Replies

• 

  Amelia May 25, 2010 at 1:19am

  Getting money for reporting is one thing. If any of the information in those paid only reports is vital for the good of the populous, withholding it for money seems pretty selfish. If it is just like a magazine subscription, with relevant information, though not vitally important for the good of the civilization, fine.
  
  He used to have a good job with Forbes. He has a good resume, why does he need internet dues?
  
  He can go on and on about the death threats he receives, but the only word to back this is his own. I neither believe nor disbelieve this, but it would be a good ploy to enact sympathy and garner more donations.
  
  Benjamin, like the channelers, is one of those, "any-day-now-the-world-will-change-and-I-know-why," guys. When I first started reading him, I ate it up. Now I take it with a couple of grains of salt. You can only promise a complete turn-over of government a couple of times a year before you start to look a bit phony in my eyes...
• 

  Amelia May 25, 2010 at 12:38am

  I see no reason why it can't be free.
• 

  Amelia May 24, 2010 at 10:23pm

  I don't like how they think people need to pay for the "good" info. Light should shine regardless of how much it costs. Ja provides.
• 

  Super7DsMom May 24, 2010 at 2:55am

  I had a very funny feeling about this when it first happened... I read just a few weeks ago about the Bildabergs where having a meeting upset about how us in the US are only paying 3.00 a gallon for gas and everyone else is paying 10..and how can they get us up to the same amount! Funny I heard that and then this happens, again right at the begining of the summer time when most people will travel for summer vaction..they will have and excuse to raise the price again. I also heard and as soon as I find it again in black and white somewhere that the gov here in the US are montoring the news comming into the US from forgien countries as well.
  • 

    Jayne59 > Super7DsMom May 24, 2010 at 12:58pm

    Hey We Are All Angels, where did you see Ben's story on this? I've been watching for his take and as of yesterday, he hadn't posted anything new on his site. I use Benjaminfulford.net and a paid member. Thanks!
    
    Jayne
• 

  Andrew Katz May 24, 2010 at 2:29am

  There is a great likelihood that the oil rig platform of deliberately destroyed. But there is no connection to evacuating masses of people. This is the biggest environmental disaster to date in the world and it has been under reported. But even so, the impact would be that people cannot use the beaches and fishermen cannot bring in their harvests. That would be an economic impact of huge proportions costing local economies billions of dollars. But I think the true fall out of this disaster is a good one. And that is, that people will finally realize that we need to stop relying on oil for energy and transportation.