Comments

• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 5:34pm

  I have never heard of planet hoova, and I am not finding one online.
  
  I always thought God was like a sun, as well as like a lightning. That is with several glowing 'legs' that are like bikeland currents. I thought we are connected like the spokes of a bicycle. We are on the rim and God is in the axle and glowing a lot. This image brings euphoria to me.☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 4:30pm

  Btw I am a Laniakean.☺
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 4:28pm

  Where is the place for laniakea or Hercules Borealis Great Wall in the universe where stars revolve around even bigger suns, the bigger suns revolves around even bigger suns, and so forth till they revolve around God?.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 4:03pm

  How about what is plausible?
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 3:04pm

  Ironically, these theories forbids interstellar communication! So if spacebrothers are talking to us, the answer is already glaring!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 12:16pm

  

  Actually my argument goes to the roots of the mathematical problem presented by the mathematical physicist termed Stephen Crothers. But I have added my own spin on it. I don't know why crothers seem not to have noted that the problem he is talking of reduces to this.
  
  Crothers argument against black hole theory is irrefutable!! Again I say it stems from negative numbers under squar roots. You can check it in the formular for gravitational time dilation see to it that beyond event horizon, we have a square root of a negative number!! If you accept that beyond the event horizon, an object can get there, despite the square root of the negative number, then you are saying that a ston that actually reached your head actually went up to moon just because mathematicaly we have a solution for such an height as a negative number under a square root!!!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 12:09pm

  

  But if you cannot solve it, I can still guide you this way: If you throw a stone upwards, it traces something like a parabolic path. There is an height above which the stone cannot get. But in the maths of parabolas one can talk as though the stone can go up forever! Solving for such an height involves taking square root of a negative number (try that in your calculator).
  So whenever we see a negative number under a square root, we know that such a state, described by that math is not attainable. In the case of black hole, time dillation, leght contraction etc becomes negative numbers under square roots, for things supposedly beyond the event horizon. Therefore blackholes are unattainable!
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 28, 2021 at 11:41am

  Can you solve the quadratic equation: x^2+x+1=0, and plot the graph y=x^2+x+1?? If you can, I will show you in a quick way why black hole theory is wrong maths.
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:47pm

  'Material' is also problematic. Is light not 'matterial'? This word is ill-defined. I like to just say 'the seen world'. Then yes, the seen is the condition of the unseen
• 

  Roaring Lovely February 27, 2021 at 8:44pm

  I don't believe Black holes exist at all! As far as I can check, they are based on unsound mathematics!