Ashtar Command Crew - The Awakening Movement

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Comments are closed.

Comments

  • 不滅の魂 - 天使 -this layer of the dimensional onion has become too evil for innocent children-and everyone else
  • Kiev was the original capital of Russia-read some of the invasions and battles, including the invasion of the region by the Persians, slaughters of Ukranians by the Nazis and the Soviets in the 30's and 40's-they all hate each other-perfect place to start ww1 and now ww3
  • Zelensky is not a skilled politician. That is easy to observe. And I doubt if he is a skilled actor.

    I hope that Elon Musk had a good laugh about Zelensky’s tweet 😄

    This is what politics looks like 🎪

    https://i.ibb.co/Pcym10Z/B2-D5-A544-7-D5-C-409-E-962-C-652-D17-DDCE...
  • I may also ask: what if back in early 1990s, Ukraine wanted to sucede from Russia, but Russia did not like it. Then we would have the same situation like we have it today, where Donetks is now 'in the shoes' of Ukraine. But then the question is, would NATO then support Russia against Ukraine in the name of 'international laws' against unilateral sucession? If yes, then moraly speaking, what difference does it makes if Russia (under one president) allowed Ukraine to sucede but another president decides to retract? This seems to be a scenario similar to US retracting from JCPOA under Trump, for which Biden tells Iran 'this is the nature of democracy'.

    Obviously international relations are yet to be based on consistent principles!!
  • Now in Kosovo, NATO, together with 'international court', OKeid the idea of a unilateral secession of a state. This should be jarring, but they switched gears now the Ukraine regions wants to unilaterally sucede and join Russia. It seems that the so called 'international community' is unable to make a consistent rule pertaining to sucesion. Some countries such as U.S. wants 'rules' that they can use it and throw them whenever it suits them.

    So the rule against unilateral sucesion was never based on ethics at all, but the desire to not have 'too small' and hence 'too many' countries. Too many countries will be difficult to manipulate! All merely expedient rules donnot raise eyebrows when they are brocken. However, there is obvious ethical reason why unilateral sucesion should be illegal. A single country often share taxes in a way that should they break apart, one cannot tell what owe what and how much and where exactly should the boundaries be drawn. So unilateral secession should be illegal.

    Now come to Ukraine. The sucession of Ukraine off USSR was never unilateral, but it involved Russia. So there must have been expectations Russia had about an 'independent Ukraine' when it agreed that Ukraine should be independent. Otherwise Russia would not have agreed so, and then sucession of Ukraine would have been illegal. But now ethically speaking, what if Ukraine now retract from its ways and behaviours? Does Russia have a right to review its earlier decision to allow Ukrain to secede? I think the answer is a big YES, for otherwise the rule against unilateral sucession would not have any moral/ ethical basis. The point is that had Ukraine behaved the same way it behaves today,(ie adoption an unti-Russian attitude that leaves some regions pro-Russia hence dividing the country), albeit back in early 1990s, Russia would not have allowed Ukraine to succeed, or at least it would have disputed the boundaries (so that the pro-Russian regions remain in Russia). Thus one can, in a logically sound way, Turn the argument that Donesk etc has no right to unilateraly sucede from Ukraine, on Ukraine and NATO's own head!

    To put it in summary, the fact Ukraine was recently part of Russia means that the two still has some rights to claim/dispute their territories, as part of the very rule against sucession now NATO etc try to apply it in Donesk etc!
  • Quote:
    More silly politics 🥳

    https://i.ibb.co/Pcym10Z/B2-D5-A544-7-D5-C-409-E-962-C-652-D17-DDCE...

    Reply:
    One big problem with us human beings is that we begine by first choosing the side we like. After that, we begine thinking. We do so such that we are critical to whatever fact, evidence or argument that favours the side we have choosen against. We do so in all fields, from religion to science to maths to politics etc. Every human being is prone to this problem, from experts to Lehmen. If you think that you are not prone to it, then you are deceiving yourself!

