(NaturalNews) After examining what Medicare was billed versus what it paid to clinicians, researchers from the UCLA Department of Urology and the Veterans' Health Administration discovered what has been described as "very surprising." Based on their findings, it would appear that they've stumbled upon the reason why some high-earning physicians are making top dollar: Quite simply, it is because they're pushing more services per patient than they are actually treating them or seeing new patients.(1)Could this explain the frustrations that many patients feel when some medical professionals hastily offer them a new service, rather than taking the time to fully assess their condition?"With clinicians making more not by seeing more unique patients, but by providing more services per person, additional research needs to be done to determine if these additional services are contributing to improved quality of care," said Dr. Jonathan Bergman, first author of the letter that details the discovery. "These findings suggest that the current health care reimbursement model -- fee-for-service -- may not be creating the correct incentives for clinicians to keep their patients healthy. Fee-for-service may not be the most reasonable way to reimburse physicians."(1)Dr. Bergman is also a urologist and bioethicist at the Veterans' Health Administration-Greater Los Angeles as well an assistant professor of urology and family medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.Compromising quality healthcareThe letter, titled "Service Intensity and Physician Income: Conclusions From Medicare's Physician Data Release," was published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. The letter states the following:These data indicate that higher-earning physicians earn more not by treating more patients but by offering more services per beneficiary. The relationship between these additional services and any meaningful improvement in outcomes is undefined. ... In Medicare's fee-for-service system, some physicians are collecting large fees by ordering services munificently.(2)It also suggests that the fee-for-service model may not be ideal, raising the question of whether or not it could jeopardize the level of care that a patient receives:For instance, advising a patient that she does not need a computed tomographic scan often takes more skill and time, and may represent higher quality of care, than ordering a scan or performing a service.(2)According to Medicare.gov, Original Medicare coverage consists of Part A and Part B. The website explains that Part A pertains to things like hospital care, hospice and home health services. Part B, according to the site, primarily covers that which is deemed medically necessary, such as "Services or supplies that are needed to diagnose or treat your medical condition and that meet accepted standards of medical practice."(3,4) It is data from Part B which was studied by the UCLA researchers and what led them to express their concerns in the published letter."Our findings suggest a weakness in fee-for-service medicine," said Dr. Bergman. "Perhaps it would make more sense to reimburse clinicians for providing high quality care, or for treating more patients. There probably shouldn't be such wide variation in services for patients being treated for the same conditions."(1)Is the fee-for-service model synonymous with excessive expenditures and fraud?The fee-for-service model also raises questions about potential fraud and less-than-ethical billing habits.For example, Charles Hugh Smith wrote in a DailyFinance article that the model oozes with eyebrow-raising techniques. He explains an instance in which his mother had a one-hour foot procedure that required local anesthetic and that the $2,000 recovery room fee seemed awfully steep for what was comprised of her sitting in a chair while waiting to be taken home. Recovery rooms, he says, are meant for those who were given general anesthesia, not for people who had a local anesthetic.(5)So, what's Smith getting at?"The point here isn't whether this particular fee met Medicare guidelines; the point is that the fee-for-service model provides powerful incentives to pad bills or even commit fraud," he wrote. "Indeed, poor medical practices net providers more money. According to a recent report, only 3% of the millions of charges submitted to Medicare are reviewed, and over 10% of Medicare's $453 billion in annual expenditures are outright fraud."(5)He also explains that these "perverse incentives" don't help patients make wise decisions, such as whether or not they should opt out of unnecessary procedures or pursue more affordable services. "It's like going to an auto mechanic and agreeing to pay for whatever services he deems necessary, at whatever price he chooses, with no penalties to the provider if the service is poor."(5)Sources:(1) http://www.newswise.com(2) http://archinte.jamanetwork.com(3) http://www.medicare.gov(4) http://www.medicare.gov(5) http://www.dailyfinance.comLearn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048150_doctors_medical_fraud_healthcare_fees.html#ixzz3NWoIIWfK

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • What Doctors on the fiddle ? They have been for ages ...if they cure you then they lost control of you and lost their income ...they give you medicine that has side effects so your life is in their hands and you are under their control..they are more cunning then foxes.
    One in Three patients undergo surgery or have body parts removed that was not really necessary plus one in five patients die under evil doctors treatments
This reply was deleted.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 06/20/2026 by EraOfLight — Leave a reply Greetings. We are The Arcturian Council. We are pleased to connect with all of you.We have so much to share with all of you about your contact experiences. Many of you are starting to remember…
2 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 06/20/2026 by EraOfLightGreetings to you! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am KejRaj!The greatest sign of the shift is not what is happening in the world. It is the growing number of souls who refuse to abandon love despite…
3 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 06/20/2026 by EraOfLight — Leave a reply One of the greatest misconceptions surrounding extraterrestrial contact is the belief that encounters occur randomly. From a higher-dimensional perspective, most contact experiences are…
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega replied to Justin89636's discussion Anything Health Related
"About the US intel files released, just prior to Gabbard leaving her role...."Millions were LIED TO!’ | New files REIGNITE claims that Congress were misled over Covid origins.."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5zqu_FgiiU"
5 hours ago
Edward left a comment on Comment Wall
"Have a nice weekend...................."
13 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Music for your soul.
"Soulista & Polose - What I Feel🛸🎵🎶✨✨🌎✨✨✨💜🩶💛✨✨✨👏🏻😎

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgy337c8glw"
15 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Labour did not glean the Wakerfield seat, Burnham did and his election posters did not even mention the Labour party....They voted Burnham, to remove Starmer....So the whole thing was more like a "presidential election," rather than a British MP…"
20 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"It's a revelatory report that Gabbard released....My only disagreement with it, is it's statement that the leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was an "unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic."..I think it was DELIBERATE and…"
21 hours ago
More…