Spiritual Forum

Be - ness appears in Being thus naming Be - ness in process - as Being.

All that appears is Being in, under and among Being.

That includes even thoughts and thoughts of thoughts thus also referring to unfolded possibilities of Being.

The self conscious I in this process appears as if it would be a subject managing the unfolding of Being.

But the truth is different - the I is not the actor, but a witness only of something going on.

The I only thinks it would act, but actually does not.

This is, what happens - within the I Being itself while hiding Be - ness is finding itself by self reference thus appearing as consciousness. Again - Being is finding itself by self reference.

The truth is, consciousness happens within an I, but not by it.

The I must think it is the manager of consciousness telling "I think, therefore I am coscient" in order to separate from other I entities. Later the separation act is considered as enough thus leading the opposite way of inclusion. Or more simple - first the I must find itself by separation, later it must lose itself by inclusion.

This happens as illusion, as if the I is most important. One reason is maybe the funnyness of Being loving games and even nonsense.

And this is the reason the I illusion is able to lead to Ego games.

There is no real need to kill the Ego.

It is more effective to view the role of I as illusion.

And btw, there is also no need of reaching higher grades of Being, as if a higher grade would be a better grade. Being unfolds as it want to unfold, and it even finds itself as it want to find itself. The I has no influence in this regard as supposedly important institution. It is only illusion appearing very realistic.

The I is only a place in space and time, in which consciousness happens. That`s it.