Hello,
My name is Charlette s.
Timeline short history
2013 to 2020 old teaching of spiritual.
I am direct contact ashtar in person march 15, 2021 6am. Give me instructions for living, his arrival, judgment and…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Hello,
My name is Charlette s.
Timeline short history
2013 to 2020 old teaching of spiritual.
I am direct contact ashtar in person march 15, 2021 6am. Give me instructions for living, his arrival, judgment and…
Q: Master, regarding the stillness of the Mind and a quiet Mind, what can you tell us?
M.: Well, naturally, we must distinguish between a Mind that is still and a Mind that is quiet, between a Mind that is silent and a…
How To Start Feeling Qi In Your Body Master Mantak Chia is the Creator of the Healing Tao, Tao Yoga, Universal HEALING TAO System and the director of the Universal HEALING TAO Center and Tao Garden Health Spa & Resort in the beautiful northern…
Read more…🔥The Song Of The 7 Sisters🔥 The Pleiadians were among the primary seeders of the emotional body in humanity. Not the physical body (that came from other streams). Not the intellect (that came from yet others). The heart—the capacity to feel, to…
Read more…3-Step Heart Activation With Melanie Beckler Opening the heart chakra is essential on the spiritual path; it is a shift in how you relate to yourself and the world around you. When the heart is open, you move from a place of contraction and stress…
Read more…A Vision for Sheer Happiness All Day Today's Vision is a gem! It comes to you from Yezdi Thanevala in Mumbai, India. Thank You, Yezdi - and here is it! Imagine getting up in the morning one day and throughout the day, you get smiles from just…
Read more…
Comments
Nonsense! You insist that QM teaches claims like that when you see an empty table, money comes out of thin air!! (Tree-in-the-forest) Then when someone debunks this nonesense, you assingn them a lower '3d' status! Ergo, emperor's cloths fit perfectly about what you do!! Why try to put pple in 'lower' place for not beleiving in gibberish? I mean that is exactly what those who told the emperor 'they can see invisible cloths' were trying to do!! Assign sense to 'a lower position' to intimidate pple to applaud nonsense!!
You do champion a 'tree-in-the-forest' theory and claim it that this is what QM teaches. Then when you are shown otherwise, you switch gears and say 'QM is just 3D'. You do peddle 'emperor's cloths' over and over! You try to asing 'dimensionality' to arguments while never showing us what is it that you are calling it 'another world'. Not different from emperor's cloths that 'can only be seen by the privileged'!
These are your words, not mine. I have not said anything even remotely like this.
Generaly, it goes this way:
There is something that I know but which I can't explain to you. This knowledge makes me better off, in some way, than you.
In other words 'unlike you, I am privileged to see emperor's cloths'. It is a form of intimidation or peer preasure. We cant know or confirm if the claimant is actually seeing anything!!! But, he puts us down 'for not seeing it' anyway!! However, it turns out that there us nothing like that that actually exists, and so 'the emperor is naked'!
But they manage to intimidate pple to claim too that 'they see the cloths' by assigning those who 'don't see' to a 'lower state' eg '3d'!! So everyone claims 'they too are in 5d' to avoid being undertooked by the peers!!
Meanwhile, the concocters gets away with selling poppycock!!
Again. I do not live in your world. The work of 3d physics that you reference is primitive. Sorry."
It doesn't justify your belief that 'you create the world by merely looking at it', so again you resort to emperor's cloths!! If you don't see the cloths of the emperor, then 'you are primitive'. Hopefully , pple will claim that 'i too see the cloths' for fear that you will describe them as 'primitive'. But they will end up walking naked!! I am not one of them!!
Again. I do not live in your world. The work of 3d physics that you reference is primitive. Sorry.
Pure nonsense!! QM is a 3D theory! Must you hijack a physics theory, written with volumes of books to justify a simple, non-scientific, unfalsifiable claim about '5D'? Do you need a rubber stamp of a physicist to justify your beliefs?
-
1740
-
1741
-
1742
-
1743
-
1744
of 1881 Next