What if everything you´ve been told about Stonehenge is a lie, and I mean everything?
We can definitely conclude with much certainty that no space aliens built Stonehenge.
According to the official version of Stonehenge, the Establishment and Mainstream Media version, Stonehenge is supposed to be 1500 years older than the Druid culture and cultures existing in England in the time Stonehenge was supposed to have been built.
Yet one of the earliest known pictures of Stonehenge to my knowledge, were not taken in the age when colour photography was invented, which was well known in the 1800´s and the 1900´s and even the late 1700´s!!!!
Here is a famous black & white picture from the year 1920 supposedly showing men at work ´excavating the site´of the ´supposedly ancient Stonehenge Monument´.
You´ll probably agree with the official version of Stonehenge - that this ´ancient Monument´is over 2000 or whatever many years old, x y or z.
It´s as if they´re actually creating them from molds!
Before 1920 Stonehenge was not talked as much about as it is today - look at this picture.
It´s existence was well known though in the late 1800´s, especially the 1880´s period.
It depicts a Stonehenge which I feel is built far closer to the present period than the Establishment would like us to believe.
The famous film that made everything nuts about Stonehenge is of course Halloween III, depicting Stonehenge rituals designed to make men and women in Halloween suit seem scary to youngsters.
When you look carefully beyond the background in this famous Stonehenge picture, you notice that many or perhaps most of the other famous Stonehenge Stones, are appearently nowhere to be found!
That´s right, just look a little bit farther from the picture and you get my point.
If it was as easy to create the Holocaust as people like me have concluded it was, why should it have been any less easier to create Stonehenge?
If the Mainstream Media and the Establishment require there to be a Stonehenge, designed to work like a Moon and Sun calculator, built in a time when everyone thought that the Moon was for real, why not do it?
I wouldn´t be surprised if the Stonehenge Project was hushed up very much in this period, and if it involved the financing of some of England´s richest and wealthiest architecture companies, and individuals with the knowledge and the tools required to build Stonehenge.
Unlike the Pyramids at Giza, the Great Stones of Stonehenge look like they have been placed there sometime in the 1910´s or the 1920´s, rather than 2000, 20000 or even 200,000 years ago.
The official version of events says that the ´ancient Stonehenge Monument´is so old that it´s age cannot be determined properly - perhaps politically properly rather than ´accidentally not properly´.
Why cannot the age of one of the supposedly oldest monuments of the world be confirmed by institutions such as the Smithosian Museum when it´s no problem for them to officially confirm the age of dinosaurs and fossils of beings having existed even far earlier than that?
Why does Stonehenge have to be one of the least properly dated monuments on this planet?
Knowledge that Stonehenge was built in the 1800´s would demolish the official version of Stonehenge and the claim that Stonehenge is thousands of years old, or even hundreds of years old.
The uniqueness of Stonehenge as a monument would disappear instantly, and people would realize anyone can build a Stonehenge in a big enough backyard.
Most Megaliths do not look like Stonehenge when it comes to determine their age, which usually turns out to be excessively old compared to Stonehenge.
Unlike Stonehenge, in the case of most of them when pictures are taken of them being excavated, all associated Great Stones are located at exactly the same place as the excavated stones.
Yet in the 1900´s and late 1800´s pictures, the Great Stones in the case of Stonehenge, seem to be missing!!!!
HOW THE HELL CAN THESE STONES BE MISSING IF STONEHENGE IS SUPPOSED TO BE THOUSANDS OF YEARS OLD?
It is indeed true that Stonehenge is built upon a site whose energy can be used to drive remotely controlled cars and so on, but this does not prove one bit to me that Stonehenge is actually thousands of years old.
There should be early drawings, early pictures of Stonehenge in ancient manuscripts and books, and appearently, it seems to me there are none!
Note that on this picture, if Stonehenge was indeed over 3000 years old, the Stones seen from the air in the picture taken in the year 1906, would be there, all in number.
Here it looks like that work on the creation of Stonehenge, has begun sometime between the early 1800´s, the 1700´s and something like that rather than in the year 3000 BC.
This is one of the famous Japanese Underwater Pyramids, supposedly over 10,000 years old.
IF THIS PYRAMID IS OVER 10000 YEARS OLD AS OFFICIAL HISTORY NOW ACCEPTS, WHY THE BLOODY HELL DOES STONEHENGE LOOK LIKE IT´S ONLY A FEW HUNDRED YEARS OLD?????!!!!!??????????????????
Here is another view of the famous Japanese Underwater Pyramid Complex.
If Stonehenge would be the oldest monument in the world it´d look like, and feel like it was the oldest monument in the world and there would be no buts about it.
Yet it looks to me like it was built far closer to today´s eara, than the Establishment would like us to believe.
