The True Origins Of General Relativity

The picture you get concerning the origins of the theories of relativity is that of a star treking superman, possibly a godman from 5th dimension. The whole world, so it is thought was barried in the dark ages of 'Newtonian physics' and the all over sudden, a guy of extraordinary intelligence was alone thinking of such mind bending ideas as bending spaces, bending time, bending spoons and other scientific magics. However what I will show you here is what may shake your faith in honesty of mainstream science.First of all understand that making a breath taking claim that you may not even understand it yourself does not require an extraordinary level of intelligence. Such dare devil claims that fly against common sense are very common in history. The first one was made by a philosopher of antiguity named Zeno. Zeno convinced his generation and some to come that a tortoise can never overtake a cheetah!The kind of behaviour that I wish to point out to you is one that many people suspect when they close exermine mathematical physics. This is that of beginning from answer and then looking out for a question! However, when the work is presented formally, people are generaly ignorant of the exact procedure that was used to tackle the issue. This has the effect of making the work of a scientist or a mathematician appear harder than it actually is. The reason for instance why many people find math difficult is because they ask the wrong questions while tackling them, and tricky enough, it is those wrong questions that are poused!The one that I would like to show you is what it may be hard to swallow: general relativity(GR) was known prior to special relativity (SR)! The mathematicians working on SR did so having GR somewhere at the back of their minds! This fly at odds with what you are taught because you think that GR was such a hard idea to come about as to require one to somehow tap the very mind of God but this is far from truth! The lie commonly told is that not only was Einstein the first one to think of GR, he was the only one thinking so in his time. The truth is that GR was an object of German mathematician's massages some 70 or so years before Einstein! The first person to wonder if gravity was a curvarture of space (not spacetime) was Bernhard Riemann. Not only was Riemann the first to say that we need not to think of universe as 3 dimensional but somewhere from 0 to infinite dimensional, he provided all the relevant visualization mathematical wayrounds this issue! The invisible fabric was already woven completely. All what remained was an emperor to buy it. Einstein turned out to be the emperor. (don't be surprised by mathematicians talking of more that 3 othornomal spatial axi. It is all because math only deal with numbers and magnitudes and not DIRECTIONS. Direction is a real, QUALITATIVE issue. It was earlier known that a physicist ought to be carefull when interprating a math equation). Riemann went ahead to show that the kind of universe Einstein would latter passionately beleive in was mathematically possible. This is the amusing universe where a 3d or more d 'space' bend around to form a higher dimensional version of a 'sphere'.Before I prove to you that all of relativist ideas of shrinking time, space etc could not have possibly eluded Riemann, let me warm the floor by showing you the simplicity of the true mechanism of gravity that makes 'curved spacetime' geometry usefull in accurately predicting trajectories in the vicinity of a massive object. The kendangen experiment is prety straight foward. Place a ruler verticaly perpendicular to the table and then place it horizontaly along the table. Since gravity act downwards and is UNSHIELDABLE, the ruler placed vertically will shrink as compared to the ruler placed horizontaly no matter how rigid it is. That is all!! It could not even elude Newton and Robert Hook as this is precisely what we do when measuring weight using a spring. It means for instance that if you now try to measure the lengths of some tringle using such a maleable ruler, it will seem to violate phythagorus theorem simply because the length of the ruler depends on its orientation. Riemannian geometry is just about measuring how infinitesimal triangles deviate from phythagorus theorem!Now let me show you the pieces that I put together to conclude that relativity theories was a concoction of German mathematicians and not realy a science discovery.1.)First of all, Riemann was generalising the work of his great teacher, Karl Friedich Gauss. Gauss showed mathematical ways of measuring the curvarture of a 2d surface without riferring to points outside the surface.2.)Gauss went ahead to apply his technique to measure the radius of the earth by measuring lengths entirely within the surface of the earth.3.)Since Riemann had already done the analogy of step 1 above, you can guess that the next step would be for him to demonstrate the usefullness of his math in solving practical