You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"Dorothy Eady believed herself to be a reincarnated Bentreshyt, a priestess at Abydos temple..."
"😁Fun in ancient Egypt...they did enjoy dancing, back in the day...🎵🎶✨✨🌎🛸✨✨✨💜🩶💛✨✨✨👏🏻😉..enjoy..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv_I-6dJ9p8"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv_I-6dJ9p8"
"Thanks Andro! That sounds interesting, I’ll look into it.."
"Thanks Andromedaner-"
"I just watched "The Mummy" with Rachel Weisz and had to listen to the excerpt from the Audio book. Sounds great AE!
This Movella, reminds me of Dorothy Eady (Omm Sety), a British woman who remembered to be an Egyptian priestess from Pharaoh Seti…"
This Movella, reminds me of Dorothy Eady (Omm Sety), a British woman who remembered to be an Egyptian priestess from Pharaoh Seti…"
"great voice over"
u exist upon the Earth with great purpose,2 assist n the awakening &ascension of humanity,4 these r the final days of the current realit
Greetings! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am KejRaj!If you are reading this message, it is not by chance but by design. Spirit is reaching out to you. Spirit wants you to remember; You did not incarnate on Earth empty. You arrived…
This is Movella's recolection of her life as the Pharoah Taursret!
Audio clip-I Was Tausret: A Past Life Discovered Through The Akashic…
Replies
"A set of beleifs that attempts to connect humanity to spirituality"
Science on the other hand is just objective knowledge.
It is easy stated than done. A real coffee time is how do we obtain this objective knowledge. It is here where 'scientific method comes' in. Because scientific method is a method ultimately done by a fallible human being, science can never fail to have its own shortcommings. It is here where science can ultimately bear the hallmark of a religion.
Science has realy never been done as simply observation and deductions. If it were so, indead it could stear away from religion. Modern scientist simply doesn't do that. He rather begines by making an hypothesis based on how he thinks the universe works!! This was clearly done by Darwin, Einstein, String theorists, Inflation theorists, Supersymmetry theorists etc. Our guy then DEDUCE the inevitable consequences of his theory, (which he calls it by a fancy name, 'prediction') then goes out to look for evidences that matches the prediction, phew!
You gotta be able to smell from far that this method is 100% identical to 'religion'!! Our scientist is gonna use the prediction to INFERE that his otherwise unobservable factors are infact true. But what is the difference btwn this and a theory of god?? The example of unobservable factors are:
i)The extreemly slow evolution
ii)Field
iii)wavefunction
iv)fundamental particles
v)curved spacetime
vi)Dark matter
vii)Fourth dimension
viii)26 dimensions
ix)Big bang
x)Black holes
xi)inflation
the list is endles. Ergo in this sense science IS a religion!!
Thanks for understanding this subtle fact. Science have ended up claiming that they can chew buble gum and yet you smell croundnuts.
"A scientific claim is not to be taken by faith but must be open to questioning and critizisism"
But what does it mean to talk of a last man standing battle when only a single guy is allowed in the ring??
TRUE SCIENCE
It must train students to learn how to reason for themselves. To know how to seive sense from nonsense. Or in short, to become the true scientists that they are preaching about. But only the church, as in Jehovah witness, fear to bring the magazine of say the Seventh Day Adventist to their church. This unambiguously shove the chameleon of science squarely under the folder of religion.
Yes, science ITSELF is a religion.