Comments

• 

  judithfaye66 January 18, 2022 at 7:36pm

  Is it ok to hold a clergyman and his congregants hostage just because he feels like it and wants to speak to his sister who was convicted of terrible crimes?
• 

  judithfaye66 January 18, 2022 at 7:33pm

  Kudos to the MIT Educated Dr. :)
• 

  AlternateEarth January 18, 2022 at 1:39pm

  https://www.infowars.com/posts/mit-educated-doctor-ordered-to-under...

  

  MIT-Educated Doctor Ordered to Undergo Psych Evaluation After Prescribing Ivermectin

  Medical license suspended for posting COVID "misinformation."
• 

  Roaring Lovely January 18, 2022 at 7:07am

  

  ' As for whether Taliban is extremist or not, that is not the issue I am basically interested with. The point is that whatever entity Taliban is, it is supported by the pple of Afghanistan, at leats, when foreigners go there to fight! (Perhaps because as bad as one of them maybe, he is still someone's brother, dad, cousin, clan member or a member of ethnic group.).
  
  What I am saying is that it is the people of Afghanistan, and perharps to some extent Iran, Pakistan and other adjuscent countries who should be left to decide whether or not they want a secular state, a theocracy, a sharia law in Afghanistan. If others such as Germans etc donnot like Islamic Theocracy, they should migrate and leave in their good country in Germany rather than waiting to be 'persecuted' there and then cry for 'the world to take war to Afghanistan'. Also what I am saying is that beware of US and other Talibani enemies propaganda when reading things or watching media. They may exaggerate or give only half the story. That is all what I am saying. I am not saying 'Talibanis are good'.I don't think any group of fighters anywhere, including state armies are 'good'!
  
  Contrary to what US seems to believe, democracy is not just 'an opportunity to vote'. Pple are not voting machines. Faith in institutions is absolutely necessary for democracy. Institutions created by foreigners, including fighting groups, can never be trusted to oversee elections. We see now in US the 'democracy' means little because they have lost faith in their institutions. This means US should be doing something about its own democracy. It is not yet time to attempt to 'democratize' other countries! It should be first trying to creat trust in its own institutions!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely January 18, 2022 at 6:01am

  

  Ancient books should be interpreted like we should, the constitution: in such a way that it is faith full to the intentions of those who wrote it. It should not be 'linguistic' or 'accademic'. For instance, when inteprating 'freedom of media', we must understand that the writers of say the US constitution did not foresee a future where there is such an advanced technology as satellites and internet. The media messages was transmitted on horse backs, so almost anyone could create his own 'media'. 'Freedom of media' empowerment ordinary people, not tycoons! 'Freedom of media' was 'freedom to aquire true information'. It was certainly not 'freedom to be cheated with a tsunami of fake news and propaganda' from the elites and cabals!
• 

  Roaring Lovely January 18, 2022 at 5:49am

  We more or less cut and past a verse like this:
  
  "9:123
  ﭑ ‎ ﭒ ‎ ﭓ ‎ ﭔ ‎ ﭕ ‎ ﭖ ‎ ﭗ ‎ ﭘ ‎ ﭙ ‎ ﭚ ‎ ﭛ ‎ ﭜ ‎ ﭝ ‎ ﭞ ‎ ﭟ ‎ ﭠ ‎ ﭡ ‎ ﭢ‎
  O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you, and let them find severity in you. Know well that Allah is with the God-fearing"
  
  It is such verses in Quran that extremists, like ISIS etc uses. But they are refusing to understand Quran as, at best, a 'word of God' framed my a human in such a way as a human can understand. (of course for non Muslim, at worst it is just a human concoction). If God wished, he could talk to us directly face to face now, and tell us if anything, what he wants us to do. We don't need to read 6000 years old books to learn about a being supposedly here with us now!
  
  During the times when Quran was written, religions in Arabia was at constant hostility towards each other, and especially towards new religions. It was a worse form of what was taking place in Palestine etc. Consider Jesus surrounded by Pharisees, Saducees and all these other 'Jews' almost every time Jesus says anything contrary to Judaism, they pick up stones to stone him! It was this way in Arabia, but much worse! Even in Palestine, during Jesus's time, the 'non-beleiver' of Jesus almost meant 'the one against Jesus'. (Hence Jesus said 'he who is not with me is against me) It doesn't mean the same thing it means today! It was much worse in Arabia.
  
  So Muhammad was trying to tell his followers that Islam is not a pacifist religion. That the 'non-believers' are out to fight them to try to exterminate Islam, like they did to Christians was obvious and 'Muhammad' needed not to write it, nor could he foresee the distant future, which is our time of religious tolerance.
• 

  Roaring Lovely January 18, 2022 at 5:04am

  "Islam claims that moslems can do whatever they want to non moslems, icluding enslaving them and poisoning with herior or whatever-perfect henchman for the globalists."
  
  Please quote the Quran to substantiate this point.
• 

  AlternateEarth January 17, 2022 at 11:41pm

  Obama admin and the US/Allied intel agencies helped the taliban and skimmed profits.
  The taliban is an islamic org. Islam claims that moslems can do whatever they want to non moslems, icluding enslaving them and poisoning with herior or whatever-perfect henchman for the globalists.
  This dimension B is a piece of shite on steroids -owned and operated by DEMONS using flesh bag scum as puppets
• 

  marker dragon January 17, 2022 at 6:11pm

  The USA government is not the USA. It is the globalists. Yes, theywant to rape and enslave every country including Afghanistan. The USA fake government is the enemy. Is the 4th reich of nazis
• 

  Roaring Lovely January 17, 2022 at 4:28pm

  

  Why do you think farming heroin different from tobacco? Anyway it is US's fault that Taliban ended up entertaining heroine trade. US, of course, uses its economic advantage (doller as a reserve currency) against you in war forcing you to illicit trade. The war itself is illegal anyway!!
  
  Now same applies to the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps. US gave sanctions to Iran thinking that they will make IRGC poorer. But it made it richer since actually it gets most of its money not through legal trade (where US can easily block), but through smugglings and such. Sanctions to Iran only makes smuggling popular amongst the Irani masses, damage the civilian economy while not preventing steady revenue to the military, making things worse off! Same is the case to Afghanistan heroine trade! Farmers, of course, are ready for better crop, but the US economic rule book stiffles things. Again the whole blame goes to US. It weaponizes dollar and trade, and that is the problem. It should leave trade as trade and wars as wars! Why? Because the fighters will get the money anyway, through illicit trade. So the weaponization of dollar only promote illicit trade without stopping fighters from getting the money!!