Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-nfRDdDrjyk for video
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-nfRDdDrjyk for video
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
…
Replies
THANK YOU FEATHER WINGER!!
REMEMBER MY 2013 ISON COMET PREDICTION?? My 2013 Comet ISON prediction called for people in the military to start disobeying orders!!!!!
Click http://rt.com/news/ukraine-military-russia-resign-437/.
I think I may be getting better at this astrology stuff.
Malcolm, you are EXCELLENT!
Russia is preventing the Rothschild criminals and their associates from keeping their Ponzi scheme intact via creating a Ukraine Federal Reserve with EU controls. The videos displayed on sites such as Infowars.com clearly show Nazi symbolism on the EU supporter's signs in the Ukraine, along with interviews of these Ukraine EU supporters who state they support the Nationalist Socialist Party of Hitler! Note also that Hitler's Nationalist Socialist Party was backed by the Rothschild family of banks at time of inception.
I have yet to see you or "Acute Observer" offer any videos or verbatim to support the art of words that are displayed. My chihuahuas do a better job at alerting me when stray cats are outside my door, and they are just as annoying as both of you.
The question from the heckler is as desperate as Malcolm trying to make something out of it.
Come on people... it's a funny video! & try not to forget rule #62: Don't take yourself too seriously! ;-)
'Lighten'Up101
Stick: In re to your video: Wow! A movie star! (Loves the limelight).
When someone asks me if I believe in little green men from Mars, I say "NO."
I DON'T AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION BY TREATING IT AS A STUPID JOKE, WHICH IS A TACTIC USED TO AVOID ANSWERING A QUESTION THAT MAY INCRIMINATE YOU IF YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION INCORRECTLY.
But that is not how the question was asked.
The question to you would be more like "Can you tell us about your plans about raping half of humanity and killing the rest with the help of little green men from mars?"
If you were to have answered NO on that question you'd effectively have confirmed that there is such a plan, but that you can not talk about it. The only way for you to get out of that situation and continue with your speech would be to either take it for the joke it sounded like or adress the issue in its entirety.
You'd have done the same as Obama in this case I believe.
You're full of caca Acute Observer, because that is not how I would have answered the question.
YOU REALLY SHOULD BE A LAWYER. YOU ARE RESPONDING WITH A NICE TWIST OF WORDS, A NICE CHANGE OF WORDING, AND NICE ART OF WORDS. ALSO YOU PRESENT A NICE TRY AT AVOIDING THE ANSWERING OF A SERIOUS QUESTION
Nuclear war is nothing to laugh about, and I would not have answered the question that way if I was in Obama's shoes. Stop trying to pretend that situations are the way you believe they are.
"You're full of caca Acute Observer, because that is not how I would have answered the question."
So how would you answer it? :)
"YOU REALLY SHOULD BE A LAWYER."
There are a lot of immoral things I could be quite good at and that would make me a millionaire at the expense of the rest of the world, and that I say no to since they are not compatible with the future I want to see. I'm poor by choice, technically speaking.
"ALSO YOU PRESENT A NICE TRY AT AVOIDING THE ANSWERING OF A SERIOUS QUESTION "
The question here were answered in the very first comment of this thread my Michael.
You didn't buy that answer however wheres further discussion is nescessary before you get the comparison we're now using to exemplify your question. (forgive my terrible spelling. I get worse and worse on it for every year that goes, (reversed learning?:) ))
But again, How would you answer the question:
"Can you tell us about your plans about raping half of humanity and killing the rest with the help of little green men from mars?"
I'd like to know.
(perhaps we should suffice to run this part-discussion only once in this thread, instead of in 2 places simultaneously?)
I have no such plans that you have described, and you still re-word and change questions asked and twist words and statements into different meanings from the way posted by the individual posting on this website.
Now go to law school like a good massDebater that you are, because you like to make statements and observations with no outside evidence, no outside video, and no verbatim except that which comes from your fingertips on your keyboard based on your so called "acute observations" (and nothing more).