Doesn't fit the global village scenario-baraq hates americans anyway
Ebola: are thermal scanners effective prevention tools or just a placebo?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/01/ebola-prevention-thermal-scanner-effective-placebo
Devices meant to detect high body temperatures as a clue for infectious diseases may prove more reassuring than effective
http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/obamas-priority-not-protecting-americans/
OBAMA'S PRIORITY: NOT PROTECTING AMERICANS
Thomas Sowell: He takes 'citizen of the world' role more seriously than role as president
The Ebola outbreak in West Africa is both a danger in itself and a wake-up call for Americans – about President Obama, about the institutions of this country and, most important, about ourselves.
There was a time when an outbreak of a deadly disease overseas would bring virtually unanimous agreement that our top priority should be to keep it overseas. Yet Barack Obama has refused to bar entry to the United States by people from countries where the Ebola epidemic rages, as Britain has done.
The reason? Refusing to let people with Ebola enter the United States would conflict with the goal of fighting the disease. In other words, the safety of the American people takes second place to the goal of helping people overseas.
As if to emphasize his priorities, President Obama has ordered thousands of American troops to go into Ebola-stricken Liberia, disregarding the dangers to those troops and to other Americans when the troops return.
What does this say about Obama?
At a minimum, it suggests that he takes his conception of himself as a citizen of the world more seriously than he takes his role as president of the United States. At worst, he may consider Americans’ interests expendable in the grand scheme of things internationally. If so, this would explain a lot of his foreign policy disasters around the world, which seem inexplicable otherwise.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/obamas-priority-not-protecting-americans/#WiyFJ3w0k7FyczQ7.99
Replies
Please offer proof Britain has banned people from ebola infected countries from entering that country. I cannot seem to find anything about it.
Oh no .. Don't tell me I've reacted to yet another lie from the Rock-factory? ;)
I think it may be time to allow "Legion" to shatter these rocks for good.
'The Rock Factory' I like it Acute Migraine, I mean Observer?
No, you were right the first time. I am Acute Migraine, at least to You every time you post things that aren't true. When you post things that are true, you may not even see me in your thread. I'll be there, but I will have nothing to add. :)
LOL ;)
But what about: "The CHILDREN"...?!
They will be sold to the highest bidder when the time is right. ;)
"President Obama has ordered thousands of American troops to go into Ebola-stricken Liberia, disregarding the dangers to those troops and to other Americans when the troops return."
So what are you suggesting?
That your troops should not be allowed to come home (or that they shouldn't have taken the job in the first place in trying to contain the outbreak)?
That you should leave them in the hell-holes they've been sent to, to die even if they're not sick?
I wonder how the general public would react to that?
Especially since you've (the USA) made yourself big with the one-liner "we do not leave our people behind".
It sure sounds like you very much would like to leave your people behind, at least in This case. :)
Mainstream America is too busy watching Monday Night Football and trying to find out the cost of George Clooney's wedding. They could give a rat's a$$ about what is going on in west Africa, until it lands in their neighborhood.
Speak for yourself, bucko. Americans are taking the ebola outbreak very seriously and for you to say otherwise is dishonest.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next