Comments

• 

  Drekx Omega May 17, 2025 at 4:53pm

  Starmer chameleon....Hahahahahehehehehehehohohoho...!! Getta loada dis, first....🤣
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRVeR0rGPQI
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 17, 2025 at 4:44pm

  

  Dreks,
  It is good that you understand that 'zero point energy' is just 'aetheric energy'. Physicists tried so much to do away with aether only to hit at zero point energy. But 'empty space' cannot have any energy, even according to their E=mc^2. In fact they don't understand why this zero point energy (hence mass) cannot warp the entire space-time into a dot.
  
  As for Pralaya technologies, I would like to know more about it. If you can link to me some articles, it would be nice. When I Google search, I only find Indian hypersonic missiles labeled 'pralaya missiles' lol!
• 

  Drekx Omega May 17, 2025 at 4:30pm

  

  In this video, neither Clayton Morris, nor Natalie, know the answers as to Kier Starmer's back tracking on his illegal migration policies...They both stated this several times, that they had no comprehension, as to what has changed Starmer....
  
  I'll spell it out here, for the record.....It's because Starmer was shocked by the recent local elections in England, which placed the Reform party in the dominant position, even in the Labour heartlands...(now former red wall heartlands..)
  Starmer has been back peddling furiously, ever since, as poll after poll is catapulting Nigel Farage's Reform party, into prime position with the people, offering a popular Reform party leadership and potential Farage premiership....
  
  So basically, Starmer fears the loss of power...and sees mimicry as his only option, now...
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdAIXFRSWHA
• 

  Drekx Omega May 17, 2025 at 4:14pm

  

  I don't mean aetheric energy, aka zero point, is incomprehensible to current science, as it's been discovered, rediscovered, then airbrushed, rediscovered again, suppressed, several times, over the past 100 years...I speak of the pralaya technologies, which are more complex...
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 17, 2025 at 3:13pm

  

  As for interstellar technology, there are reasons why we must create models that we can understand, even though some might actually use means that are 'beyond understanding'. Aside from the 'al buraq' case (it used to require a technology that is beyond understanding to merely get from Mecca to Jerusalem overnight!), The mere fact that a UFO will, at some point, have to decloak means that there is a one to one correspondence between the 'higher mind's theories and the 'lower mind's ones. It is something like antidesiter CFT correspondence. So if we can stick to what we can understand, we can keep beeing led to more and more discoveries, without being completely wrong, much like the way science, though may not be perfect, does progress while religion, which puports to be perfect already does not progress at all. Muslims could still be relying on Al buraq to whisk them to Mecca!
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 17, 2025 at 2:54pm

  

  I understand the limitations of language so well. If you were asked to describe the exact how to tie a neck tie using English language, you will easily run out of problem. But this of course doesn't mean that tieing a neck tie is 'beyond human understanding'. What has actually happened is that we haven't developed the language enough. To develop language well, we must communicate every experience and label all of them.
  
  You will find no much problem describing to me how some esoteric idea works if we had shared some experiences in esoteric world. You merely needs to tell me what you call various experiences in the esoteric world.
  
  Physicists encounters the same problem when they try to explain quantum mechanics, general relativity etc to 'leymen'. In fact they say that English language cannot describe quantum mechanics etc very well. They are some how correct. I don't know how many 'experiences' you will have to go through with some mathematician so you may understand what he means by 'Hilbert Space' or 'calabi yau manifold' etc. But the fact that a mathematician will find it difficult or even impossible to describe a 'calabi yau manifold' using English does not mean that it is 'beyond logical mind's or such things. In fact the concepts are very easy to understand, and you probably understand it already, only that the language is a problem.
  
  So this new age reasoning, that 'if you cannot describe it using English, then it is some idea 'beyond understanding', 'beyond logic' etc is fallacious! If we cannot describe using a language, then that is the problem of the language, not of the mind!
• 

  Drekx Omega May 17, 2025 at 2:19pm

  

  Most of the exotic and off world origin tech I have used and dealt with, is difficult to describe in the English language, as to the exact scientific functionality....We can sometimes revert to ancient sanskrit words only..words such as "pralaya...."... प्रलय
  
  Totally real science, but it requires a leap of faith, among conventional Earth scientists, as the principles may be totally new and undiscovered, to date, in regular circles...And thus, we hear their words in response; "that's impossible...!"
  
