Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 12:47pm

  A quantum particle is simply a particle surfing on a wave!! This is what quantum flapdoodles have been qawking at for 100 years!
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 11:37am

  

  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=ht...
  
  You can see what this guy does is to show that you can achieve what QM talks about but without supposing that our clasic notion of 'particle' is wrong, debunking Feynman and other bozos but without contradicting any experiment. A theory or a 'law' is what a man THINKS, and not necessarily a reality no matter how many experiments seems to confirm it!
  
  Note Karl's Popper's 'falsification' rather than 'confirmation' criteria.
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 10:54am

  

  Take for instance the so called 'Einsteinian Barrier'. I simply drop Einstein's Theory entirely, and try to explain everything that that theory can explain but using 'winds' and 'sails' that can be shown to a child! I derive the equations and illustrate in a wind how Einsteinian Barrier comes about, and you can see it for yourself that it can occur without completely forbiding a superluminal motion!
  
  This is the approach that I recommend. Rather than trying to comply with these man made so called 'laws', aim directly at complying with DATA with no other requirement!
• 

  Joanna April 7, 2021 at 10:49am

  I thought you'd appeciate it....and agree, that to truly comprehend/encompass 'the phenomenon' from a scientific basis will require a post-quantum approach and understanding...this too will come (or already exists, in the 'near future', in linear speak)... 😊
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 10:42am

  

  In my attempt to explain UFO using 'pilot wave theory', I eventually abandon QM all together as QM does not apply in UFO scale. Instead I tried to form an entirely different theory of subatomic world that is closely similar to QM but sometimes it departs from QM. So more accurately, QM is an INSPIRATION rather than the actual theory. The real theory that explains the subatomic world, I beleive, is more sensible than QM and does not forbid superluminal motion. It only makes it difficult to achieve.
  
  So I honestly say that this is not 'just a quantum theory' and 'does not break laws of QM'. It does, and any theory that must explain a superluminal UFO must violet these theories at some point. So don't be misled! My main aim is to break these laws in the least way I can conceive of. In otherwords I recommend that we modify these theories in the least way.
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 10:33am

  I like this attitude, of first trying to reconcile the phenomenon with known laws of physics rather than the usual 'it defy laws of physics' made without even care to close examine the so called 'laws'.
  
  However, the guy is not honest in claiming that the quantum correction to general relativity occurs in scales far greater than the so called 'Planck's Length', such as in 'dark matter'. If dark matter does not exist, then GR is wrong at scales larger than a galaxy, not smaller than Planck's Length, hence a quantum theory of gravity cannot be a correction to GR that explains 'dark matter'.
  
  In a closely similar case, a quantum correction to GR will not explain superluminal UAP because the UAP is in the 'Newtonian Scale' not even the GR scale.
  
  GR simply cannot explain such small things as UAP, as this is the scale where Newts Gravity reigns supreme! To explain UFOs, we need to SUPERSEDE these theories, not to COMPLETE them!
• 

  Joanna April 7, 2021 at 8:44am

  On another topic, about how ships move (at least when they're engaging in what we understand/perceive as spacetime), you & others may like to consider this hypothesis (that ships create their own geodesics by curving spacetime):
  
  https://www.uaptheory.com/

  

  UAP Theory

  We explain a fundamental theory on how UAPs (UFOs) actually work, how they fly & move and why they have the capabilities that we observe them to have.
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 8:14am

  

  There is no military strategic advantage to gain by launching a nuke, hence no nukes are used. As simple as that!! This theory explains why they were used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki plus explains why exactly it was not used on any other city or against Hitler. The ET theory does not explain this.
  
  If military could launch nukes even without any military gain, then they could kill us using bullets, grenades, etc. We don't need nukes to carry out genocides!
• 

  Joanna April 7, 2021 at 7:20am

  Hehe, well, speaking of Star Family helping out (in various ways) with Earth's situation doesn't in my view imply hatred of humans, nor does it assume that all humans have uncontrollable destructive urges, or encourage disavowal of self-responsibility...if that was the case, our galactic families&friends could simply resolve every issue on Earth with a proverbial 'hey presto'. Overparenting doesn't allow for growth or maturation though. 😊
  Sending a clear message (and keeping less friendly beings' hands off buttons) however, has obviously been considered necessary, since they've taken such overt, directed actions.
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 7, 2021 at 7:02am

  

  There is no problem with that perhaps ETs are also there to assist in such( or perhaps the malicious ones may also press the buttons lol!). I attempted to address this issue in details because I routinely saw this question of possibility of nuclear war being raised over and over here and the only answer they routinely gave was 'don't worry, ETs don't allow nukes'! Thus they reaffirm that our fellow human beings are wicked, murderous and always ready to launch nukes and destroy the life on the planet. Our only hope for survival, so they insinuate, lies in the hands ETs ( meanwhile we know that nukes have been used twice, after all!)
  
  This belief is not true. Destroying life on earth is not in anyone's interest here on earth. Perhaps ETs are there, but the theory that they actively prevent a nuclear war at every moment is not necessary to explain the fact thay nukes have never been used except twice. There are better explanations that are in line with how we observe military operations here on earth since the dawn of history. We don't see our governments anywhere on earth respond with airstrikes to react to a civilian riots. To address this issue, we must understand the nature of military operations.
  
  What if US president orders that a nuke be launched on Tehran. Will military executive this? The answer is no! Military is not private dogs for the president. (Btw Gaddaffi orderd military to bomb rioters but this order was disobeyed ). So nukes, or any other weapon for that matter, are not in the fingures of one person. The president issues orders, but the military also check if the orders are in line with military rules. Non of the nuke order will be in line with military rules (except if there is a military city to be destroyed). Thus humans, not necessarily ETs prevents nuclear war. A lot of people must first agree on it, which is unlikely.
  
  We must not credit ETs for human work and responsibilities. We must not creat 'hatred for humans and love for ETs' without adequate reasons.