What Realy Might Be Going On In CERN?

It was predictable that physicists would eventually be regarded as devil worshipers or some other fanatics. On the largest part, the bozos termed experts have themselves to blame. They sell physics cans with different information on the can pertaining what is inside the can. The can pic has rice, when you open the can, you find worms.The whole problem comes about when lay people buy into physics jargon as energy, space, time, dimension, vibration, resonance etc without caring much to know what these terms mean in physics. For instance, do physicist use the word 'energy' to rifer to a ghost? Do they use it to lable a vague mystery boiling somewhere in his head when he lacks any better word?The even more formidable word in this case is 'dimension'. It has become a chewing gum in the mouths of mystics. It is an abrakadabra of a word use to explain everything and to understand nothing. Like a woshing eagle, the mystic snarched the word off the physicist's mouth, concocted his own meaning, then whenever he hears a physicist utter the word, his buttocks rises up and down. Are they at long last discovering the holy grail of mysticism: multidimensional reality? What he does is quote the physicist use 'dimension' but off the context.So yes, physicists at CERN are indead trying to check if other dimensions exists. But the word 'dimension' does not mean the mystic one: the seat of evil spirits. While 'dimension' is full of fantasies in mystics, it is trivial in physics. If there is another dimension, out of it, angels won't appear. You will get the same same boring particles buzzing in: bosons, gluons, photons. So if you are not interested with these 'ons', leave the physics's version of 'multidimensional reality' to particle physicists.WHAT EXACTLY IS DIMENSIONHere is where we must force the professor to stop pointing to that picture in the can and open the can. Space dimensions are any of the axi that are all mutualy perpendicular to each other. When you try to construct these, from a glance, you find that you can't get to fit more than 3 lines this way. So incase we want to squize another? At once, our physicist exchange the hat and then try to pull the rabbit. You are now taken on a tour to the world of a paper. 'Space' morphs from a concept into a solid on the table. It can now imprison some bedbugs and prevent them from seeing the '3rd dimension'. But unfortunately, we cannot see ANALOGIES in the laboratory, we see the ACTUAL thing and the few intelligent guys in the back there will go murmuring. They know that professor realy has to stop at illustrating WHAT HE WILL SEE in the laboratory more than WHAT HE WILL NOT SEE there.Or do you think this can realy happen? Use analogies to illustrate and use the real world to prove what we cannot illustrate in the real world?? Of course we have to stand with a club ready in the hand. Before our guy ask for money to build a huge behemoth as CERN, he must tell us what exactly he is going to SEE there. Not what he is going to INFERE with his futile reasoning. Then when you corner the guy this way, he now illustrate the goose, not the golden eggs. You realise that all he will see are events going in in 100% 3d world. So our professors tell us that 3d events plus unsubstanciated opinions=multidimensional reality!NON EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRYBut must the fourth dimension etc resort that directions we cannot even, in principle, point to them? The answer is naughtah! This is particularly sharp when we have in mind how string theory will eventualy explain the invisibility of the seven dimensions; their compactification and SMALLNESS rather than their ORIENTATIONS. The extradimensions are said to curl like epididimis. Clearly, physicists are treating 'dimensions' as PHYSICAL OBJECTS, sort of like strings!!It may come to you as a surprise to learn that we can draw all the lines such that they are all visible and that they are infact more than 3! The trick is that geometry need not be EUCLIDEAN. It is the fifth euclid's postulate that limits how much dimensions we think a paper has. It says you can but draw only one line through a given point parallel to a given line. This in turn mean that we can but draw only one line that is perpendicular to a given line in a 2D paper. The point is that we challenge this by showing that we understand the MEASURE of 'perpendicular' a posteriori but not a priori and that our measuring instruments can contract or expand depending on where they are in space creating illusion that a paper is 2d when it is infact 3d!HOW STRING THEORY ARRIVES AT 12 etcEventually it is the KINETIC energy of the vibrating string (having no potential energy). However, this ought be tricky cause we know that conservation of kinetic energy is expressible as mc^2=mv^2 mu^2, which is cunningly like a PYTHAGOREAN RELATIONSHIP, hence the mere need to have 12 distinct strings each moving at a generaly unique speed, when we sum their kinetic energies satisfies the same equation as a single, 12d string regardless of how it might be oriented in space!!HOW TO 'PROVE' MORE THAN 3DWe just exermin the energy of photon to see if it exeeds mc^2 mvx^2 mvy^2 wvz^2, of which we find that we have to make the assumption that we are dealing with a SINGLE string and not a SET of them. If there are infact 12 such strings, or just 12 LEVELS OF VIBRATIONS of such as string, then the string will satisfy the equation even if it were infact 1D, let alone 3d!
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Edward posted a status
the public enemy.......
1 hour ago
Sirian Starlight left a comment on Comment Wall
"So, what is ascension exactly?

We talk about this at length, seriously great length but we don't define the process from a linear point of view. And, honestly I think if we did, we'd start to reclaim a lot about who we are in the process. Because,…"
3 hours ago
Sirian Starlight replied to Sirian Starlight's discussion Debate: Me Versus You, And The Solution That Matters
"Yes, self realization is the first step towards multi-self coharmony and I believe it's the central point of focus between balanced chakras, and chakras in balance. a crossroads of mutual importance either way, for an energy nexus gate to stabilize…"
13 hours ago
Sirian Starlight replied to Sirian Starlight's discussion Debate: Me Versus You, And The Solution That Matters
"I updated this thread with more information.

In truth this is a mission calling more so than a debate at this point, but it will happen in stages. And both are highly needed and relevant to today's future for tomorrow's promise of one to build a…"
13 hours ago
Movella replied to Sirian Starlight's discussion Debate: Me Versus You, And The Solution That Matters
"The answer is self-realisation. I choose this path whether I have people behind me or not, because I know it to be true. Blessings.🪷"
13 hours ago
Sirian Starlight posted a discussion
In short, I need your help to change the future. But first, you need to understand how I got to this point, and more specifically, why a solution for this longstanding issue can become real and is truly needed, to help us move forward with ascension…
14 hours ago
Movella left a comment on Comment Wall
"Nothing was ever lost, we had all simply forgotten who we were for a while. We are all divine sparks of the same Creator.
This piece that I’ve never heard concluded a meeting I was in this morning, and the lyrics resonate with that truth. The era of…"
15 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Posted on 06/29/2026 by EraOfLightYou often ask yourselves whether you have fallen in love.But what if you have not fallen at all?What if you have risen?What if this love was never created by another person, but had always been there, quietly…
16 hours ago
More…