Where Science End And Scientism Begines

It is not clear at all to many that somewhere science stops and then holus bolus, like an eagle snartching a chick, another impostor not any different from religion sits squarely on the throne. So here, I am going to elucidate the difference between science and 'scientism'. Here, I use science just to mean 'the collection of objective knowledge' and 'scientism' as 'the beleif in science theories'.The scientific shell gamer has two hats out of which to pull out the rabbit. When the unsuspecting lay man asks what science is, a trivial example is given. 'Science' is such processes like testing the claim that if I release an apple, it will fall to the ground. Good! The layman get accustomed with the notion that science is a collection of facts. But when you check the pockets of the snake oil pedler, you find another card! 'Science' is also inferances made by interlectuals in Berkeley or Copenhagen!Scientism is a religion around science that is pretending to be factual. It is not scence. It is 'about science'. This is worst because a lay person is never taught science in books or journals. He just read about science and he thinks that this constitutes knowing science. What is in the mind of a lay man is what I may term it as 'eureka claims'. Just the yawns from a tired nobel prize winner. People develope religion 'eurekah claims' and then argue for hours and days!Eureka! Man came from apesEureka! Give me the speed and the momentum of every particle, and I will predict everything in futureEureka! We leave in a four dimensional spacetime continuumEureka! Give me a long beam and I will balance the earth. And other stupid claims.Scientism is about making and/or unmaking beleifs. Scientism is about changing how you think with the suspection that someone comming from Harvard can think better than you. Scientism tells you what to beleif. You better beleive so because nobel prize winners, celebrities and a basketfull of similarly indoctrinated scientists beleive so. Scientism is about group thinking and peer preasure. A claim is a fact because many scientists beleive so. Likewise a claim is not a fact because many scientists donnot beleive. Scientism has swaped science with a priesthood.So every time you read an article beginning with:a)Most scientists beleive that...b)The prevailing view is that...d)The consensus is that...Donnot even read further! You can be sure that you are in for yet another Jehovah Witness on his door to door mission! Wikipedia articles are notorius at this in beginning sesions, but not in all articles. Finaly Wikipedia settles down and says the science. So Wikipedia is often good somewhere around last sessions. But it surely often begine or end in sheer scientism. Let put it on perspective, to a seeker of truth, who gives a shit about preveiling views, consensuses and what scientists beleive or doubt? This concerns the minds and not the issues. Only psychologists or psychiatrists should be interested with such.THE TRUE SCIENCE TEACHERHe is often less impresive but he imparts more. The lesson can be boring but you get something that will bring jow afterwards but not DURING THE LESSON. Those who seek quick entertainment during the lesson ends up becomming the victim of the scientism sways. While the scientism preacher donnot even need to have understood what he is preaching, a true science teacher need to have himself first mastered the lesson before he teaches others.A science teacher will NEVER begine by beating about the bush on how the theory has been proven over and over and how many scientists, people etc beleive in it. This are the hallmarks of soul winners seeking to recruite you to a new religion. The teacher wants you to think critically and to question the theory. He wants you to arrive at your own conclusion albeit based on knowledge of the facts around the theory.So the real teacher goes straight away and opens the nuts and bolts. He does not tell you that 'it is proven'. He stops at showing you how it was alegedly proven and leaves you to arrive at your own conclusion as to whether or not the proof was conclusive. He for instance stop at drawing and illustrating the apparatus, showing the maths if there and leaves you either to judge it for yourself or for you to go and carry out your own experiment. He knows that science is not about blind faith that include beleiving it because 'everybody' beleivs. Or in a poetic summary, a true teacher does tell students what is in a dark room. He stops at turning on the lights for everyone in the room to see it for themselves.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
 Blessings, to our dear Earth Family. We thank you for connecting with us.As you enter your month of November, the universe is set to spark transformative energies that promise significant shifts in your lives. These next few of your weeks, will be…
5 hours ago
Ꮙℓἇ∂ἇ.. ኔጡ። left a comment on Comment Wall
"Well why not if thats the race who your in contact with,and you want it to be known then let them turn up and show face..if it helps with full disclosure..they could come in a disguise or send a human representative ground crew member if need be.."
5 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"How about a Tau Ceti pilot-9 feet tall and are akin to earth bears or wookies appear on the Capitol steps?
Chuckle cheese Schumer would soil his boxer shorts- that would be funny"
5 hours ago
Ꮙℓἇ∂ἇ.. ኔጡ። left a comment on Comment Wall
"Your just throwing excuses now, you don't want full disclosure at all.. its rather obvious.. your meant to be there to represent your ET race not stand shouting in the background on this site. where no one hears you... there is collective vibe so…"
8 hours ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes, contemplating that suggestion would be highly appreciated…Thanks..👍🏻"
8 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Just imagine Vlada working for NZ intel..?? He's naive, plain and simple...There are good insiders in the US military, who want the truth out and have found themselves punished for attempting to assist the UAP committee...The rug gets pulled....And…"
8 hours ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Vlada, would you also expect a CIA agent to spill all of their secrets?… Probably not, as some things are simply classified.. Full disclosure is awaiting an increase in the collectives vibes. We are directed by our Senior Global Officer and the GFL…"
8 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Well Vlada...A Congress full of dark cabal minions, is not fertile ground, upon which to plant seeds....One does not cast pearls before swine....One waits for new and more receptive people, who TRULY seek answers....Not mischief makers, trying to…"
9 hours ago
More…