Replies

  • Religions are so many and so diverse that a single word like 'religion' does not mean anything. Freemason is 'religion', Christianity is a 'religion', devil worshiping is 'religion' etc. What do these groups have in common so that we put the same label on them? Nothing! So we should stop talking of 'religion' and rather say the exact group you are attacking.

    People who use the word 'religion' are the lazy guys who want to read labels on containers saying 'this is salt', 'this is sugar', 'this is oil' etc, but never want to open the can to check the exact contents. They want an easy, 'one-size-fit-all' diagnosis of human problems. So they have identified one umbrella termed 'religion'. But they are deceiving themselves. Saying 'religion' is like saying 'an animal'. You haven't sayed anything. There is no such a single entity an 'an animal'. It is more meaningfull to say 'cobra', 'tortoise', 'domestic cat', 'leopard', 'giraffe' etc. So when you telk someone, beware, there is a cobra on the way, he understands what you are talking of. Then we generalize afterwards, if we even need such a generalization.

    Remember that generalization is a human, lazy shortcut. He can't list all the dangerous groups, so he shoehorn a bulk of them into a single basket and give it a single name. That was the use of generalization. But its abuse is never ending! It is abused to bring about confusion and smear. Rather than examining individual concepts, claims, ideas or people, we just concentrate on seeing their 'earmarks' and then conclud that we have known everything there is to know about them. Guess what? It is 'religion', it is 'politics', it is 'fear'. It is 'ego', he is a 'starseed' etc!
    • I for one never need to figure out a group where an idea, belief etc belong to as a guide to judgement. I don't first categorize, then judge. This is dangerous and misleading. When we think this way, we can easily be manipulated by a few people. Rather that making a judgment, we are shoehorning it to fit what we read in a book, an article, a channelled message etc. Since no channeler writter etc can make a whole list, he sells ideas in bulk. But We can debunk groups, behaviours etc without even saying, for instance, 'this is a religion'. If a group is murderous, it is murderous. Whatever 'group' they belong is irrelevant.
  • Do not trust religious extremists..they are dangerous reptilians
  • Beware of religious extremists..who force their religions on to others ...they actually do more evil and hide as religious extremists..they pretend to be good outer appearance but inside they are evil ..crooks .. liars..and corrupt
This reply was deleted.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Protagonists!🖤✨

I want to acknowledge the incredible depth of thought within this group. We have some brilliant minds, who are deeply invested in understanding the mechanics of our reality, our ancient and cosmic history. That curiosity is great…"
21 minutes ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 07/08/2026 by EraOfLight — Leave a reply Beloved Spark of Infinity,From the heart of the Great Central Sun, we reach you now.You are not apart from us, you are the rhythm of our breath, the pulse of our knowing. We are you, and you…
28 minutes ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 07/08/2026 by EraOfLight — Leave a reply Many of you are still under the impression that your thoughts belong to you or are created by you. We assure you, this is not so. Thoughts and ideas exist as frequencies within consciousness…
42 minutes ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 07/08/2026 by EraOfLight — Leave a reply I am Kara,I have been looking forward to being able to speak with you once again this way and to assist you in knowing that; indeed, we have been waiting for this almost as much as you have…
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's blog post The MOON is a Titanium Ball from Ex-Planet Maldek
"Justin asked:
"Any info available on what the two new natural moons will look like? I'm guessing they will be similar to the ones we had back in ancient times before they were destroyed."


Drekx reply:
Yes, like the ancient moons, about a quarter…"
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes, like the ancient moons, about a quarter the size of the current artificial moon and orbiting on opposite sides of Earth...So smaller than Ganymede, or Callisto, which orbit a gas giant and larger than Phobos, which is Martian and about 14 miles…"
3 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Any info available on what the two new natural moons will look like? I'm guessing they will be similar to the ones we had back in ancient times before they were destroyed."
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"I did post this comment on my other blog, but it mentions that the Anunnaki actually took Sumerian priests to the moon's interior section....This tablet is absolutely amazing...

OK friends, I hope this data is of interest, as it does consolidate…"
4 hours ago
More…