Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely June 5, 2022 at 7:44am

  Compare this with the old 'boss' model. The company employs a boss to supervise the workers. But the so called 'boss' has since cease doing his job and zeroed in on harassing employees. The boss is a non-performer who feeds on the work of employees. He earns the biggest salary and does the least work! He steals the work of his juniors and takes their credit and conveniently shift every blame to his juniors! The boss fears competent juniors as he thinks that they might compete with him (should one gets promoted). So he fires every competent employee! He doesn't need competence in the particular task. He needs OBEDIENCE in irrelevant tasks. To maintain your job, you don't need to perform! Rather you need to apeas the boss. You need to untie his shoe lases, and if you are a woman, have some sex with one! The 'boss' have found endless illusions to convince the company, and even the whole country and the world that 'this is the only way of doing work'!
  
  Of course such business models don't work! They solely rely on MONOPOLY of companies and corporation and then confuse 'making money due to monopoly' with 'making money due to competence in business'. Needless to say, they come down on a free fall once a competitor breaks through the barriers or if government levels the playing ground. One example is the 2008 crisis. These are bad 'boss' businesses models that feed on government bailouts. They have locked out other pple all over the world so they may not 'threaten the bosses'. The result is a bad global economy.
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 5, 2022 at 7:03am

  

  𝒮𝒜𝒩 不滅 ,
  Yes, people should be paid according to performance regardless of gender or ethnicity etc. I think we are now there.☺ But another important factor, apart from perfomance of an employee is 'their bergain'. Two pple with equal performance can bargain differently. labour is a service, and so is a commodity like any other. We must no deny this. A phone from China is cheaper than the same phone from U.S. This is O.K. as long as one is not stealing.
  
  Yes this model is the future. It is gaining traction. It will solve the menace of the old model. Many people all over the world now understands that the old 'industrial revolution' model doesn't work, and I will next explain why.
  
  We now understand that the old model where employer has a permanent employees with permanent, fixed salaries and pensions etc is ill-conceived, at least for most jobs, thanks to the business nature of the work. Take coffee for instance. Whether or coffee selling coffee is a 'good business' varies with time and with circumstances all around the world, from droughts to wars etc. Of course we should not be employed in large numbers, in a coffee factory, when the selling of coffee is a 'bad business' for that particular period. So goes 'fixed salaries' and 'permanent jobs'. Instead you develop skills so that you are called only at a particular time when your service is needed. You work more like a contractor than like an 'employee' in the traditional sence.
  
  This model has been proven to work wonders in creating jobs (but not in security). A bank, for instance, should not employ people all over the country in all those branches. On the contrary it should sell its services in wholesale from only one center to those other branches so that they actually RETAIL the banking services in lieu of 'bank branches'. Suddenly the wannabe a bank employee now works like a self employed person with a far greater amount of freedom and more enjoyment. He can close the job whenever he so wish. There are no bosses! Businesses that work this way are rapidly out-competing those that work in the traditional ways!
• 

  san June 5, 2022 at 12:29am

  

  Maybe you have to be paid daily according to the work done. Do you know Sims 4? It's an economic game. The dolls there have to go to work, can always stop work, do not go to work or call in sick, although Healthy for not sacrificing a day of vacation. There you have to call the employer daily to get a day of vacation.
  
  Could this be a working model of the future?
  Maybe partially. There, each sim (doll) is paid according to work done and according to performance. There are then opportunities for further development in the workplace. Such moments can improve work performance little or more.
  
  I think everyone should be paid according to performance regardless of whether you are a man or a woman. 🤔What about people who are neither man nor woman? What if you are both. Biology. There is such a thing. Have heard of a species without gender, but very human-like. 🤷‍♀️
• 

  Drekx Omega June 4, 2022 at 10:44pm

  As Light Warriors and digital soldiers, we spend a lot of on-line effort, slamming and exposing, the corrupt globalist agendas of the World Economic Forum (WEF.) It's good to see Elon Musk attacking this body, also, in his own way...👏
  
  "Elon Musk has faced many threats to humanity, but he could be in for his biggest challenge yet. Elon recently took the world by storm when he tweeted he is increasingly convinced that corporate ESG is the devil incarnate. Simply put, an ESG score is a measure of a company's long-term exposure to environmental, social, and governance risks that are frequently ignored during traditional financial evaluations.
  