It´d make sense that rich investors were not as rich during the early days of Stonehenge as they are today, and thus it´d have taken a later time to slowly build from molds and then erect by the passing of time, each new stone.
I am not s******* you. Stonehenge is one of the latest, in my opinion, and not oldest Monuments ever built in the history of man on Earth.
Here is a recently discovered depiction of Stonehenge, supposedly from the year 1440. I am inclined to disagree with the people who are exciting themselves over the drawing because it doesn´t remind me the slightest of the 1800´s Stonehenge paintings.
I hope I have been of some use here in exposing the Stonehenge Conspiracy.
The supposedly 1440´s drawing looks suspiciously modern in my opinion and the line to the right does not strike me as the drawing being from the 1440´s. What if this drawing is a fake and was made in today´s time rather than in Stonehenge´s ´ancient history´as the Mainstream Media would otherwise have us believe?
One of the lies the Establishment wants us to believe about the creation of Stonehenge. Note how the modernized Stonehenge looks nothing like the one being excavated in the 1920´s pictures and the Stonehenge looking like it´s being built slowly over a period of a few decades or centuries closer to today´s period than the Mainstream Media would have us believe. If a spaceship did build Stonehenge in 3000 BC, Stonehenge would look like and feel like as if a spaceship had built it. Yet there is obviously no concrete proof! It is far more likely that visiting UFO´s are attracted to the energies on the site itself rather than to the stone circles, and it may be that they could be attracted to the stone circles as well, yet very few, if any of the UFO - Stonehenge incidents have successfully confirmed the identities of the pilots piloting each craft in each Stonehenge UFO event type case.
According to rumours, the Establishment and the Mainstream Media refuse to openly acknowledge how old Stonehenge is supposed to be really.
The official explanation for this is twofold, a) there is no need to because the Archaeological Establishment ´already knows´that it´s 3000 or younger in age, b) space aliens built Stonehenge.
Yet when I had read a few media reports about ´New Stonehenge´I found out that New Stonehenge is actually a wooden mold for the Big Stonehenge, the one we´re told is supposed to be the oldest monument in the world.
It is an anomaly of anomalies, a contrary of contraries, and an irony of ironies to propose a 3000 year old Stonehenge and conjure it from a rabbit´s hat, yet, that is just one of the many fantastic feats of the Mainstream Media.
Use the ´space aliens built Stonehenge´story to promote the Staged Alien Invasion and you get my point - with the Staged Alien Invasion already being a major theme in today´s Mainstream Media news articles.
Note that what is missing on the spaceship building Stonehenge is space visitors telling the engineers how to build it! What an irony!
Thanks for that Tyler. Much appreciated. I have my doupts in terms of space visitors building Stonehenge, I do believe that this planet is being visited all the time though.
Thank you for sharing these pictures on Stonehenge and for the workers re-erecting some of them because
as you know people have always pilfered from monuments especially those that are derelict like there
church and castles as the privilege to do so is in the Magna Charta the same thing was done in the Pyramids
in Egypt. when they not only stole the Treasure they also destroyed and built new pyramids as is recorded.
What is not known and lost to history is the ancient story of Stonehenge having Three Rings not two as is now for some hundreds of years.later. The Book "Cambria Triumphans" written by Percy Enderbie recording the ancient British
Throne Stories in detail records Stonehenge as anciently having Three Rings and I have always wanted to go there to check it. Its been on my must do list but you thankfully after 30 years of wondering have kindly shown me an arial
shot on the second overhead photo which clearly shows the evidence for a Great Circle which according to Legend was erected also with STANDING STONES LIKE THE MODERN REMNANT INNER STONE RINGS REMAINING CALLED STONE HENGE. Look your photo again for you can see the road desecrating the site from the air. Give the photo to Tony Robinson and his Ancient Monument Team. You can clearly see it from the air. Take a second look.
Congratulations and be alert at all times and don't have blinkers on as your discovery is actually the reverse of what you
state. Blessings and keep up the good work but next time ask within and use your Intuition not Your Head.
Blessings Truth Knowledge Wisdom Peace and Harmony Kingjeff.
I regret to inform you that it is probable that the so - called three rings are just that - rings and nothing related to big stones. It´s possible they were created with the aim to enhance the energy field around the area.
Another thing I find to be so blatantly obvious about this whole Stonehenge Deception is the very name of Stonehenge.
THERE IS NO PLACE ON THIS PLANET WHICH TO MY KNOWLEDGE CAN BE POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED WITH ´STONEHENGE´, unlike for example New York, Montauk Island, Grimogaia / Iceland, Greenland / Iceland, Föroyjar, Russia, United States, Canada, Wiltshire, etc.
The official story should be corrected at once and Stonehenge should be declared Wiltshirehenge!!