Sure, claiming the Moon is artificial might sound crazy, but why does it ring like a bell when struck?
Previous expeditions to the Moon have brought back considerable amount of information, but our planet’s natural satellite still remains mostly a mistery for researchers. The first man ever invested by NASA to head the Commission of Lunar Exploration, Dr. Jastrow, referred to the Moon as “ the Rosetta stone of the planets.”
Many UFOlogists are convinced that the Moon, who everybody believes to be a natural satellite, was in fact built by a more advanced civilization as a study base where they could document the behavior of our species.
Others believe the aliens aren’t that interested in our society as they don’t understand intra-racial violence, so the Moon serves as a simple watchtower that would let them know if mankind would ever try to leave Earth and travel through space.
Moderate theorists say its body is covered by a rocky layer, which could measure more than 3 miles from the surface, sitting on top of a shell, made out of extremely durable chemical components, that could even withstand a large scale impact like with an asteroid or a comet without sustaining much damage.
A NASA researcher named Robin Brett once stated that : “It seems easier to explain the non existence of the Moon than its existence.”
Here are some strange facts that make us believe the Moon was actually built from scratch.
In 1969, the United States built a module for the sole purpose of crashing it into the Moon in order to study the after effects. The estimated power it packed upon impact was said to be that of one thousand Kilograms of TNT. After the controlled crash, experts observed the waves generated by the shock and were amazed. The Moon made a sound resembling that of a gigantic bell, and the echo went on for more than half an hour.
Ken Johnson, the man supervising photo and information stated that the Moon also vibrated or “wobbled” in a symmetric manner, “ almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic damper struts inside it” .
Alexander Shcerbakov and Mikhail Vasin published an article sometime in the 70s, named “Is the Moon the creation of Alien Intelligence?” In the article, they ask some very legitimate questions and expose known facts that defy any logical explanation. The surface of the Moon, the only part that could be studied, contains minerals and is mostly made up of uncommonly hard matter.
Samples retrieved from the Moon have also been found to hold forged metal material, which couldn’t have formed there or arrive by itself. Scientists found parts of highly processed Uranium that science has never been able to achieve via natural processes. They have also found traces of radioactive metals normally used to produce Plutonium on a large scale. This is all clear evidence that the Moon is not as inactive as we’re being led to believe.
It is common knowledge that our moon doesn’t have a hard nucleus as other planets or natural satellites do and the mass is concentrated in a number of points, most of which are located at a very low depth.
Another well known fact is that the Moon is older than 4 and a half billion years, which makes it older than our planet by almost a million years. It is different from any other satellite known across the universe. Unlike any other natural satellite, the moon describes a perfect round orbit around the planet it’s circling. No matter which point you look from, one side of the moon will always be invisible.
Titanium, a very rare and expensive metal on Earth, used for the development of advanced technology (space shuttles or submarines), is found in large and concentrated quantities inside rocks on the moon. Harold Urey, a Nobel prize winning chemist, is still very confused by this fact.
Strange facts as the ones you’ve just read keep piling up every day, while modern science keeps failing to explain them. Not only is the amount of information about the moon very scarce, but the percentage of people with access to it is being kept under control.
Source UFOHOLIC.com & YouTube
Replies
For the purposes of communication, the word 'artificial' strictly mean 'man made'. It is not proper to lable things that were there before man as 'artificial' even if they show the signs of the works of an intelligent being. There is a tendency to lable things that seems done with intent as 'artificial'. This habbit is question begging. The modern science has taught us to think this way but it is ultimately a flawed way of thinking and the fruit is now beginning to manifest in physics. When we lable 'natural' this way, we 'artificialy' remove mind apriori from fundamentaly reality without a justifyable reason.
When we experiment with plasma in laboratory, soon we begine to see things that look 100% like galaxies, galaxy filaments, DNA etc! Yes in that sense, galaxies look artificial! This 'artificial'-'natural' dichotomy is superficial. If we saw a motor prio to invention of man, we would be saying motors are natural occurances! It has much to do with PSYCHOLOGY than the PHYSICS out there. Or in short we can't say what is or what is not natural by merely looking at the thing!
Hellen, I wrote a blog on this important subject of the moon, way back in July 2011, in which I used the term of "titanium ball from planet Maldek."
Here is the link, which describes the origins of this artificial satellite, which has not always orbited earth, and was once sited in orbit around a planet in this solar system that is now destroyed and has left traces in the asteroid belt....
http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/the-moon-is-a-titan...
According to Cobra .The Moon is a natural object which has an orbit that is locked to the Earth and is quite a natural ocurrance through most of the solar system .It has been hollowed out,but it has been honey combed,which means that there have been tunnels dug below the surface of the moon.There have been tunnels expanded through the natural lava tubes,under - ground cities and various civilizations have been using those for quite quite extended periods of time and I would say its a natural satellite .Its nothing artifical about the moon,yes,it has been used for many purposes in the past..
Roaring...Maybe you have a fault...Check it out with Ben-Arion.....My settings do allow all to post, though under moderation...Still have not seen your comment for approval.. OK...Drekx
Hello dear Ivy.......No, I had already checked My Settings and it is set to Everyone.....So in theory all can post comments, but must be approved first...So far I have not seen a posting by Roaring Lovely...
Of course I have no need to restrict it to just friends, if moderated....So had not done so...
Roaring, you are welcome to post on the Deva blog....It is open to all, though moderated, so you can post and I'll approve, once checked...
http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/an-introduction-to-...
It is very clear that the creation following the commands in Genesis was not that of surreptitiously pulling matter out from a void. Rather, the heavens and the earth were already there. Genesis does not tell us how God created the heavens and earth, nor does it say when. It just states that he did it in the beginning.
It is also clear that God was not alone in Genesis. The word from Hebrew translated to 'God' as used in Genesis is 'Elohim' which is a plural. Who were these other accompanying? I think Psalm 148:5 answers it, together with giving an hint of how exactly the creation was done:
"...he commanded and they were created"
So the words that apply in our modern world for 'God' is a head/commander of a very powerfull civilization termed 'Elohim'. The commander was not talking to a void, as the snake oil pedlers of modern interpratation will like us to beleive. Rather, Psalms indicates that the commander was talking to angels, commanding them to creat heavenly bodies.
Finally Hebrews 11:3 clears the confusion regarding ex nihilo nihil.
"by faith, we understand that the universe was created at God's command so that what is seen did not come from what was visible"
Great! We know nowadays from quantum field, that this is possible. The quantum field is 'what was not visible' which is orders away from saying: 'what was not there.
Yes, a type 2 civilization is capable of creating moons! They can also destroy moons and planets to be used to create Dyson Spheres. A type 3 civilization can creat suns! It is possible that the entire solar system is artificial. Infact, there is realy no explanation for its origin. The story of mainstream termed 'nebular hypothesis' is full of problems. It only keeps kicking because somehow, the mainstream scientists cannot imagine any better alternative. So when you say:
"It is easier to explain moon's non existence than its existence"
bear in mind that there is a more daunting question:
"What can we realy explain for that matter?"
The much more hypothetical, type 5/6 civilizations can altogether circumvent the 'laws of physics'!! These ones can creat big bangs and big crunches. Infact, physicists are now seriously considering that perharps the universe is a computer simulation. In other words, it is reasonable to suppose that the entire universe itself is artificial.
Q: What do we realy know?
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next