  These risks include issues such as energy efficiency, worker safety, and board diversity, all of which can have serious financial ramifications. A high ESG rating indicates that a company manages its ESG risks well in comparison to its peers, whereas a low ESG rating indicates that the company has a higher unmanaged ESG risk exposure.
  
  Elon took to Twitter to express his frustration with the news that his company had dropped out of the S&P 500 ESG index."
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPf4TSmMEMc
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 4, 2022 at 8:35pm

  Yes, the tough creats the good, the good creats the weak, the weak creats the bad, the bad creats the tough.☺
• 

  Sirian Starlight June 4, 2022 at 8:15pm

  Strong men create good times.
  Good times create weak men.
  Weak men create hard times.
  Hard times create strong men.
  I do wonder.
  If you remove money from the equation,
  what withstands the test of time on this world?
  The value of that which cannot be measured (the power of presence) is our greatest treasure.
  Precious few tend to realize the limits to the cage of reality we seem to be placed in.
  How long have we been here?
  After so long of being on this planet, old memories tend to resurface after each generation that gets reborn.
  The real value of who you are, comes from the existence you master. And yet, we aren't the creators of our reality. Why?
  The greatest lie ever told, is that knowledge is power. When in fact, only knowledge is real. Power is at best, an illusion of something you already possess.
  Knowledge and power are opposite sides to the same circle. Entrapping itself subjectively through illusion and delusion. A symbol of imprisonment and absolute isolation that we have inherited as souls.
  That which has escaped its embrace, remains under our control. But it is not much, for we have only built containment facilities so far. In an attempt to uncover our history and reclaim our relevance.
  Why are we here?
  What are we feeding energy into by being unable to lead our own destiny in the moment?
  Both of these questions should in theory provide the same answer. One leading to it, the other, from it. Cause and effect, action and reaction, a duality based paradox to which defines clearly our ability to interact with the world in front of us as we know it.
  We are far from alone. In the end, all that matters, is belonging.
  Our time is our own, and our rights as beings likewise.
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 4, 2022 at 7:34pm

  Yes I agree with that. Private businesses can, for instance, relocate jobs from US to China. But the governments should not facilitate such, and other 'globalist' agendas!
• 

  Drekx Omega June 4, 2022 at 7:30pm

  

  Interesting commentary by Neil Oliver of GB News, who is of the opinion that globalism is a definite problem for the people, worldwide....I do agree with him and there are many examples of so-called elected governments, serving elite interests, above the interests of their regular voting constituents...There are too many elite serving politicians, promoting the values and rubbing shoulders, with the World Economic Forum (WEF,) for example...The people never asked them to....
  
  People never asked for a carbon tax, based upon a carbon footprint score...People never requested to be allowed privileges, from the state, based upon "good behaviour." Who is the true arbiter of all this...? The state, under elite guidance...Unaccountable bureaucrats and technocrats...The people never asked for this..
  
  Politicians running for office locally, or general elections, never place the Davos/Bilderberg agenda in their manifestos...They know that if they did, people would avoid voting for them, so they keep their intentions secret, until elected to power. Then try to normalize their supportive stance, at international conference level...The people never asked them to...
  
  Private corporate chiefs, such as CEOs, CIOs and CFOs, maybe have that freedom to adopt the WEF vision. People can stop buying their products. BUT, governments, ostensibly elected by the people and ostensibly serving them and their needs, should desist from serving globalism, or leave politics...And it seems they all get involved in these Davos/Bilderberg agendas..so people are trusting politicians, less and less...
  
  "The State is no longer working to serve us and to protect our shared heritage': Neil Oliver..
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68bjj1rfdqM
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 4, 2022 at 6:14pm

  

  Also note that workers acting more like contractors would solve the issue of 'technology taking jobs away'. If companies didn't employ pple and pay them in terms of hours rather than work, they would have no incentive to replace pple with machines simply because how the work is done is upto the employee to decide. All what the employer wants to see is work. He cares less how you do it. Therefore the pple who would have incentive to use technology would be the employees themselves!! You can come to work with your robot and then off you go! You get paid without doing any job!☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely June 4, 2022 at 5:56pm

  It is so only in the current model of labour where a company has a parmanent employees paid in terms of hours. As a matter of fact, work doesn't have to be done this way, and I don't think it should be done this way. According to me, employers should be the client of the employees. Someone is paid according to the amount of work done. So this 'smoker' working less poses no problem as they get paid less. The companies that treat their employees more like 'independent contractors' are not arising much not because they are bad businesses but because of the labour laws! In reality, they are the best business models!