When lightning was the only 'bright' thing we know of near us, humans insisted that the sun is nothing but some huge lighning balls. When humans discovered fire, they now changed the theory, insisting that the sun is a 'camp fire in the sky', powered by firewoods. When we discovered electricity, again, we updated our solar theory, insisting  that then sun is nothing but a huge bulb up there, with 'wires' supplying the electric energy, invisible. Finally when we discovered the nuclear energy, we now concocted the latest vodka! The sun is now a gigantic thermonuclear furnace! Thus our modern theory is, in no way, a distinct theory 'based on research and knowledge'. Neither should you be bamboozled by the modern technology, into thinking that 'if people knows how to unleash such a terror as a nuclear bomb, then they must be truely privy to the sun's secret'. Even the lighting of the first fire in the cave was a great technological advance. However, this does not mean that those who lite the fire were privy to the sun's secret. So just as we now laugh at the idea of a sun powered by firewoods, we should also not forget to laugh at an equaly ridiculous idea that the sun is a thermonuclear furnace!

Today I am going to show you one of the results of the 'we understand the sun' illusion. The picture above depicts how the sun rotates. As you can see, it is yet another acrobatics! The sun's equator rotates faster than its poles! Now make sure that your brain's 'nuts' are well tightened, and then think carefully about this. For the sun's equator to rotate faster than its poles, it has to overcome friction, meaning that constant energy input is required! The sun rotates like an ENGINE, and not like a top somehow spun only once in the distant future, and then left to do that for over millenniums, like they say in mainstream. If equator's rotation requires energy input, why not see the entire sun's rotation as to be driven by some energy? The 'conservation of momentum' explanation appears to me as weak in this instance. It is only strong if we don't see any source of rotational energy.

Now comes the mainstream explanation as to why the sun rotates differentialy. I may summarize it this way:
1.) The heat at the sun's core causes convection currents, which causes the fluid in the interior of the sun to move all the way up to its surface.
2.)The fluid that moves from the interior of the sun up to its equator encounters the fluid moving at a greater velocity than the fluid that moves from the interior to the poles.
3.)Therefore the sun's equator will rotate faster than its poles!

What a ridiculous explanation!!

The day you will boil water and then the 'convection currents' in the water somehow makes the whole water to stire around the centre of the cooker, then you can be sure that there must be a demon in your room, or perhaps you are witnessing the Pool Of Bethesda incidence!


The mainstream explanations does not come from any logic other than:

1.) The sun's differential rotation implies that input energy is required to power it.
2.)The only source of energy possible in the sun is the heat generated from its core!
3.) Therefore the ultimate cause of the sun's differential rotation must be the heat comming from the sun's core via convection currents!

As usual, and for understandable reason, no room is left for the possibility that we don't understand the source of the sun's energy hence an explanation that sources its energy from the interior must be swallowed, however absurd, because 'that is the only source of such a huge energy'!

Now lets begine with a static sun. Can heat from the center makes it rotate? Of course such will require magic! The only thing heat can do is to make the fluid churn around in a completely random way. Heat does not have any inherent rotational energy at all, that can somehow be 'biased' towards any particular direction. But what magic will it happen if we now begine to spin the sun? The heat energy will not aquire any rotational energy. The energy for rotation will come from the original kick, and original kick alone. The presence of convections merely superimposes the churning onto the rotation, making up a rotating, churning, hot ball, nothing more!

Using different words, begin by noting that the mainstream's explanation means that the heat energy from the core does, infact, adds angular momentum to the sun. This is because without the heat, the sun's equator would rotate at a slower rate. So the heat adds an angular momentum that is equal to the one needed to increase the equator's rotation! But angular momentum is a conserved quantity. This means that the mainstream's explanation demands that heat energy has an inherent, angular momentum that happens to be directed towards the direction of the rotating star!

The mainstream's explanation is nonsense because mechanically, you can make something moves faster only by hitting it with another object moving even faster. The sun's rapid movement st the equator cannot possibly be what causes itself to move even faster than itself! The only way for what they claim to happen would be for the fluid at the core to increase its speed as they move away from the center. But we know that the opossit infact happens! the more an object expands, the slowlier it rotates. This is due to the conservation of angular momentum.

What powers the sun's equator rotation cannot be heat! And so the sun has another powerful source of energy that is not considered in mainstream. Perhaps it is electromagnetism or gravity, or something completely unknown!!!

The Sun As An Homopoler Motor

But what if we say that the sun is actually an homopoler motor driven by an electric current that converges to the centre (much like the way 'electric universe' guys insist). Since the magnetic field runs from the north pole to the south (or vice versa), Then the explanation for the
rotational differential speed is now straight foward! This is because whenever a charge moves inside a magnetic field, the field exerts a force on the charge that is directed both perpendicular to the magnetic field, and to the direction of the charged particle, and which depends on the velocity of the charged particle (this is lorentz's force law). So if magnetic field points to the north, and the charge is moving downwards, then the charge will be forced to move eastwards (use the Fleming's Left Hand Rule to determine this). If the charge was moving downwards inside a conductor, then it forces the conductor itself to move eastwards. This is how electric motors works.

Now for the charge moving across the equator, all the way to the center, it will be forced to rotate at maximum speed, since at the equator, the moving charged particle cuts through the magnetic field perpendicularly. However, for the particles moving to the centre but across higher latitudes, the component of the particle's velocity, that is perpendicular to the magnetic field, is now smaller, with the component being exactly zero at the poles. In other words at the poles, the particles don't cross the magnetic field lines at all, they only move parallel to it. At higher latitudes, they cross the field lines, but at lesser rate than the way they cross it at the equator. At the equator, they cross the field lines at the fastest rate simply because they are crossing it perpendicularly, hence facing the shortest distance from one field line to the other. Since the lorentz's force law is about the velocity as in 'rate at which the particle crosses the magnetic field' and not 'rate at which the particle moves', we see that definitely, the charges crossing the equator will be deflected the most.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/DaringWelloffIndianabat-max-1mb.gif