Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 4:03pm

  

  It can be true as a law that in a nuclear fussion, the energy inputted to it is always greater than the energy output. This also means that the sun is powered externally as is evidenced by the puzzling reverse temperature gradient of sun's corona.
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 3:49pm

  

  Cold fusion is the most interesting of all. I have also Google searched and found Thiago Olson, a teenager who made a laptop sized fusion reactor!!! So do you now believe me when I say smaller versions can be done???? I never knew of this when I said, I just reasoned.
  
  However, as usual, more energy was inputted than outputted! Isn't it reasonably for the physicists to have worked with this laptop sized, studying why it isn't producing enough, try to improve on it till it produce more energy than inputted before building giant ones? I mean if fusion, including possibly cold fusion, seems to consistently produce lesser energy than inputted, might this be so as a matter of some law of physics that they don't know of it yet? The problem is, this people are not doing SCIENCE. They are doing ENGINEERING!
  
  Think about this remembering that fusion energy was realy never observed, like in fision. It was THEORIZED, from the famous equation E=mc^2! It is quite possible that the 'mass loss' as we combine helium to hydrogen is realy never converted to energy at all!
• 

  AlternateEarth March 7, 2021 at 3:15pm

  Spritism(channeling) vs 3rd Dim(ensional) Phiosophy/Existensialism/Humanism Ect.
  https://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/spritism-channeling-...

  

  Spritism(channeling) vs 3rd Dim(ensional) Phiosophy/Existensialism/Humanism Ect.

  Spritism is not given much credence by todays' 'spiritual people' even though it involves channeling-there are books on becoming a medium through Spi…
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 2:22pm

  

  Also read the electric universe guys explain to you the problem with nuclear fussion research. The physicists over rely on mathematical models (magnetohydrodynamics ) rather than empirically observed properties of plasma. These mathematical models are said not to always agree with experiments. So the scientists working in fussion neaded experiments, not to engineer devices based on purely mathematical understanding of plasma! The experiments neaded to be done in smaller, laboratory plasma, and then watch how they scale up.
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 2:08pm

  

  Please also read 'internal Confinement Fusion' where they try to confine just 10 miligrams of plasma using lasers rather than magnetic field lines. So we can work with very tiny plasma to test the science first before we build giant, actual devices. The totamack guys, unlike the laser guys, made the blunder of building giant version before they tried smaller versions!
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 1:41pm

  

  If we are not trying to hold giant plasma, then we don't need giant magnetic field. We definitely can build smaller fashion because plasma physics scales down and scales up so well.
  
  To hold plasma the size of a tea spoonfull, do we need giant magnetic field? We don't! !
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 12:39pm

  

  The following are researches that I urge people to question:
  
  1.)CERN
  2.)LIGO
  3.)Human Genome Sequencing
  4. )Quantum Computer
  5.)Fussion Energy
  
  Probably these are mere pipelines to funnel public money! They are likely not based on legitimate science!
  
  Modern science is corrupt and after money, so be carefull!
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 12:24pm

  

  Please be sceptical about some of these extremely expensive 'science'. Remember, for instance, that while dozens of nations are coloborating to build a behemoth fusion device, they have never demonstrated a smaller, working fussion device capable of outputting more energy than its input!! Is that how all energy technologies were developed? Didn't Faraday, for instance, first built an hand-sized, cheap dynamo before giant ones were later built?
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 11:28am

  Also pilot-wave interpretation of quantum mechanics is the best one here, not the absurd Copenhagen. In pilot-wave, it is just that: pilot. It is a 'space ship' taking particles faster than light, piloted by a wavepacket. This theory has recently been demostrated in water with an oil drop!
• 

  Roaring Lovely March 7, 2021 at 11:16am

  

  I dont think it is a ship in ordinary sense of aircraft. I think it is a Gaussian bell enveloped soliton or wave-packet that pple see! Please google search these words:
  1.) Gaussian Bell
  2.)wave-packet
  3. ) soliton
  
  You will find that a wave-packet is a wave with an envelope of a Gaussian Bell. Then it now looks exactly like a UFO
  
  If the ET is trying to use quantum non locality to whisk up to here in picoseconds, then he needs a macroscopic wave-packet, i.e. what we call 'UFO'!.