I
TRANSFORMATION OF IMPRESSIONS
Conscious Attention excludes what is called…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
I
TRANSFORMATION OF IMPRESSIONS
Conscious Attention excludes what is called…
Weird- and it gets more wierd-Dark Journalist claims that the artist listed here was actually a spy, spying on engineers in California who were working on airships, etc.-…
... A World in Transition: The Awakening Within Us By Tori Cota-Robles This guided meditation offers a calm and spacious experience to support you in grounding during a time of deep inner and collective change. Through gentle awareness of the…
Read more…The Sacred Art of Letting the Universe Drive (While You Enjoy the View) Maya From The Pleaides Beloved one, come closer, not because you are far, but because your mind has been driving in circles, and I would love to gently take the steering wheel…
Read more…Remember - Emotions Without A Story Are Just.....?A Transmission from Maya of the PleiadesHello my beautiful over-thinking Earthlings,Today Maya wishes to speak about two little secrets that many psychologists forget to put on the dinner table…
Read more…Pleiadian Transmission On 5th Dimensional Love Are you ready to experience the 5th dimensional love? I created this song to provide support not only for releasing the energetic cords of past relationships, but also to help you recognize something…
Read more…New Moon Reiki Meditation With Katya KI This New Moon Guided Meditation with Reiki is designed to help you manifest your best timeline during the new lunar cycle. You can begin practicing this meditation a few days before the New Moon, continue…
Read more…Rhythm & The 7th Ray Of Creation By Steven Hutchinson Now I invite each of you to look at your life for a moment. Your habits. Your beliefs. Your reactions to people and situations in your life. Did they appear overnight?Of course not.They were…
Read more…
Comments
"I would say that international sporting events were first designed by the Greeks and Romans, to bring nations, or imperial provinces, together in celebration...When the concept was re-introduced to the world, in Athens, Greece, 1896, the SPIRIT OF FRIENDSHIP was the intent..."
In what sense then does raising an issue relevant to the absence of one or two nations, in the event intended to 'bring nations together in celebration' inconsistent with the spirit of unity and friendship amongst nations??
Raising awareness pertaining to unfriendliness towards a certain group of pple is perfectly in line with the spirit of of friendship and unity amongst nations. If games were meant to promote unity amongst nations, then it is hard for the same games to be indifferent to issues that divides pple, let alone 'criminalize' any other attempt to bring that unity!!
"Why do pple write books about such a thing as 1968 event? Was it so extraordinary thing to merely protest against racism in a sporting event, more extraordinary than apartheid still being practiced in 20th century??" End quote...
I would say that international sporting events were first designed by the Greeks and Romans, to bring nations, or imperial provinces, together in celebration...When the concept was re-introduced to the world, in Athens, Greece, 1896, the SPIRIT OF FRIENDSHIP was the intent...That and enjoyment of competative sports, between athletes and through them, nations...
The converse was actually first introduced during the Berlin Olympics of 1936, in which nations did not demonstrate against the Nazis, but rather gestured political support for them, by using the Nazi salute, as they passed Hitler...Even the English did this at the time, which caused outrage....
So the politicization of sports, at international and national levels, causes frictions, and that leads to tensions....Hitler used 1936 as a grand demonstration to the world, of how "superior" his Übermensch were, albeit, in the process made his cause rather stunted, by the good performance of black athletes, such as Jesse Owens....
Again, causing anger in the German crowds and anger in the visitor guests...Hitler's disapproval of Owens success, were most obvious and highly political....
So, like 1968 and 1972, a BAD EXAMPLE, not in keeping with the spirit of unity, that the Games were supposed to promote, between nations...
Some British athletes politicized the Games of 1936, in just as an idiotic way, as American athletes did in 1968....Different causes, but the same fanaticism...
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/07/19/08/2AA31DE200000578-3166...
Even with that, no one talked of bombings in Bolton marathon!! If we don't want politics in sports, then bombings in stadiums should be what we are spending more time condemning, not some mere gesture that did not harm anyone!! But we find them still saying '1968 was the most political thing in sports'. In other words it is more than a terrorist attack in a stadium??
Why can we use sports to advertise toxins but not to advertise morals and/or ethics??
"These political protests at sporting events are anti-social and designed to offend and hijack, what should be a neutral and apolitical international festival of sports, between nations...It is good manners to respect others, by not protesting your cause, valid or not, at a medal ceremony..."
I disagree with this! If someone has a VALID cause, being 'neutral' is no longer a morally justifiable stand. 'Neutral' does not always mean 'more ethical'. True, they have a 'right' to create any of those so called 'neutral' things. But this doesn't mean they always deserve the respect.
Sports are not 'apolitical' in the sense that politics affects sports. No Palestinian has ever won a medal, for instance, and every sporting event, in fact EXPRESSES this political reality! They cannot thus boast to us that 'they are apolitical'. There is no such a thing in the society!
Drekx response: These political protests at sporting events are anti-social and designed to offend and hijack, what should be a neutral and apolitical international festival of sports, between nations...It is good manners to respect others, by not protesting your cause, valid or not, at a medal ceremony.....Or on a pitch, with the inane kneeling, which frankly looks and is, STUPID.....
Yes, freedom to protest at the ballot, by voting...Or taking part in a demonstration in a street...BUT, when these fanatics disrupt events such as the Olympics, it becomes highly disagreeable....There have been even worst examples of this madness, such as 1972 and Black September, Munich.....
It is not going to win and hearts and minds to your supposed cause...In fact, the Munich massacre caused the world to absolutely turn against the Palestianians.....
Whether it's Black Panthers, Black September, or Black Lives Matter, the sporting event should not be hijacked for political advantages...And in practice, causes the public and wider world, to switch off interest and support...
http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/120727105203-munich-terrorist...
No! If 'rules' of Olympics or whatever forbids people from peacefully expressing themselves over whatever issue, then who should care about Olympics anyway? What we should be protesting against is those rules meant to go way round the anti-tyranny of the constitution. We should boycott the Olympics itself etc for attempting to silence pple! Those 'rules' are not inspired by the same spirit that inspired the constitution.
But maybe if I use Twitter, Facebook etc banning of Trump etc, my point will sink more to some pple. The constitution provides for freedom of speech. If you respect the constitution, then neither would you erect an organization that forbids freedom of speech nor moraly support any such organization. Pple should not group pple with the aim of infringing on 'freedom of speech', such as they did in Twitter. But the 'conservatives' too should not cheer organizations (including stadiums) that try to stiffle freedom of expression, now that what they want to express is unpopular amongst the 'conservatives'. They should be consistent, if they are to make a good point.
I would like to repeat that it is not our English, or British tradition, at all and is particular to the Amerikan left, with origins among American socialists, of the Frankfurt School ideology....
It really started in the 1960s in America....
We in the UK mostly find it repugnant and do not share American history, even....Indeed, the left always forget that the UK was the first nation in history to abolish the slave trade, in 1830......Long before most other countries, at that time, including America...
Enjoy this video and her take on the ongoing madness we are being subject to, in the so-called "west."🤣
These woke corporations, such as Virgin Atlantic, do not represent the people here, at all....Most of us don't give a stuff about their insanity, but are concerned when they keep trying to force it all, upon us....Customers, for example...Or students in universities...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNM_7Ul8SM
-
1122
-
1123
-
1124
-
1125
-
1126
of 1835 Next