Comments

• 

  AlternateEarth October 8, 2022 at 1:55pm

  The original Vlad founded Kiev and and used to run with the Vikings up and down rivers in the region and you can imagine what they did
• 

  AlternateEarth October 8, 2022 at 1:53pm

  

  不滅の魂 - 天使 -this layer of the dimensional onion has become too evil for innocent children-and everyone else
• 

  AlternateEarth October 8, 2022 at 1:48pm

  Kiev was the original capital of Russia-read some of the invasions and battles, including the invasion of the region by the Persians, slaughters of Ukranians by the Nazis and the Soviets in the 30's and 40's-they all hate each other-perfect place to start ww1 and now ww3
• 

  Roaring Lovely October 8, 2022 at 12:25pm

  I may also ask: what if back in early 1990s, Ukraine wanted to sucede from Russia, but Russia did not like it. Then we would have the same situation like we have it today, where Donetks is now 'in the shoes' of Ukraine. But then the question is, would NATO then support Russia against Ukraine in the name of 'international laws' against unilateral sucession? If yes, then moraly speaking, what difference does it makes if Russia (under one president) allowed Ukraine to sucede but another president decides to retract? This seems to be a scenario similar to US retracting from JCPOA under Trump, for which Biden tells Iran 'this is the nature of democracy'.
  
  Obviously international relations are yet to be based on consistent principles!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely October 8, 2022 at 12:13pm

  Now in Kosovo, NATO, together with 'international court', OKeid the idea of a unilateral secession of a state. This should be jarring, but they switched gears now the Ukraine regions wants to unilaterally sucede and join Russia. It seems that the so called 'international community' is unable to make a consistent rule pertaining to sucesion. Some countries such as U.S. wants 'rules' that they can use it and throw them whenever it suits them.
  
  So the rule against unilateral sucesion was never based on ethics at all, but the desire to not have 'too small' and hence 'too many' countries. Too many countries will be difficult to manipulate! All merely expedient rules donnot raise eyebrows when they are brocken. However, there is obvious ethical reason why unilateral sucesion should be illegal. A single country often share taxes in a way that should they break apart, one cannot tell what owe what and how much and where exactly should the boundaries be drawn. So unilateral secession should be illegal.
  
  Now come to Ukraine. The sucession of Ukraine off USSR was never unilateral, but it involved Russia. So there must have been expectations Russia had about an 'independent Ukraine' when it agreed that Ukraine should be independent. Otherwise Russia would not have agreed so, and then sucession of Ukraine would have been illegal. But now ethically speaking, what if Ukraine now retract from its ways and behaviours? Does Russia have a right to review its earlier decision to allow Ukrain to secede? I think the answer is a big YES, for otherwise the rule against unilateral sucession would not have any moral/ ethical basis. The point is that had Ukraine behaved the same way it behaves today,(ie adoption an unti-Russian attitude that leaves some regions pro-Russia hence dividing the country), albeit back in early 1990s, Russia would not have allowed Ukraine to succeed, or at least it would have disputed the boundaries (so that the pro-Russian regions remain in Russia). Thus one can, in a logically sound way, Turn the argument that Donesk etc has no right to unilateraly sucede from Ukraine, on Ukraine and NATO's own head!
  
  To put it in summary, the fact Ukraine was recently part of Russia means that the two still has some rights to claim/dispute their territories, as part of the very rule against sucession now NATO etc try to apply it in Donesk etc!
• 

  Roaring Lovely October 8, 2022 at 10:45am

  Quote:
  More silly politics 🥳
  
  https://i.ibb.co/Pcym10Z/B2-D5-A544-7-D5-C-409-E-962-C-652-D17-DDCE...
  
  Reply:
  One big problem with us human beings is that we begine by first choosing the side we like. After that, we begine thinking. We do so such that we are critical to whatever fact, evidence or argument that favours the side we have choosen against. We do so in all fields, from religion to science to maths to politics etc. Every human being is prone to this problem, from experts to Lehmen. If you think that you are not prone to it, then you are deceiving yourself!
  
  But what does it drive us to choose sides first? Unfortunately, in most cases, it is never facts, nor logic nor sense. It is often emotionally charging scenarios. You might like Elon musk as a person, Zelensky, Putin or whatever. You might have developed prejudice against Russia, US or NATO. So you have already 'choosen your side'. It is just like in a football match or such things. You choose Arsenal before they win the tournament, or even a match. Henceforth you will be talking about how 'good' arsenal is, despite losing the match. You ignore or belittle all 'facts' that are contrary to the side you have chosen.
  
  Skilled politicians are aware of this human limitation very well. So they often try to make sure that they lead their followers to first choose a side before they can reason about that side or the other side. Thus an issue of contest must never first be what exactly Elon Musk etc said. You must first choose what type of 'Elon Musk' you prefer. You must first choose between Russia and Ukraine before you think and judge the situation. The end result is almost always, a misjudgement!
• 

  Drekx Omega October 8, 2022 at 9:37am

  

  After the midterm elections, both the House and Senate should be full of Trump endorsed politicians and that will be a better time for any actual "UAP" disclosures to the political class...
  
  It's actually rather enjoyable to know, that some of we starseeds, know much, much more, about so called "UAP/USO/UFOs," than they do......I think some of these clowns are more concerned about the "science" definition being "correct," than anything useful, like the cultures and civilisations that manufacture and send them....(Most are based at the GFL Command base, within the Earth.)
  
  The less corrupt DNC & Rhino politicians know, the better......BUT, if they are well meaning patriots and champions of the people, then we're happy that they receive the briefing and without further secrecy...Open the subject up, more....We need the cabal out of the way first, though....as well as their crazy MSM...
  😇🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸
  
  https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/videos/drekx-omega-location-of-ea...

  

  Drekx Omega ~ Location of Earths Galactic Federation of Light Command Base

  http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/the-location-of-earth-s-gfl-command-base
• 

  Andromedaner Z October 7, 2022 at 9:04pm

  

  yes, silly politics, like the Nobel Peace Prize Committee today! LOL
• 

  Andromedaner Z October 7, 2022 at 8:58pm

  I have the feeling there will come much more from the UFO subject in the near future, but not for the betterment of humanity
• 

  Andromedaner Z October 7, 2022 at 8:36pm

  

  I just learned, the push in the US congress for UFO "disclosure" is just an updated cover-up.
  The US congress will interview insiders and they will get immunity if they signed a NDA on that matter, but we the people will not be updated on the data.
  And now worldwide UFO researchers don't want the USA to dominate the narrative on UFOs!