'MAGNITUDE 5.9 EARTHQUAKE - OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA' - Spiritual Forum - Ashtar Command

The following report was transcribed verbatim from:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recentequs/Quakes/nc71348851.php

Magnitude 5.9 - OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

2010 February 04 20:20:21 UTC

Details
Maps
Scientific & Technical
Additional Info

Earthquake Details

Magnitude	5.9
Date-Time	Thursday, February 04, 2010 at 20:20:21 UTC Thursday, February 04, 2010 at 12:20:21 PM at epicenter Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location	40.431°N, 124.929°W
Depth	11.2 km (7.0 miles)
Region	OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances	56 km (35 miles) WNW (282°) from Petrolia, CA 59 km (36 miles) WSW (254°) from Ferndale, CA 68 km (42 miles) WSW (256°) from Fortuna, CA 76 km (47 miles) WSW (239°) from Eureka, CA 363 km (225 miles) NW (306°) from Sacramento, CA
Location Uncertainty	horizontal +/- 1.4 km (0.9 miles); depth +/- 2 km (1.2 miles)
Parameters	Nph=101, Dmin=50 km, Rmss=0.35 sec, Gp=227°, M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=A
Source	California Integrated Seismic Net: USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR
Event ID	nc71348851

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Did you feel it? Report shaking and damage at your location. You can also view a map displaying accumulated data from your report and others.

"Remember, or be unmade......!!...Get back to nature, healthy food and water, meditation and exercise...Learn truth and connect with yourself...Don't be surrounded in bed, by EM fields.....Don't take mRNA shots, keep your DNA healthy....Ignore the…"

On June 6, 2026, at 3:33 AM, twelve pyramids on six continents and the ocean floor simultaneously emitted a pulse at the frequency of human bone. Geologists dismissed this as an instrumental error. But seismographs are accurate, and satellites…

Replies

Ashaka February 5, 2010 at 3:37am

Interesting .. thank you for the immediate update!

Here's another site that helps to see earthquakes on a global scale http://www.iris.edu/dms/seismon.htm
- Andronover > Ashaka February 5, 2010 at 5:54pm
  
  Thank´s for the link , USGS isn´t reliable
  /Peter
  - 3rfl3nfqndi4s > Andronover February 5, 2010 at 7:49pm
    
    According to my info, the size of quakes is minimized for public consumption. In other words, the quakes are much stronger than reported. Anyone else heard this?
    - Ashaka > 3rfl3nfqndi4s February 6, 2010 at 2:54am
      
      No ... I haven't heard this, but have indeed noticed that what is given out in the media is often less than what has been recorded with the Iris Seismic Monitor.
      
      It's interesting observing these quakes on a global scale as you can sort of see how the plates are moving and how each plate might affect another one beside it.
      
      The only thing missing from this that might help us to understand what is happening globally is coinciding volcanic activity.
Cedric February 5, 2010 at 1:53am

News ...we are not ...body...
Jazmin February 5, 2010 at 12:48am

It's weird, I got up around 6:20am (Queensland Australia time)... the time of the offshore Northern California earthquake.

This reply was deleted.

Earthquake Details

Replies

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.