Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely September 24, 2022 at 7:53am

  I need to clarify a bit on this issue of 'ethics surrounding slave trade abolition'. Very few pple, including so called 'blacks', can discern the lie that 'white man abolished slavery' willingly. We know very well, in modern times, that 'influx of pple' to Britain is not politically tenable, hence Brexit etc. This mean Britons, even in modern times, donnot want people going to Britain to work for cheap wages, even if picking vegetables, cleaning toilets, driving trucks etc, not because they don't like exploitation of these cheap labour but because there are Britons who can do this tasks for better wages!! The same thing will be even worse if it were an 'immigration' due to 'slave trade'.
  
  People take it for granted, without thinking, that an influx of 'black' slaves to America or Europe will be of benefit to a 'white man' and so the latter man has not other motive behind termination of such, other than having higher moral values. This view falls down on close extermination that the capitalism which was an hold over from feudalism rendered land owners and factory owners few (perhaps even 1%) and the rest of 'white men' must seek employment from the capitalist. So influx of slaves would either leave a 'white man' with no job or be forced to be a slave too! Furthermore, the continued influx of slaves would irrevesably change the demographics of America etc, making it a 'black-majority' country! So slave trade had to be stopped for the sake of 'white man' and his future, not the other way round!
• 

  Roaring Lovely September 24, 2022 at 7:13am

  

  They now insinuate that they cared less about 80% of Yemenis stranded with no food, or killing of over 10000 of their children because unlike Ukrainians, they are not civilized blue-eyed blondes. They (those who engage in so called wokery) are not even ashamed to say this loudly in their MSM! There is nothing benevolent at all about wokery! BLM, for instance, has nothing to do with support for the so called 'blacks'. Same applies to 'end of slavery', 'decolonization' etc. Every smart person knows that these persuits backfired against the cabal, and so were abolished, for otherwise 'immigration' of so called blacks would be welcomed.
  
  Anybody can be 'black' or 'white' depending on where they live on earth. A Palestinian in U.S. is a 'black' person, and so 'his life matter' there, but holus bolus, in Israel, he is a 'white man', and the so called 'left' person now don't care about the lifes of the Palestinian!!
  
  The modern world like to dwell on an allegedly evil past, eg slavery, colonialism etc as if we are living in a different moral standard in modern times. We are not!
• 

  Roaring Lovely September 24, 2022 at 6:50am

  

  Quote:
  
  "Moreover, we abolished slavery in 1833, three decades before America..And policed the high seas, fighting the slave trade of other colonial powers, including America, France, Holland, Spain and Portugal...As well as middle eastern and African slavers.."
  
  Quote:
  
  More accurately:
  "Moreover, we abolished slavery in 1833, three decades before America..And (USED THIS AS AN EXCUSE TO) police the high seas, fighting the slave trade of other colonial powers, including America, France, Holland, Spain and Portugal...As well as middle eastern and African slavers.."
  
  In other words Britain attempted to asurp the 'world policeman' role in the guise of 'fighting slave trade' just like U.S. attempts to do so in the guise of 'fighting terrorism' or 'spreading democracy'. This is why we condemn Britain.
  
  U.S.(often in company of Britain) uses 'fight for communism', 'fight of terrorism' and 'spread of democracy' to justify every kind of wickedness around the world. Why did they help to install Mobutu or even Saddam? Guess what? this was 'necessary evil' to fight communism! Why create al-Qaida? again 'to fight communism'. Why help Israel for apartheid against Palestinians? 'to fight Hamas', which 'is a terorist group'.
  
  You might have also noticed that everyone who does not serve U.S.'s interests is either a 'terrorist', an 'authoritarian', a 'communist', a 'state sponsor of terrorism' or 'in the communist sphere of influence'. Thus houthis are 'terrorists'. Talibanis are 'terrorists', mau mau (at then) were 'terrorists' IRGC are 'terrorists'. Russia is 'a state sponsor of terrorism'. Phew!
  
  Thus I don't need lots of past, possibly corrupted his-story to question the sudden benevolence in British alleged 'policing the world' to end 'slave trade'. We know how governments works, as seen in modern world. We don't need history at all! His-story only creats room for more lies and more propaganda. If we cannot agree on what is going on NOW in Ukraine, what can we agree about in 1800s?
• 

  Drekx Omega September 23, 2022 at 8:41pm

  

  For all my dear friends on ACC, here is a welcome musical interlude, in between our passionate and lively discussions, upon the salient topics of history, space farers, occult and politics......
  
