NaturalNews) TIME Magazine is peddling a death agenda propaganda piece with a new issue that features these words on the cover: "HOW TO DIE."
Inside, the magazine promotes a cost-saving death agenda that encourages readers to literally "pull the feeding tubes" from their dying elderly parents, causing them to dehydrate and die. This is explained as a new cost-saving measure that drastically reduces return hospital visits by the elderly... yeah, because dead people don't return to the hospital, of course.
The article is part of the new soft-sell, hard-kill agenda of the mainstream media which also featured an article on Newsweek Magazine entitled, "The Case for Killing Granny." (http://lookintoit.org/Euthanasia-%28The-Case-For-Killing-Granny%29.ht...)
The cover of that magazine stated, "Curbing excessive end-of-life care is good for America."
Just as with TIME Magazine, Newsweek is pushing a death agenda that devalues the lives of elderly citizens and actually encourages citizens to have their own parents killed in order to reduce medical costs. In fact, as TIME Magazine says, organizations that embrace these "outcome-based" death panel systems actually receive cash bonuses when they save more money by pulling the plug on granny!
for the rest of the story go to this link:
(NaturalNews) TIME Magazine is peddling a death agenda propaganda piece with a new issue that features these words on the cover: "HOW TO DIE."
Inside, the magazine promotes a cost-saving death agenda that encourages readers to literally "pull the feeding tubes" from their dying elderly parents, causing them to dehydrate and die. This is explained as a new cost-saving measure that drastically reduces return hospital visits by the elderly... yeah, because dead people don't return to the hospital, of course.
The article is part of the new soft-sell, hard-kill agenda of the mainstream media which also featured an article on Newsweek Magazine entitled, "The Case for Killing Granny." (http://lookintoit.org/Euthanasia-%28The-Case-For-Killing-Granny%29.ht...)
The cover of that magazine stated, "Curbing excessive end-of-life care is good for America."
Just as with TIME Magazine, Newsweek is pushing a death agenda that devalues the lives of elderly citizens and actually encourages citizens to have their own parents killed in order to reduce medical costs. In fact, as TIME Magazine says, organizations that embrace these "outcome-based" death panel systems actually receive cash bonuses when they save more money by pulling the plug on granny!
That's the answer to health care in America, you see. It's not about nutritional therapy, using trace minerals to prevent disease, avoiding GMOs and toxic chemicals. Nope, it's about pulling the plug and killing your elders and then convincing yourself that you are compassionate for making sure they die sooner rather than later.
It's trendy to kill your parents off, didn't you know? It's good for the economy! And it's good for society! Death to grandma! For God's sake don't give any water to your dying father, either, because it's better to just let him die from kidney failure. Yep, here's an actual quote from the TIME Magazine story: "Renal failure is a good way to go," the story says. Just dehydrate 'em to death and call it trendy.
When you get old, they'll kill you too
Be careful what you wish for,
all you trendies, because sooner or later, you'll be old, too! And if you created a society in which pulling the plug is the socially-acceptable way to kill off all the "useless old people," then don't be surprised when they cut off your feeding tube, too, and you suffer a slow, painful death while your own children cheer about how socially responsible they are.
Watch the full commentary at:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=53166F436FD2309EC97C414D01F7AB39
Or on YouTube at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4FwpAPH7Vk
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036100_death_panels_elderly_TIME_Magazine.html#ixzz1x7GMMan9
Follow the above links for the rest of the story.
Replies
I so agree Jake, how low can the medical profession go, and society as a whole if they promote this type of thing. I made sure I have a Do Not Resusitate order on file at my local hospital because I do not wish to have intrusive devices keeping my "meat suit" alive, I would much rather pass, but to decide to pull the plug on a loved one for the purposes mentioned here is unconscienable! How sick and twisted. And to think that major magazines are pomoting this agenda I find pretty hinky too. I am assuming this just a part of the illuminati's desire to reduce the human population, that is my spin on this.
I think they are referring to the terminally sick and elderly in this case. We have machines and technology that can keep the body alive even though the brain is basically dead. Many people will keep their parents or other sick people on these machines in the false hope that god or prayer or some other miracle will save them. Forcing that person to not be able to leave their body to go back to source.
This could set a disturbing precedent to begin something like soylent green, however i think the intent of not wanting to spend millions on someone who is about to die anyways is smart. How many families in the USA who have no or poor healthcare could afford to keep someone hooked up to machines. In fact if you need machines to live then are you really "living".
For those unaware of what even GOOD healthcare coverage is like in the us I have friends who have two chldren both with a lifelong disease. She pays 1000$ A MONTH yes a month for their insurace JUST FOR THE KIDS, and when it is time for a precedure for them she still has to pay 5000$ out of pocket for the evaluations. People just cannot afford to keep the dead living in that type of economy.
If the wars stopped then this of course would be a non-issue as everyone would be able to have good healthcare for their whole lives and not have a worn out sick body which needs machines to keep it running
I understand what you are saying, I just think that people should really have their wishes spelled out in advance of becoming terminally ill. DNRs ( do not resusitate orders) are an important thing to have if you do not want to be hooked up for continuation of your body by machines. I know that there are many that are hooked up that would love to be let go if only it would be allowed. And I do know how hard it must be to let that relative or loved one go. It is just such a hard decision to make, pulling the plug, but oftentimes it is by far the most merciful.
I think the thing that concerned me the most was the mention of getting bonuses and cash incentives for encouraging families of those on life support fo pull their plugs. That just seems so cold to me. I do understand what you are saying, the practicality of pulling the plug in a financial sense, but I find it disturbing when other human beings are being encouraged for financial gain to be involved in the ending of a life, when the person on the machines does no longer have a say as to what happens. I am sure in the majority of cases they would want to be released from the prison of their useless unfunctional bodies. My suggestion to everyone is to plan ahead and fill out that DNR if you do not want to be on a machine and trapped in a useless body.....Do it toda! Give it to a trusted relative and be sure to carry a copy if you go to the hospital for an operation or proceedure. Most hospitals now ask if you have one. Check with your local hospital about them getting one for you to fill out. It is good to have it notarized as well if possible, just to be on the safe side.. Save your familly the emotional and ethical decisions that they may be faced with.
Maybe if insurance companies required that their policy holders fill out an advance directive specifying if they wish to be kept artificially alive on not as a requirement for providing insurance to a person, it would save a lot on whether someone is hooked up or not. The way the current laws are, hospitals are required to hook people up unless specified in advance, and that does certainly cost a fortune. I think the vast majority of people would chose to NOT be on life support, and would rather pass.
Totally bizarre.