why a car with bad wheels are not on the road, it cannot explain why the well designed ones are on the road. Forced to explain the latter, it turns out to be a red herring. It turns the attention from the existent, well designed car, to an imaginary, poorely designed one so you may not much contemplate on the origin of the former car. If it is not understanding at all that was the motive behind the non-explanation, then the wishy washy bone will still keep the dogs running.But I will illustrate a more empirical problem with natural selection using analogy. Supposing we say that the principia mathematica was not written by an intelligent being at all. Lets say it was written by mad monkeys typing the keyboard randomly and then printing it out. Lets assume that when the monkey manage to type the correct sequence, some mechanism ensures that the copy is retained. Otherwise the printend out paper is discarded to dustpin. Then after zillions of a random type, lets say the monkey succeed in typing out the whole principia. There is something we expect to see though. We espect to find a mountain of waste papers of unimaginable size in the dustpin. But we don't! We don't find lots of fossils, showing badly designed beings on their way to forming another stage. The number of fossils is simply not large enough to allow for trial and error of blind events.EVOLUTION AS GROWTHA true scientists need only to suggest understandable model. He does not fear giving room for a mind that is active in nature. He only fears a model that does not agree with evidence. Ergo I don't have to explain mind away. We can take it at face value that at least sometimes, the universe behaves like a mind and just happen to somehow 'know' the correct move.So again lets compare evolution from sigle celled animal to a multicelular one with the growth in the womb. In both cases I would like you to not that non of them necesitates more information in the DNA!! We can suggest evolotion as a type of growth that happens in the 'womb' of the earth! This mean that evolution is no more accidental than growth. Both are biological processes, that require carefull conditions to be in place, sorts of metabolisms. Evolution does not involve creating more information. All the information pertaining to your body are always all already in a single cell! Extend the same reasoning to the evolution of DNA itself. It is an holographic parking of information.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

enigmabfd left a comment on Comment Wall
"Interesting question, wasn't aware of the story. This is the most accurate reference I found:

---
Quintus Curtius Rufus, Historiarum Alexandri Magni 4.3.25–26

English translation from Latin (John C. Rolfe, Loeb Classical Library):

Moreover, the…"
14 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes enigmabfd , some fascinating data about the ancient Greeks and Persians, in battles, such as that of the Athenian soldier, Epizelus...
I suspect some form of manifestation of aetheric energy, such as levels of plasma, a fourth state of physical…"
15 hours ago
enigmabfd left a comment on Comment Wall
"Interesting Greek legend/story that may relate to "MELAMMU"

AI section
----
Question:
Tell me about the legend of the bright being that fought alongside the Athenians in the battle of Marathon.

Response:
The main legend matching your description…"
15 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
17 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"That's an interesting article, Movella."
17 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's video
"𒀭𒈹..As a follow on from my post of 7th November at 1:44pm, the Sumerians used several differing words for what we describe as LIGHT, including the fifth dimensional manasic light; 𒈨𒉈..."melam.".....They also used star symbolisms such as the…"
20 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's video
"𒅲𒃻𒀝𒃻𒁶𒁶𒈠 Translated literally from Sumerian, it means: "An incantation of the innermost heart, crafted from the heart."...Or "tu šagak šag dím-dímma."

"In ancient Mesopotamian magic, tu₆ (incantations) were highly structured formulas spoken by…"
yesterday
Drekx Omega left a comment on Music for your soul.
"Another Chance🎷🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎷𒈨👏🏻😎

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhastgVxFHM"
yesterday
More…