Some soldiers inaproprietly enters a Mosque in Jerusalem. Then gaza responds by firing thaosands of rockets to Israeli civilian cities. It is (correctly) condemned as a target to civilian. Then Israel retaliates by targeting the military (it is seen as their right and apororiate because it targets the hamas military wing rather than the civilians ). However the end results is that Israel kills more civilians that the Palestinians does! Call this one 'absurdity #1' It is just one of the myriads of absurdities in middle east!

Israelis Are Anti-Semite!

Isra-el means 'to wrestle with God'. An Israeli  (not Israelite) soldier invokes a picture of someone carrying a bag of bullets, grenades etc on the back, wearing several layers of bullet proofs on the chest, some hard lether tied on the knee, a thick helmet on the head, carrying a teriffying, thick and sophisticated gun, but wrestling with a un-armed, 13 year old boy! If there is any connection with the bible, then it only bring to mind the 'Goliath vs David'! This alone proves that these are not Semites! Semites are first and foremost, brave and shockingly fear less!.They go to a city with mere trumpets but determined to bring down the city! They trust in God, not weapons. There is no Semite who arms himself with an equivalent of a jet- fighter in a village for 'self security' purposes! Call this absurdity #2

Jews Are Not Yahweh's People

It is crucial that you know the difference between 'Israelites', 'Israeli' and 'Jew'. Israelites are ancient, lost tribes that were scattered by Assyrian Empire. Then the empire brought in inhabitants of Iraq and settled them in the province called 'Samaria'. Only the tribe of Juda and levi was left. However during the times of Nebuchadnezzar, Juda and levi too were scattered. Latter, some few were returned to Jerusalem so that it was now a mixture of various people from various parts of the empire. They correctly recognized that the concept  'Israel' no longer meant anything. So the land called 'Samaria' and Juda was named 'judea' and the far north was called 'Galilee'. The term 'jew' then was more of cultural and linguistic than ethnicity.

'Israeli', on the other hand is a confused concept that lacks knowledge and understanding. It insinuates that 'israel' rifers to a piece of land rather than descendants of Jacob! Call this absurdity #3

The bible highlights land policies that Yahweh's people must adhere to, and it seems this is universal to all Semites, including the so called 'Palestinians'. The simply non Semites are not against these. However, antisemites such as Israelis are very antagonistic to these policies. According to Torah, land primarily belongs to Yahweh, and not individuals. There is no such a thing as 'buying land'. We more or less lease it. The bible insist that we sell the crops in the land, but not the land itself. In the year of jubilee, we must return the land to whoever we bought from, if the person wants to buy it. It is an obligation. This is to say that if it were Semites that bought the land from Palestinians in 1900s or so, by 1940, the land should have been sold back to Palestinians if they so demand, for the bible says that 'though shall not oppress an alien living amongst you but you must treat them as one of you'. In other words even if Palestinians were 'immigrants' the Torah demands that they must be treated like Israelis! People who donnot obey Yahweh cannot possibility be Yahweh's people. Call this absurdity #4.

Palestinians Are Hebrews 

you hear it said that during the first Jewish Roman war, one million jews were killed and millions were scattered. Then  again in the second Roman-Jewish war, millions of them were scatterd. Then again during Hitler's time, 6 million of them were killed. Millions of them have been killed throughout where they were scattered. Make sense? Can a narrow and extreemly short strip of land in a hostile desert produce milions upon millions of people and scatter them all over the world?

A similar thing exists in the so called 'Arabs'. You are told that the 'Arab world' spans from morroco up to Yemen, almost a third of the world! In reality, the ethnic Arabs were a tiny group of people in Yemen who, seeing that they were very few and surrounded by hostile tribes begun a culture of 'Arabizing' people in order to create the illusion that they are many and thus deterring other tribes from exterminating them. Thus Ishmael in the bible is actually not the father of all Arabs. He was an Arabized Jew who met Arabs in the deserts of Arabia.

So most of the Palestinians were actually Arabized Jews. You cannot tell me that invaders were able to capture all jews from Galilee to Bethlehem and carry them away using who knows what. The scattering was actually done to as few as just 100,000 Jerusalemites. The rest of the Jews in rural areas, of course, could not be got. It is hard to capture even all rats or mice in your compound or even inside your own house, even with modern technolgy. Yet they want to tell me they could basket all jews from Judea to Bethlehem (ie intelligent humans) and scatter them like litter all over the world! Call this absurdity #5.

So this is what the fighters are doing! You left Your brother and went away and then latter came back, find him wearing a kufiya and some funny long dress, praying while facing Mecca, and you begine to fight him, claiming 'this is an Arab intruder!'

British Folly 

Lets say you are an American. What if one day china somehow takes over both Mexico and US. Since both countries are now under one empire, there is no more 'immigration law'. So Mexicans are encouraged to migrate to Texas and Carlifonia sinse, after all California was once part of Mexico. The mexicans now Migrates to Texas and Carlifonia with no limit? Does this sound like a good thing done to you, oh a Texan American? If yes, then why do you want an immigration law against Mexicans? If no, why do you uncritically support Israel that did the same thing?

But it is much worse in the case of Israeli. There is a reason why there was wars in ancient Palestine (eg jewish Roman wars). Whatever resulted from the wars may as well be better understood as 'natural selection', the kind of which that ensures that deserts are sparsely populated. Imagine a policy that persecute people in fertile places and then offer a 'solution' by encouraging them to migrate in large numbers to a narrow piece of land that is surrounded by an hostile desert, a land that is known to have been got up in bloody conflicts over scars resources. Can there be anything more stupid? Naturally people migrates from desserts to greener places so that deserts have smaller populations. But here, Europeans tried to force in a reverse migration, from fertile places to hostile places! The same Europeans like to brace themselves as the solution to this problem they created! Call this absurdity#6.

It is like a guy who keeps battering his wife. But then he says he loves her! The solution to the batterings, he suggests, is to send the wife to a distant place in the desert. 'Stay there, so I may not keep battering you, you know I love you too much, but err, er, I am battering you daily'. This is how Europeans, so they say, treats Jews. They love them so much, they provide jets and submarines. They condemn Palestinians for attacking them, and yet they tell us that they must leave there in Palestine to escape the persecutions from Europeans!! What garbage!