Comment Wall
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Your Relationship With Fear By Natalie Glasson With Archangel Raphael
Your Relationship With Fear By Natalie Glasson With Archangel Raphael Greetings, greetings, greetings I share with you. I am Archangel Raphael. I come forth with the angelic vibration and bring forth the archangels to surround you with their…
Read more…Contemplations Of Love
Contemplations Of Love Love is the internal dance that illuminates this human consciousness, in internal knowledge, in internal understanding, in the supreme magic of each one of our senses. Blessed be the divine breath of God, cosmic universe…
Read more…Embracing Divine Freedom & Enlightenment By Emmanuel Dagher
Embracing Divine Freedom & Enlightenment By Emmanuel Dagher The old, deeply rooted survival patterns that we have been identifying with for so long have been coming to the surface in recent weeks. Have you noticed? This is happening because we…
Read more…❤Choose Love. Stand In Love. Be Love! By Melanie Beckler❤
❤Choose Love. Stand In Love. Be Love! By Melanie Beckler❤ Blessings and welcome to a new week! This is a powerful week for shifting energy… We’re still well within the energy of the powerful Solstice Gateway... when the light of the Sun activated…
Read more…You Are The Heart Of God
You are guided through our intimate communion and expanded in our unity of endless life. Most of all, you are the heart of God, awake, alive and present, standing on the crossroads for humanity and being the beacon of freedom. As the Moment of…
Read more…Latest Activity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhQB6xO00K8"
update: it works only with an UK bank acc ;)"
https://www.tallymoney.com/"
Comments
Note that magnetism, being dipoler, have easy time forming rope-like structures. But if you put together a huge number of magnets, without an external field, it will form a sphericaly symmetrical lumb. This is because the magnets are free to re-orient themselves. So even though there is a repulsive magnetic force, this repulsive force is easily hidden since rather than getting repelled, the magnet turns around and gets attracted.
So you see that a magnet can explain both sphericaly symmetrical lumbs and the asymmetrical ones! If we are inside a galaxy, then we have matter pulling in all directions. Our 'magnets' then are oriented in all directions, and thus our 'gravity' looks sphericaly symmetrical. But this situation may not exists between two galaxies. If there are two galaxies near each other, and others are are far further, then the 'magnets' will orient towards both the galaxies, easily forming long structures just in the same way iron fillings form the structures around a magnet.
It is not immediately apparent that the mainstream theories has a problem in explaining galaxy filaments. So let me elaborate it abit. The mainstream's gravity is fundamentally, what I may call it 'mono-poler'. This means that there is no repulsive force associated with gravity. Wallace's Theory, on the other hand is fundamentally 'di-poler'. The gravity's monopoler property emerges when large number of particles gravitates.
Now, in an entirely mono-poler force, we espect stars and galaxies to lump together into sphericaly symmetrical lumps, rather than form filaments. This is because each star pulls the other stars equally in all directions.
In fact such is how they explain why planets are spherical. If planets where cylindrical, it would be an headache to explain how they form using only gravity. A cylinder implies that either the plannet was consistently pulling matter only from the 'top' (so that the matter piles along one ditection into a long structure) or the planet pulled more strongly from the sides than it from 'top' and 'bottom' (so that it gets squeezed only along one direction-think of how you might kneed to form a spaghetti). In whichever way, this would show that gravity is not pulling evenly in all directions, as the theory insists.
But now since large scale structures don't form spheres, we must reconsider theories of gravity. We must make them capable of antisymmetric pulling in larger scale but symmetrical in smaller scales. Wallace's Theory does this excellently!
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-682110fd60c79dbdaeb4a966cff17...
c^2=1/εμ , according to Maxwell's theory. So in a realm where Wallace's gravity is smaller, light travels faster, for instance.
Even close to a powerful gravitational field, such as the sun's, a ship can remain "afloat," rather than subject to overwhelming pull forces...causing disintegration...Moreover, massive heat and solar winds, irradiating ships, can be shielded from, within protective electro-gravitic envelopes...Along with other force fields generated...
Another process which enables closer solar work, is vectoring inter-dimensionally...The higher the planes, (the faster LIGHT,) the easier to avoid space debris bumps, flare bursts, magnetic pulse, gravity distortions and hull scorching, from suns...The shields can almost be dropped completely, on the 4th aether....A far more gentle voyage in space, there.
Normally such Scout Ships, as you know, are either vectoring between a Mothership and planetary system...Or being cradled within the hangar bay of a Mothership...When cradled, they are within a general bay field that lightens them, to a mere quarter Ton each...
The gravity in a Mothership, is roughly equal to Earth's, at the equator...(Gravity is variable, across a planet and heaviest at the poles.) This applies on the bridge, engineering and recreation areas....Floating about weightlessly, is allowed for certain specialist tasks, in certain areas, for certain types of work.. This is not the norm,.
From experience, it has become normal practice to maintain a gravity field in the hanger bay, which allows the robot carriers of loads, some traction...Lest they bounce about like ping pong balls, uselessly....lol
And loads lose items, as they float about in the bay...Thus this policy applies as a rule, for all on the ship's manifest, including service robots..
It can work if we regard 'G' (appearing in both Newt's law and GR )as a variable, as many pple have suspected. In this case, we may say 'G has different value inside the field'.
mg=MmG/r^2
But inertial mass is also relevant.