  Note the excellent organist skills of Elske and I especially enjoy the forceful majesty of the fugue....Something of a musical force majeure....👏🏻😊🎵
  
  Bach - Prelude and fugue in B minor BWV 544 - Te Lindert of the Netherlands Bach Society
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES7fN2lXWHU
• 

  Drekx Omega September 23, 2022 at 6:28pm

  

  I'm very pleased to see that many outlets on the right, in America, are noticing the absurdities of globalist/communist wokesters, in MSM, demanding that the "British Empire" pays reparations to black people, for colonialism and slavery.....
  
  The ignorant left do not realise that the UK is a Constitutional Monarchy, not an Absolute Monarchy...and there is a difference, when it comes to national budgeting and control of the exchequer...
  
  Moreover, we abolished slavery in 1833, three decades before America..And policed the high seas, fighting the slave trade of other colonial powers, including America, France, Holland, Spain and Portugal...As well as middle eastern and African slavers..
  
  Don lemon, of CNN, made a complete ass of himself recently, when he suggested this anti-British talking point, in an interview with an informed royal scholar, WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS HISTORY......lol😇 Something these woke people are not used to ...
  
  "McEnany: This takedown of Don Lemon was 'absolutely epic'"
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz5I_A5bQTk
• 

  Andromedaner Z September 23, 2022 at 1:59pm

  

  Hello Ivy who is this guy? he managed to scare off the whole Dutch government, BRAVO
  https://twitter.com/sophiadahl1/status/1572989756207779841

  https://twitter.com/sophiadahl1/status/1572989756207779841
• 

  AlternateEarth September 23, 2022 at 12:47pm

  https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-22-zelensky-deletes-photo-bodyg...

  Zelensky quietly deletes photo of his bodyguard’s pro-Hitler patch – NaturalNews.com
• 

  AlternateEarth September 23, 2022 at 12:42pm

  https://www.infowars.com/posts/sandy-hook-lawyer-attempts-to-force-...

  

  Sandy Hook Lawyer Attempts To Force Alex Jones To Undergo Communist Struggle Session

  Weaponized judicial system being used to eviscerate First Amendment and shut down Infowars, but Alex Jones won't go down without a fight!
• 

  Roaring Lovely September 23, 2022 at 9:45am

  The most reasonable explanation as to why Russia advanced to Kiev from Belarus is as 'diversion tactic'. It forced Ukraine to stop its shelling in Donbass and concentrate on defending the more strategic cities such as Kiev. It is like putting the king in a 'check' in a chess game, so that the next move of the opponent will be to move the king off the check position thereby failing to rescue a rook at the corner!😆
  
  So I don't just 'follow propaganda'. I listen to all sides and draw a view that can rationally explain the situation.
  
  Also that Russia's mission is a 'special military operation' is not a 'media propaganda'. That is the gazetted order from Russia's commander in chief of armed forces. That is what armies are officially ordered to do, and they know what operation is 'invasion', 'annexation' 'demilitarization' etc. Putin's statement was formal, not a media briefing, or something like that.
• 

  Roaring Lovely September 23, 2022 at 9:26am

  

  Haha! That's funny, but yes, I will respond with some knowledge.
  
  JJ buys into the western propaganda claiming that Putin's aim is to annex the whole of Ukraine. He falls into it due to the carefull crafting that takes the advantage of the fact that originally, Russia invade from the north all the way through Chernobyl as if in an attempt to stage a quick coup in Kiev.
  
  But this näive comparison with U.S. invasion of Iraq that marched from the Gulf of Persia all the way to Baghdad fails to take a crucial fact into consideration: The coalition forces had to use about 200,000 troops to overthrow the tiny Iraq but Putin only sent around 50,000 troops to Kiev from Belarus.
  
  Now who is here buying into propaganda without thinking? Someone who beleives that a country of over 40 million pple can be annexed by just 50,000 gunmen or someone who reasons that a complete annexation of Ukraine could not have been the true aim of Russia? The crowd can decide this for themselves!