A day or two ago Pet Rock made a post: "ISIL (ISIS) pamflet provides islamic state guidelines for ownership of christian sex slaves", and I also contributed with some videos and links.
That post is deleted, although there was no insults or any "ugly words" between contributors, and it is deleted even from the records of my own cabin.
WHY AND WHO DID IT?
Replies
In the first place my statement is not an argument...it's advice. In the second place if you do not want to take that advice that's on you but expect to get your posts deleted for being offensive to others...it's your choice.
Again, I can only say that here was no insults or argument in that post, just two opposed opinions. Censorship is so anti.......
What many of you fail to recognize is there are nearly 14,000 members on this site [of which some are of the Muslim faith] and when you disparage a certain group you are alienating them and that tends to upset them which is perfectly understandable. You're entitled to your opinion but you must phrase it in a way that's not so offensive to others.
hi folks, my two cents i am sharing.
many people cannot handle extreme in your face truth that was not sugar coated. and THEIR hiding head in the sand does not help their inner peace, just gives them disheartened despair that a betrayal is in their face again.
we all cover our backs with sayings to ourselves, we are alright.
life on this h*llhole planet, from the plants to the animals it is blunt and real, hunt, eat, or die.
WE ARE NOT ALONE ANYMORE PERIOD.
PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG ABOUT 35 FOOT HUMANS, AND THOSE ELONGATED SKULL HUMANS FOUND AND DOCUMENTED ALL OVER THE PLANET H*LLHOLE.
blessings to all of us for we are all one
I remember that post, and it was actually offensive since it insinuated that the problem was with Muslims in general and not with the fanatics as such. I commented and pointed that out even.
In short: You can probably post it again and also have it remain, if you reword it slightly so that it isn't so obvious in the post that you don't like Islam as such.. ;)
The only thing that is obvious is that you did not read comments that I made or links, otherwise you would not say such a thing.
On the contrary, if you examine links from that post (see above), you will see that my point was quite different from what you just said, as I proved with various links that ISIS (ISIL) and other militant islamic groups have actually been formed by CIA,Mosad, british intelligence under jesuit control, who by the way turned islam into militant religion under their guidance, support and planning, as Islam is originally peaceful, as you can also see from one of links. Recently many children from Pakistan have been killed in their school, by Isil forces. Those kids were also muslims, isn't that strange?
My point is that muslims around the globe are also victims of the Illuminati, as there are now more then enaugh evidence that all evil done in "the name of islam" in recent history, even deeper in the past (starting hundreds of years ago) were orchestrated and organized by kabal forces that used islamic leaders to start unjustified wars.
Unfortunatelly, somebody did not like that opinion here, even less liked the evidence
You are absolutely correct, Happy Person in saying that ISIS/ISIL were formed by CIA, Mosad and British intelligence. Oh, my, the "terrorists"! (Recent invention).
This article also proves my point
http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/the-congressional-rep...
I wondered the same thing but I think ben thinks the post might insight violence against muslims or something like it-it wasn't anti muslim it was anti 8th century sharia law-enabling men to have fellatio or intercourse with children-buying captured Christian women and girls and owning them and claiming that allah allows this-I'm trying to insight the left to grow a pair and stand with moderates and go apeshit on the radical islamists by using media
You should focus more on posts that support Obama's bombing campaign then. It's the most efficient weapon we have against those people today since the only other alternative to terminate ISIS would be to fire-blanket the areas they currently control, killing everyone there, civilians and terrorists alike.
Mainstream media already covers the atrocities of ISIS, so.. We (the alternatives) don't really have to. We can focus on allowing the intervention go forth for as long as possible instead. ;)
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next