DIDACTIC OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE
To justify or condemn is not to understand. Those who wish to overcome their flaws must neither justify nor condemn them. It is urgent to UNDERSTAND our…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
DIDACTIC OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE
To justify or condemn is not to understand. Those who wish to overcome their flaws must neither justify nor condemn them. It is urgent to UNDERSTAND our…
The Secret to Awakening! - Mooji What should we practice in order to awaken? What training leads to enlightenment? In this powerful teaching, Mooji reveals a truth that may surprise many seekers — awakening is not about complicated practices,…
Read more…Reiki for Anxiety: For the Soul Who Is Tired of Bracing A full Reiki healing transmission for anxiety and nervous system relief — clearing survival programming from the root and solar plexus and anchoring the living codes of safety, sufficiency, and…
Read more…Consciousness Upgrade Initiation - Week 1 - Solara An-Ra Please practice this for 7 days to receive the full initiation, before going onto the 2nd meditation. Dedicate these 3 weeks to you empowerment, expansion and original Blueprint…
Read more…Reiki Healing with Crystals for Clarity and Wisdom HI! I'm Danielle Stimpson of Learn Reiki Philadelphia. Whether you feel foggy about the facts, need help plotting your path forward or want to be open to more spiritual guidance in decision…
Read more…Claiming Oneness By Celestial White Beings Through Natalie Glasson Greetings, greetings, we are the Celestial White Beings. We come forth with our love and cosmic vibrations as many beings of white light, and yet we are one soul group, one source,…
Read more…One With The Infinite By Ann Albers & The Angels Hi All,Today, the angels take us on a little energetic journey of remembrance to help us connect with our true nature. Poetic, and peaceful, their message may help you resonate into a space of…
Read more…
Comments
Therefore the simplistic QM taught in introductory courses must be rejected when 'you grow up quantum-logically'.☺
That understanding must always include 'Quantum Decoherence'. Any article that talks about quantum measurement without a mention of Quantum Decoherence is an ignorant article, you can savely reject it, if you want to seriously understand QM!
The earlier QM theories of Heisenberg et-al did not contain quantum decoherence because they were theories of single particles. Measurement(hence observation), however must involve many, interacting particles as a measuring device must be a classic object as a human eye can only see a classic object.
When a quantum wave goes near the measuring device, this wave can nolonger be described by a single Schrodinger Equation. It now mixes with gazillions of waves. This Decoheres the wave and makes it like a particle, which joins the other particles forming the clasic object and completely joins the clasic system. So you see that the wave does 'collapse' into a particle-like wave-packet as it joins the classic object. The classic object is, itself, an ensemble of such wave-packets. Since the decohered wave-packet is now like any other classic object, we can savely regard the wave function as to have 'collapsed'.
You are welcome☺ It is so nice to hear that😆
I understand nothing of it! It sounds so complicated!"
Good!! Yes, QM is very complicated. I saw pple often post and talk about it here and I thought they were interested with it, and understanding it fairly well. I believe that what underpins it is relevant to UFOs, that is why I wanted to bring it here but first, after demystifying it off the 'tree-in-the-forest' reasoning. We must also first debunk the Copenhagen interpretation and show its inadequacy!
I have written several blogs that contains some lessons in QM. I have explained reiki, immortality etc using QM! They are there in my blog.☺
Why do anyone care about my character? I am not your wife, child, husband or whatever. I don't leave with you. So my character is not worth the space in this wall. I am not that important!!!
According to your beleifs, how do you think scientists observe an electron??
I have insinuated such questions an no one answers. Which is not a problem. If they did, I will respect their opinion! There is no beleif here shared with me, about QM, for me to respect!! I only get boring lectures!!! My character, not my opinion came on the table! And this is what I don't respect!! I don't respect lectures!! Maybe this is the source of confusion:
Lecture me even a bit, and I will treat you with contempt!!!
-
1684
-
1685
-
1686
-
1687
-
1688
of 1831 Next