Probably running for pres paul is in for the 'hitler' treatment from the scumbags in the major media- may they rot in the pit of the lowest level of hell. And rand why court the loonie left with 'diversity' ? The social pervs will always hate everyone who doesn't think as they do(actually they are possessed by destructive spirits always in chaos mode to create destruction and vibes they can absorb)
Fewer than 50 days before an election that may give Republicans control of the Senate as well as the House, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Saturday skipped past those contests entirely to focus on one in which he may play a more central role — the 2016 presidential race.
Paul, the featured speaker at the California Republican convention, made no mention of the party’s national advantages this year. He blasted President Obama and potential Democratic nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton as insufficient present or future commanders-in-chief. He insisted that the GOP must dramatically expand its reach in order to win presidential contests — a strategy that coincides with his pre-presidential efforts.
He accused Obama of confounding the Constitution when he expanded Obamacare, moved against overseas targets without specific congressional authorization, and announced plans — since delayed — to use executive action to change the nation’s immigration laws.
“It is a terrible tragedy, it is a danger to us as a country, and we need to do everything we can to stop him from abusing our laws,” Paul said. He said later, "We have a president who basically has created a lawless atmosphere in Washington.”
Speaking about Clinton, he used her famous 2008 primary ad, which argued that she more than Obama would be the president capable of answering a phone call about a middle-of-the-night crisis:
“I think she had a 3 a.m. moment. She didn’t answer the phone, and I think it absolutely should preclude her from being [president],” he said after detailing what he termed her failings leading up to the 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. (His final word was obscured by applause from the strongly anti-Clinton crowd.)
Those were the easy targets, however. Paul’s more passionate appeal was one that he has forwarded across the country in such unlikely venues as UC Berkeley. Paul’s argument — that the party needs to expand from its older and white base, groups amply represented among the delegates — was framed as one that could reverse the party's long record of thumpings in California and its national presidential losses.
“When our party looks like America — with earrings and without earrings, with ponytails and without ponytails, with tattoos and without tattoos — when we look like the rest of America — white, black, brown — we’re going to win again,” he told an audience gathered near LAX. “We’ve got to go out and we’ve got to broaden our party, and when we do, we’ll be a national party again. We will win again.”
- the most corrupt POS to ever come down the pike. The black satan shoud be arrested for treasonHOTGEN1AT 6:24 AM SEPTEMBER 21, 2014
Paul suggested a freshening of the GOP message — he did not, he said, mean to suggest that the party “dilute” its principles and “be more like Democrats” — in order to attract young voters and the Latino and African American voters who have spurned the party in California and elsewhere.
He specifically cited issues he has pressed for months, including the NSA’s mining of data from cell phones, what he termed excessive sentences for drug use and expanding the ability of voters to cast ballots.
“What you say or do on your cell phone is none of the government’s damn business,” he said.
But as he made his argument there was a bit of a reality check in the room — Neel Kashkari, the party’s nominee for governor.
The child of immigrants from India, Kashkari has conducted an unusual campaign: He spent time posing as a homeless person to underscore his criticism of Democratic policies on poverty, and he marched in a gay rights parade in San Diego.
Replies
PET ROCK: Rand Paul is not trustworthy, because he maintains the need for financial support of Israel. Israel has received money amounts from U.S. taxpayers that equal 4x the cost of the Apollo Moon program and we have yet to see a giant leap for mankind from that country in terms of industrial, agriculture, or scientific breakthroughs that benefit society or foster creativity (that is non-war related). And anytime Israel gets a leader that tries to draw national borders for Israel (ISRAEL HAS NEVER DECLARED IT'S BORDERS TO THIS DATE), they get murdered. Yitzhak Rabin is proof of this.
If ISIS (or the Free Syria Army, or Al Qaeda, or whatever the new name is for these C.I.A. sponsored nutjobs) is truly a voice for the Sunni Muslim people, then this organization (or organizations) should openly address the atrocities of Israel since Israel has violated agreements and invaded neighboring countries that are Sunni Muslim based. The fact that these organizations have not said one iyoda about Israel makes them suspect that they are pawns sponsored for Israel, possibly to be used for emotionally-based actions (i.e. fake beheadings) that result in generation of profits for the military industrial complex industry (which Israel is noted for investing heavily into, as opposed to investing heavily into areas that foster social creativity and commerce (as opposed to destruction of such)).
And no, this does not make one anti-semetic for asking why Rand Paul (as well as these dual-citizenship AIPAC tricks in Washington D.C. calling themselves public servants) need to support Israel, since Israel will not invest the money we give them in non-war-related areas or draw the borders of their country. I am also starting to wonder what dirt Israeli intelligence (AND THE NSA OR CIA) may have on Rand Paul, or if he and his family have been threatened by these organized criminal organizations that spy on their citizens, and not potential enemies that are foreign-based.
still better than paying off shiites to be our allies-they want to convert us to islam
PET ROCK: if Shiite Muslims want to convert "us" to Islam, then how come the Jewish population in Iran (a country with a VERY LARGE Shiite Muslim population) still refuses to move to Israel?
