What would you do if you were God?

I must first elude someone who will come and tell me they are God already. So in this discussion, God is a being who can litteraly say let there be an Andromedan boy right in front of you and voila! An andromedan pops infront of me to my surprise. So if you are God already, then you will be just the right I am looking for! So all you have to do is warm the floor me by bringing forth an Andromedan right before. If you have any other notions of God, then feel free to form your own discussion.As for me, if I were God, I would build a wonderfull home for you in heaven, there, you can leave forever, and bursk in my glory because I love you!:) I will glorify you to be God like me. Then you will command, let there be universe, let there be people, let there be elfs, let there be aliens, let there be UFOs visiting the earth, let there be no cabal, let there be piece, let there be love, let there be comfort, let there be no wars, let there be no foolishness, let there ROARING LIONS.

Hi Roaring....

I would maintain perfect consistency in letting each and every human know exactly, in no uncertain or confusing terms whatsoever, just what my attributes and personality were like. I would be consistently interacting with them across all populations over the entire expanse of time-to-present, so as perfectly delimit and demonstrate the actual facts involved in my being as the being that I am.

Everything else would be correctly and perfectly explained to each and all. No possible misunderstanding, disagreement, or secondary explanations would have ever arisen at all, because I would have been empirically and quite actively involved so as to disallow such totally. What I would do, however, is also make it clear, in no uncertain terms, that I was the being that exactly allowed their being, and by whatever design I chose.

Perfect knowledge of all that would have been pertinent and reasonable for the energy required for such a creation, and the maintenance of human beings, would have been taught to them, and who was responsible for their upkeep all along..

I would, make clear provision for the understanding, of the recycle of material principle, and by such neither fear of, nor regret for natural death or the death of a creature for food would ever have been. The beauty of each single item of creation would be fully understood and praised even during the act of death for food or natural death. However, due to the perfect knowledge, only natural death would be possible between the human creatures--by my personal intervention.

Fretting and disagreement may be potentially allowed, but never for much (perfect knowledge and understanding is maintained by all). Natural resources would never be bottlenecked or in limited supply, all human beings would act within the framework of a single unity of that level of life form, and in the recycle framework, levels will work specific to themselves.

Free will would be the ability to express and learn with individual preferences and wonder, allow men to make their own choices, their own mistakes. Making those mistakes and wrong choices is a good way of developing morality through their own reason and understanding.

Between all individuals there would be no force of any one belief, or faith, and yet they would be lead towards a belief, but more of wonderment to a better understanding of their condition which would lead to the creation of art, music, literature, philosophy etc...good ways to live their lives.

"I've always distrusted the catholic church, now and going back through many previous lives...And the current Pope has not assuaged my distrust of churchianity......and I use that term, as many of these "followers," as they might see themselves, seem…"

"Earth Alliance, using Trump's presidency, is destroying the dark cabal's energy matrix, taking control of the strait of Hormuz does just that....Now Iran cannot receive solid rocket booster fuel from China and send oil to China, as just two…"

Replies

Light Being June 16, 2013 at 6:50pm

Hi Roaring....

I would maintain perfect consistency in letting each and every human know exactly, in no uncertain or confusing terms whatsoever, just what my attributes and personality were like. I would be consistently interacting with them across all populations over the entire expanse of time-to-present, so as perfectly delimit and demonstrate the actual facts involved in my being as the being that I am.

Everything else would be correctly and perfectly explained to each and all. No possible misunderstanding, disagreement, or secondary explanations would have ever arisen at all, because I would have been empirically and quite actively involved so as to disallow such totally. What I would do, however, is also make it clear, in no uncertain terms, that I was the being that exactly allowed their being, and by whatever design I chose.

Perfect knowledge of all that would have been pertinent and reasonable for the energy required for such a creation, and the maintenance of human beings, would have been taught to them, and who was responsible for their upkeep all along..

I would, make clear provision for the understanding, of the recycle of material principle, and by such neither fear of, nor regret for natural death or the death of a creature for food would ever have been. The beauty of each single item of creation would be fully understood and praised even during the act of death for food or natural death. However, due to the perfect knowledge, only natural death would be possible between the human creatures--by my personal intervention.

Fretting and disagreement may be potentially allowed, but never for much (perfect knowledge and understanding is maintained by all). Natural resources would never be bottlenecked or in limited supply, all human beings would act within the framework of a single unity of that level of life form, and in the recycle framework, levels will work specific to themselves.

Free will would be the ability to express and learn with individual preferences and wonder, allow men to make their own choices, their own mistakes. Making those mistakes and wrong choices is a good way of developing morality through their own reason and understanding.

Between all individuals there would be no force of any one belief, or faith, and yet they would be lead towards a belief, but more of wonderment to a better understanding of their condition which would lead to the creation of art, music, literature, philosophy etc...good ways to live their lives.

This reply was deleted.

Replies

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.