Spiritual Forum

Federal Authority Over the Internet? The Cybersecurity Act of 2009

Posted by Teddy on April 16, 2009 at 7:50pm in Guidance & Inspiration
Commentary by Jennifer GranickThere's a new bill working its way through Congress that is cause for some alarm: the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, introduced by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME). The bill as it exists now risks giving the federal government unprecedented power over the Internet without necessarily improving security in the ways that matter most. It should be opposed or radically amended.Essentially, the Act would federalize critical infrastructure security. Since many of our critical infrastructure systems (banks, telecommunications, energy) are in the hands of the private sector, the bill would create a major shift of power away from users and companies to the federal government. This is a potentially dangerous approach that favors the dramatic over the sober response.One proposed provision gives the President unfettered authority to shut down Internet traffic in an emergency and disconnect critical infrastructure systems on national security grounds goes too far. Certainly there are times when a network owner must block harmful traffic, but the bill gives no guidance on when or how the President could responsibly pull the kill switch on privately-owned and operated networks.Furthermore, the bill contains a particularly dangerous provision that could cripple privacy and security in one fell swoop:The Secretary of Commerce— shall have access to all relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access…In other words, the bill would give the Commerce Department absolute, non-emergency access to “all relevant data” without any privacy safeguards like standards or judicial review. The broad scope of this provision could eviscerate statutory protections for private information, such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Privacy Protection Act, or financial privacy regulations. Even worse, it isn’t clear whether this provision would require systems to be designed to enable access, essentially a back door for the Secretary of Commerce that would also establish a primrose path for any bad guy to merrily skip down as well. If the drafters meant to create a clearinghouse for system vulnerability information along the lines of a US/CERT mailing list, that could be useful, but that’s not what the bill’s current language does.A privacy threat still in the cocoon is the provision mandating a study of the feasibility of an identity management and authentication program with just a nod to “appropriate civil liberties and privacy protections.” There’s reason to fear that this type of study is just a precursor to proposals to limit online anonymity. But anonymity isn’t inherently a security problem. What’s “secure” depends on the goals of the system. Do you need authentication, accountability, confidentiality, data integrity? Each goal suggests a different security architecture, some totally compatible with anonymity, privacy and civil liberties. In other words, no one “identity management and authentication program” is appropriate for all internet uses.Whether the bill is amended or rejected, the question remains what kind of actions would help cybersecurity, and what role the federal government has to play. As security expert Bruce Schneier has pointed out, the true causes of government cyber-insecurity are rather mundane:GAO reports indicate that government problems include insufficient access controls, a lack of encryption where necessary, poor network management, failure to install patches, inadequate audit procedures, and incomplete or ineffective information security programs.The Cybersecurity Act is an example of the kind of dramatic proposal that doesn't address the real problems of security, and can actually make matters worse by weakening existing privacy safeguards – as opposed to simpler, practical measures that create real security by encouraging better computer hygiene. We’ll be watching this bill carefully to ensure that it doesn’t pass in its present form.Sourcehttp://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/cybersecurity-actCybersecurity Act of 2009http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-773PDF summaryhttp://commerce.senate.gov/public/_files/Cyberbillsummaryonepagerplusthreepagesummarypressrelease1Apr090.pdf
Views: 45

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Tags: 2009, act, congress, cybersecurity, federal, jay, olympia, rockefeller, snowe, anonymity
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

    • Teddy > Delilah7777 April 18, 2009 at 6:04pm
      How is posting this giving energy to negativity? This is meant to inform that there’s a sinister move to regulate the web. If people knew this, they would counter this with positive energy without fear. Perhaps it is the way you received this post that you need to reassess and rediscover. I wouldn’t know because everyone has his or her own way of self-realization. What I do know is do not fear and don’t remain in the dark about certain things that are happening. Be positive no matter what comes your way. Peace
This reply was deleted.

Latest Discussion

Most Popular Discussion

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Love & Joy posted a discussion
Rewriting The Core Code - Oops, System Glitch
Rewriting The Core Code - Oops, System Glitch Transmission from Maya of the PleiadesRewriting the Core Code Oops, System Glitch - Starting Over In 5DMaya, with giggles from the Pleiades " Oh, my bright beings! You’re still running Version Human 1.0:…
See More
3 hours ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
Sapphire Blue Realm * Out of body Experience
 Sapphire Blue Realm * Out of body Experience  The energies were extraordinary last night — vibrant, alive, almost electric. I can only assume this intensity was stirred by the closest fly-by of the 3iAtlas “comet” as it brushed near our Sun,…
See More
4 hours ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
The Andromedans on 3iATLAS By SolaraAnRa
 The Andromedans on 3iATLAS By SolaraAnRa Love and thank you thank you to the Andromedans for this reassuring and uplifting message about 3iATLAS. She is conscious, benevolent, and has a very focused purpose and intent in this exact time portal!…
See More
6 hours ago
Love & Joy posted a discussion
Activating the New Earth Light Codes and Stargates From Within By Anrita Melchizedek
      Activating the New Earth Light Codes and Stargates From Within By Anrita Melchizedek Beloved heart, in this Now moment, we are expanding into a symphony of celestial spheres and Light Harmonics that are flooding our Solar System amplified…
See More
8 hours ago
Andromedaner Z left a comment on Comment Wall
"yes Drekx, that's really bad"
12 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Thank God the GFL would disable those weapons at the snap of a finger. I do think though those old Q posts that mention a Cuban Missile Crisis type of event still could happen. Peace would prevail in the end of course, but it would definitely be a…"
12 hours ago
Spirit left a comment on Comment Wall
"This is my take on the current situation. Words create reality so be careful where you put your energy. I myself believe what Trump said back in 2016 It will be a smooth transition and we are not just trading positions of power from one political…"
12 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"The so-called "scare event" should polarise the people against nuclear war and expose the cabal war mongers...It may not even happen, as already the war mongers are not getting the support they need, with America rapidly removing itself, from the…"
13 hours ago
More…

New Blog Posts