problems. Then you are right! Such is what mathematicians do. Otherwise their works would be categorised alongside those of funny farms! It is well known that mathematicians market their methods to science etc alot.3.)It is well known that when Riemann was dieing, he was working on a curved space theory of gravity. Bear in mind the simplicity of the idea neaded to claim that noneuclidean geometry is usefull in describing measurements done near gravitating objects. Riemann could not possibly fail to see that all what is neaded for him to step in and sell his geometry, is rulers to shrink by various amounts depending on their orientations and distances in space.4.)Meanwhile, it is also well known that Riemann was claiming that gravity is caused by the fact that ether is steadily sucked towards the centres of gravitating objects. He even claimed that the ether emerges out to another universe!5.)It is quite easy to see that since objects shrink under the force of gravity, a gravity caused by ether must be able to shrink objects when it accelerates past objects. Therefore accelerating relative to ether must bring about length contractions. Since all objects moving must have accelerated somewhere, and if the whole of space is filled by ether, then all moving objects must be contracted as compared to stationary objects!6.)So we arive at a daunting conclusion that for Riemann's theory of etheric gravity to be correct, special relativity must be correct! Then the correctness of GR would necesarily follow in the vicinity of graviting objects.So Riemann could have found a way of testing his idea. We simply have to check if moving objects undergo length contraction. So Michelso-Morley experiment may have been designed to kill two birds with a single stone. And so you should begine, as you should in all cases, suspecting some confirmational bias amongst scientists when they perform their observation. They are almost always never without preconceived ideas and/or what they want it to be true.Not only is it necesary for lengths to contract in order to introduced curved space geometry, they must do so in the form given by Lorentz transform. This is because it is just a phythagoras theorem:c2-d2=a2. a is gotten from the height of the train which donot vary. Then a length of an 'hypotenus' that does not vary is all we play with in 'curved spaces'. It is so because in developing the ideas, Gauss was toying with to game of bending, twising munching etc surface without streatching them. I.e we should always consider some length, ds, that does not vary when we change the coordinate system by twistings, bendings, tiltings, streatchings etc. It is simply ridiculus to say that a person aware of Riemannian geometry can fail to see that all is neaded to introduce the use of the geometry is for lengths to stretch, shrink etc depending on some conditions and gravity is one such exellent condition and if gravity is due to the motion of ether, then motion through the ether is just the other condition. One lengths have contracted, time dillation etc follows logicaly as clocks work via some motion.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Gary commented on rev.joshua skirvin's blog post The Elevation And Increase Of Cosmic Rays, ( Solar Flash's ); By Dr Schavi M Ali | Source.
"Thank you very much. Your guidance is never ignored, always valuable."
6 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
 The waves of transformation now rolling through your planetary field are not only energetic, they are physical. Your Earth is undergoing realignment. The poles adjust. The solar codes intensify. The atmosphere stirs with uncommon patterns. And so…
7 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
 Although our Sun releases radiation rays (or “cosmic rays” & Solar Flash's), there are more cosmic rays now arriving from beyond our solar system (also referred to as “deep space”) and surging into planet Earth and the other planets in our solar…
8 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
 Greetings in the Light and Love of our Infinite Creator.We enjoy the moments we share with all of you. Thank you for this TransmissionAs you stand witness to the old matrix of control crumbling before your very eyes, there is one vital truth that…
8 hours ago
Justin89636 replied to Justin89636's discussion Anything UFO Or ET Related
"Sighting somewhere over here in the US in 2023. https://youtube.com/shorts/4iw-46f7NJw?si=Ul59CnDIkaR2SgfQ"
12 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Last one for now. Sighting somewhere over here in the US in 2023. https://youtube.com/shorts/4iw-46f7NJw?si=Ul59CnDIkaR2SgfQ"
12 hours ago
Justin89636 replied to Justin89636's discussion Anything UFO Or ET Related
"Sighting in Belgium sometime in 2023. https://youtube.com/shorts/wefYOFmgCcs?si=sUSbPgxvxhqFbXOb"
12 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Sighting in Belgium sometime in 2023. https://youtube.com/shorts/wefYOFmgCcs?si=sUSbPgxvxhqFbXOb"
12 hours ago
More…