    But what does it drive us to choose sides first? Unfortunately, in most cases, it is never facts, nor logic nor sense. It is often emotionally charging scenarios. You might like Elon musk as a person, Zelensky, Putin or whatever. You might have developed prejudice against Russia, US or NATO. So you have already 'choosen your side'. It is just like in a football match or such things. You choose Arsenal before they win the tournament, or even a match. Henceforth you will be talking about how 'good' arsenal is, despite losing the match. You ignore or belittle all 'facts' that are contrary to the side you have chosen.

    Skilled politicians are aware of this human limitation very well. So they often try to make sure that they lead their followers to first choose a side before they can reason about that side or the other side. Thus an issue of contest must never first be what exactly Elon Musk etc said. You must first choose what type of 'Elon Musk' you prefer. You must first choose between Russia and Ukraine before you think and judge the situation. The end result is almost always, a misjudgement!
  • After the midterm elections, both the House and Senate should be full of Trump endorsed politicians and that will be a better time for any actual "UAP" disclosures to the political class...

    It's actually rather enjoyable to know, that some of we starseeds, know much, much more, about so called "UAP/USO/UFOs," than they do......I think some of these clowns are more concerned about the "science" definition being "correct," than anything useful, like the cultures and civilisations that manufacture and send them....(Most are based at the GFL Command base, within the Earth.)

    The less corrupt DNC & Rhino politicians know, the better......BUT, if they are well meaning patriots and champions of the people, then we're happy that they receive the briefing and without further secrecy...Open the subject up, more....We need the cabal out of the way first, though....as well as their crazy MSM...
    😇🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸

    https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/videos/drekx-omega-location-of-ea...
    Drekx Omega ~ Location of Earths Galactic Federation of Light Command Base
    http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/the-location-of-earth-s-gfl-command-base
  • Be sure. Not everyone believes what the so-called politics says about the so-called U.F.O's. You still got incaned Frinds here on Shan (Earth).
  • yes, silly politics, like the Nobel Peace Prize Committee today! LOL
  • I have the feeling there will come much more from the UFO subject in the near future, but not for the betterment of humanity
This reply was deleted.

General Relativistic Aether Theory


Before Einstein developed Special Relativity, Hendrick Lorentz had developed the so called 'Lorentz Aether Theory' to explain the same thing. As far as physics is concerned, Einstein added (or in fact 'removed'), very little from Lorentz's…

Read more…
Views: 24
Comments: 4

Latest Activity

Roaring Lovely commented on Roaring Lovely's blog post General Relativistic Aether Theory
"I think we need a new theory of gravity to explain this dazzling cosmic web. Preferably, gravity not as a 'monopoler', but di-poler or even tri-poler etc. Preferably, this theory should do away with any need for 'dark matter'…"
28 minutes ago
LordAshtar updated their profile
34 minutes ago
Sirian Starlight commented on Roaring Lovely's blog post General Relativistic Aether Theory
"As a side note, everyone is talking about whether gravity is a force on its own, or not. Gravity is a wave, that is generated when an object is moving at a fixed rate in space. The greater the depth an object has, the more weight it has, equals the…"
2 hours ago
Sirian Starlight commented on Roaring Lovely's blog post General Relativistic Aether Theory
"I can tell you, that this theory alternative is, incomplete.
A view point yet to consider, is one known as "nothing is relative" concept. Two objects of the exact same material form, can exist on top of each other without causing any ill lasting…"
2 hours ago
America child of the Law of One shared a profile on Facebook
2 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
5 hours ago
Libra Rose, Gracie, africasounds and 3 more joined Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community
5 hours ago
Drekx Omega replied to Krishna Kalki's discussion ET Expert Claims Buried “Ancient Space Ark” in Ukraine Has Been Excavated and Activated…HIGHLY RECOMMEND
"The sheer volume of wild stories coming out of Ukraine, at present, is off the charts..."Ascension & Awakening" is your supposed category, but maybe find another one named; "Tomfoolery."
And why is this mythical craft an "ark...?" And have you ever…"
8 hours ago
More…