  However, it happens and I have had it explained to me, in my deep subconscious, which drips out the details, slowly, as it's so complex...Some comprehensions require the higher mind....I'm told by ascended beings, that science can be explored without limit, providing a level of consciousness has been attained, to comprehend and apply it..For power without love, is highly dangerous...and when I say love I mean more than sentiments upon the astral plane...I speak of the buddhic loving beingness, in which bliss simply is...After all, there is no need for competition, nor wealth, nor status, if one has it all in free abundance.....No need for ideologies, when all is known....and all lies become transparent...
  
  The concept of destroying matter, atoms and molecules....Science finds difficult...energy cannot be destroyed, only converted...etc....Splitting an atom, but never destroying one..?? Well, pralaya devices can achieve the impossible, it seems...
  Ground Crew simply use the Earth term for a disintegrator ray....One does not always need to know how something works, to know it does work...And even if a team of top Earth scientists attempted to discover how it works, they would flounder.....It truly requires comprehensions way above the consciousness, of most..
  
  However, at the pure spiritual levels, such as the monadic plane and above, it seems that nothing can destroy spirit.....only form expression is mortal, but spirit is the TRUE immortality....
  
  The cosmic aetheric comprises:
  
  1) Logoic
  2) Monadic
  3) Atmic
  4) Buddhic
  5) Manasic
  6) Astral
  7) Physical aetheric
• 

  AlternateEarth May 17, 2025 at 1:07pm

  RL -no kidding, I swear it- I saw a mouse pass through a baseboard -ghost mouse-I'm not making fun of you -it was amazing, it just passed through a solid object because, in my humble opinion, the matter the mouse's spirit was cloaked in was vibrating differently from 3rd density.
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 17, 2025 at 11:46am

  

  An imaginative physicist can explain a UFO that is penetrating the mountains by supposing that the UFO is made of weakly interacting particles, like those posited to explain 'dark matter'. On the other hand, an unimaginative 'sceptic' can dismiss such a UFO by saying 'it demands magics' or 'it must go beyond physicality' and I believe that physicality is all there is.
  
  Thus you see that concepts such as 'magics', 'physicality', 'materislism', though might they be used by proponents to attempt to convince people that 'some things exist' (widen minds), they actually more often leads to even more narrowing of minds!! A physicist who has no use of these concepts can easily arrive at the conclusion that an object can pass through a solid, while those who are tangled with concepts of 'physicality' etc gets hopelessly stucked!
  
  Then of course if a physicist who maintain that 'physicality' is all there is, offered an explanation of how a UFO can penetrate the mountains, it will be seen as just 'expansion of physicality', and yet were it a 'guru' who offered a similar explanation, it would have been seen as 'expansion of magical thinking' or 'a combination of logic and intuition' etc. You see how pointless these concepts can get?
  
  So to me, it is better to stop using these concepts as 'mind', 'logics', 'magics', 'physicality' etc. Just widen your imagination, and it's all!
• 

  Roaring Lovely May 17, 2025 at 11:27am

  

  But you must note that there is a misuse of the concept 'physicality' just as there is 'intuition' and 'logic' etc. Actually, he questions like:
  1.)Do you believe in life after death
  2.)Do you believe in ETs
  3.)Do you believe that there is God, spirit, angels etc
  4.)Do you believe that an alien spaceship can pass through a solid etc
  
  Really has nothing to do with whether or not one:
  
  1.) Believes that physicality is all there is
  2.) Believes that there is something beyond physicality
  3.) Thinks only using logical mind
  4.) Thinks only using intuitive mind
  5.)Thinks using both the logical and the intuitive mind.
  
  Both the skeptics and the 'gurus' have gotten hopelessly stucked in debating if there is 'something beyond physicality'
  or 'if we must think using logics or intuition' thinking that the answers to those former questions hings on them. It doesn't! One can believe in 'only physicality' (like a certain member in this site) but still believes in life after death, ETs etc. One (eg some physicist s) think completely like 'magicians' but still reject spirits, God, ETs etc. One can think only logicaly and conclude that a given object is an ET spaceship, while someone else can be led by their intuition to conclude otherwise! An atheist's intuition can tell him there is no God.
  
  In short, those 'physicality', 'materislism', 'intuition' etc concepts are less relevant than 'gurus' and sceptics would want us to believe!