From http://972mag.com/with-tens-of-thousands-of-jews-living-in-iran-why...
By Larry Derfner
With Tens Of Thousands Of Jews Living In Iran, Why Is Bibi Calling Their Rulers Nazis?
|Published October 4, 2013
If Netanyahu really believes the Iranian regime is another Nazi Germany, if he really believes its creed is “death to the Jews” as he said in his speech this week to the UN General Assembly, why does he heap contempt on the regime and its leaders, why does he threaten to bomb the country, when there are, depending on the estimate, between 15,000 and 35,000 Jews living there?With 15,000 to 35,000 Jews living in Iran, how can he say all that in such a high-profile international forum, with the Iranians listening to every word? If he believes what he says, it stands to reason he would fear that the regime will pay the country’s Jewish community back for the unrestrained contempt that he, the leader of the Jewish state, showed it – and not for the first or the hundredth time, either.
Unless you believe Netanyahu actually intends to bring persecution down on the Jews of Iran, which I think is a ridiculous, mindless idea, then either he doesn’t believe that the Iranian regime is the Nazis incarnate, which means he’s been lying all this time; or he believes it, but puts it out of his mind because the thought of endangering Iranian Jews would cause him to tame his rhetoric, which he doesn’t want to do, and Netanyahu is one of those people who has immunized himself against any thought that might impede him from doing what he wants to do.
The first explanation, that he doesn’t believe what he’s saying, makes him out to be lying. The second, that he does believe it, makes him out to be playing recklessly with the fundamental well-being of Iran’s Jewish community. Which one is correct? They both are. It’s a combination of lies and recklessness that allows Netanyahu to let fly in such a personalized, incendiary way against Iran’s powers-that-be, even though tens of thousands of Iranian Jews are completely vulnerable to them. (Netanyahu’s predecessors going back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution also attacked the country’s leadership, and Ehud Olmert likewise threatened to bomb its nuclear facilities, and none of those prime ministers, nor any other Israeli politician, seemed to consider what effect their campaign might have on Iranian Jews. Still, among the field of Iran-fighters, Netanyahu is Muhammad Ali – in a class by himself.)
So what is it about the presence in Iran of a sizable Jewish community that makes Bibi’s depiction of the country’s ruling establishment first of all a lie? It’s that if the Iranians really were Nazis, if they really did believe in “death to the Jews,” those 15,000 to 35,000 Jews would have joined the 100,000 or so others who’ve left the country, many going to Israel, since Khomeini took over. The Jews in Iran can leave; whatever financial difficulties might be involved wouldn’t count if Iran was the anti-Semitic swamp Netanyahu says it is. (Meir Javedanfar, who left Iran for Israel in 1987 and is a leading authority on the Islamic Republic, wrote this week: “In Iran the chant after the revolution was ‘death to Israel’ and not ‘death to Jews’ as Netanyahu said. As reprehensible as both chants are, it was not state policy to state “Death to Jews.”)
If Iran was another Nazi Germany, there wouldn’t be some 60 active synagogues in the country, including about a dozen in Tehran. If Iran was another Nazi Germany, the head of the Jewish community wouldn’t have sent a letter to Ahmadinejad in 2006 reproaching him for his Holocaust denial. If Iran was another Nazi Germany, the Jewish community would not have weathered the regime’s outrage at Israel for apparently orchestrating the assassinations of several Iranian nuclear scientists.
And if Iran’s hatred of Israel was such that it was prepared to be annihilated for the privilege of nuking the country – which would make it even more anti-Semitic than Nazi Germany – it would not be able to make the distinction it makes between the Jewish state on the one hand, and Jews and Judaism on the other.
Iranian Jewish group says community's identity not for sale; donors offer $10,000 to move to Israel.
An Iranian Jewish organization announced over the weekend that it rejected an initiative to compel Iran's Jewish community to immigrate to Israel using cash incentives.
"[The money is]inappropriate and politically immature," the group said in a statement that was carried by Western and Iranian news outlets.
It added Iran's Jewish community has remained loyal to the Islamic Republic and that their "Jewish Iranian identity is not a commodity that passes from the hands of one merchant to another in return for money."
The statment addressed an offer by expatriate Iranian Jews offering a sum of $10,000 to each individual to immigrate to Israel.
The $10,000 offer doubled the existing $5,000 allocated each Jewish Iranian upon arrival to Israel by the Ministry of Absorption and the Jewish Agency.
Iran's Jewish community has decreased from 80,000 before the Islamic revolution, to about 20,000 today.
It is represented in parliament by a Jewish lawmaker and is the largest Jewish community in the Middle East outside of Israel.
Well, if you're against Hitlery you could be considered "sexist"!