Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 4:28pm

  Where is the place for laniakea or Hercules Borealis Great Wall in the universe where stars revolve around even bigger suns, the bigger suns revolves around even bigger suns, and so forth till they revolve around God?.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 4:03pm

  How about what is plausible?
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 3:04pm

  Ironically, these theories forbids interstellar communication! So if spacebrothers are talking to us, the answer is already glaring!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 12:16pm

  

  Actually my argument goes to the roots of the mathematical problem presented by the mathematical physicist termed Stephen Crothers. But I have added my own spin on it. I don't know why crothers seem not to have noted that the problem he is talking of reduces to this.
  
  Crothers argument against black hole theory is irrefutable!! Again I say it stems from negative numbers under squar roots. You can check it in the formular for gravitational time dilation see to it that beyond event horizon, we have a square root of a negative number!! If you accept that beyond the event horizon, an object can get there, despite the square root of the negative number, then you are saying that a ston that actually reached your head actually went up to moon just because mathematicaly we have a solution for such an height as a negative number under a square root!!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 12:09pm

  

  But if you cannot solve it, I can still guide you this way: If you throw a stone upwards, it traces something like a parabolic path. There is an height above which the stone cannot get. But in the maths of parabolas one can talk as though the stone can go up forever! Solving for such an height involves taking square root of a negative number (try that in your calculator).
  So whenever we see a negative number under a square root, we know that such a state, described by that math is not attainable. In the case of black hole, time dillation, leght contraction etc becomes negative numbers under square roots, for things supposedly beyond the event horizon. Therefore blackholes are unattainable!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 11:41am

  Can you solve the quadratic equation: x^2+x+1=0, and plot the graph y=x^2+x+1?? If you can, I will show you in a quick way why black hole theory is wrong maths.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:47pm

  'Material' is also problematic. Is light not 'matterial'? This word is ill-defined. I like to just say 'the seen world'. Then yes, the seen is the condition of the unseen
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:44pm

  I don't believe Black holes exist at all! As far as I can check, they are based on unsound mathematics!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:36pm

  

  The concept 'physical' is problematic. 'Energy', 'motion', 'vibration' etc are 'physical'. But when I say 'momentum', is it now 'physical'??
  
  Anyway, to say something is a law, it must not be possible to violate even a bit. To show that motion is not a law, all you need is stop a moving object. Same case to energy. Stop an object and its kinetic energy goes to the stars!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:21pm

  Those would not be laws but the CONDITION of the universe. There is a difference. If universe was static 'in the beginning', everything will be static now. There is no law that says things must move. Motion is a condition of nature, not a law. The only reason things move is that they had always been moving. The law here that is beeng obeyed is the law of conservation of momentum, not the 'law' that 'things must move'. Same reasoning applies to all those so called laws. Non of them is a law.