Spiritual Blogs

What Realy Might Be Going On In CERN?

Posted by Roaring Lovely on December 11, 2015 at 6:30am
It was predictable that physicists would eventually be regarded as devil worshipers or some other fanatics. On the largest part, the bozos termed experts have themselves to blame. They sell physics cans with different information on the can pertaining what is inside the can. The can pic has rice, when you open the can, you find worms.The whole problem comes about when lay people buy into physics jargon as energy, space, time, dimension, vibration, resonance etc without caring much to know what these terms mean in physics. For instance, do physicist use the word 'energy' to rifer to a ghost? Do they use it to lable a vague mystery boiling somewhere in his head when he lacks any better word?The even more formidable word in this case is 'dimension'. It has become a chewing gum in the mouths of mystics. It is an abrakadabra of a word use to explain everything and to understand nothing. Like a woshing eagle, the mystic snarched the word off the physicist's mouth, concocted his own meaning, then whenever he hears a physicist utter the word, his buttocks rises up and down. Are they at long last discovering the holy grail of mysticism: multidimensional reality? What he does is quote the physicist use 'dimension' but off the context.So yes, physicists at CERN are indead trying to check if other dimensions exists. But the word 'dimension' does not mean the mystic one: the seat of evil spirits. While 'dimension' is full of fantasies in mystics, it is trivial in physics. If there is another dimension, out of it, angels won't appear. You will get the same same boring particles buzzing in: bosons, gluons, photons. So if you are not interested with these 'ons', leave the physics's version of 'multidimensional reality' to particle physicists.WHAT EXACTLY IS DIMENSIONHere is where we must force the professor to stop pointing to that picture in the can and open the can. Space dimensions are any of the axi that are all mutualy perpendicular to each other. When you try to construct these, from a glance, you find that you can't get to fit more than 3 lines this way. So incase we want to squize another? At once, our physicist exchange the hat and then try to pull the rabbit. You are now taken on a tour to the world of a paper. 'Space' morphs from a concept into a solid on the table. It can now imprison some bedbugs and prevent them from seeing the '3rd dimension'. But unfortunately, we cannot see ANALOGIES in the laboratory, we see the ACTUAL thing and the few intelligent guys in the back there will go murmuring. They know that professor realy has to stop at illustrating WHAT HE WILL SEE in the laboratory more than WHAT HE WILL NOT SEE there.Or do you think this can realy happen? Use analogies to illustrate and use the real world to prove what we cannot illustrate in the real world?? Of course we have to stand with a club ready in the hand. Before our guy ask for money to build a huge behemoth as CERN, he must tell us what exactly he is going to SEE there. Not what he is going to INFERE with his futile reasoning. Then when you corner the guy this way, he now illustrate the goose, not the golden eggs. You realise that all he will see are events going in in 100% 3d world. So our professors tell us that 3d events plus unsubstanciated opinions=multidimensional reality!NON EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRYBut must the fourth dimension etc resort that directions we cannot even, in principle, point to them? The answer is naughtah! This is particularly sharp when we have in mind how string theory will eventualy explain the invisibility of the seven dimensions; their compactification and SMALLNESS rather than their ORIENTATIONS. The extradimensions are said to curl like epididimis. Clearly, physicists are treating 'dimensions' as PHYSICAL OBJECTS, sort of like strings!!It may come to you as a surprise to learn that we can draw all the lines such that they are all visible and that they are infact more than 3! The trick is that geometry need not be EUCLIDEAN. It is the fifth euclid's postulate that limits how much dimensions we think a paper has. It says you can but draw only one line through a given point parallel to a given line. This in turn mean that we can but draw only one line that is perpendicular to a given line in a 2D paper. The point is that we challenge this by showing that we understand the MEASURE of 'perpendicular' a posteriori but not a priori and that our measuring instruments can contract or expand depending on where they are in space creating illusion that a paper is 2d when it is infact 3d!HOW STRING THEORY ARRIVES AT 12 etcEventually it is the KINETIC energy of the vibrating string (having no potential energy). However, this ought be tricky cause we know that conservation of kinetic energy is expressible as mc^2=mv^2 mu^2, which is cunningly like a PYTHAGOREAN RELATIONSHIP, hence the mere need to have 12 distinct strings each moving at a generaly unique speed, when we sum their kinetic energies satisfies the same equation as a single, 12d string regardless of how it might be oriented in space!!HOW TO 'PROVE' MORE THAN 3DWe just exermin the energy of photon to see if it exeeds mc^2 mvx^2 mvy^2 wvz^2, of which we find that we have to make the assumption that we are dealing with a SINGLE string and not a SET of them. If there are infact 12 such strings, or just 12 LEVELS OF VIBRATIONS of such as string, then the string will satisfy the equation even if it were infact 1D, let alone 3d!
Views: 32
E-mail me when people leave their comments –
Follow

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Latest Blog Posts

Most Popular Blog Posts

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Message from commander Valiant Thor. The Timeline War and the Trump Paradox; Frequencies of the Future [videos] Starship Earth: The Big Picture.
WHAT YOU ARE SEEING IS NOT CHAOS, IT IS COORDINATION The events reported over the last days of March are not random disruptions. They are synchronized operations happening across multiple layers of the global system. Power interruptions. Transport…
See More
1 hour ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
Divine Union, Within and Without; By Jenny Schiltz | Source.
Posted on 03/26/2026 by EraOfLightWe are at the end of a very long cycle. For a long time, humanity has lived in a SPLIT. There were periods where life was more connected to the feminine, to the body, to intuition, to the natural rhythms of life…
See More
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's blog post Ivy and Drekx Discuss The Knights Templar and Biblical Ark of The Covenant
"AE asked: "Drexk-was the ark empty?"

Drekx reply: Basically, it's ancient Atlantean technology, used by the Egyptians of Moses' time, which he was privy to......In modern parlance, we have these and we describe them as Small Modular Reactors…"
12 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Basically, it's ancient Atlantean technology, used by the Egyptians of Moses' time, which he was privy to......In modern parlance, we have these and we describe them as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)...And why the guardians who watch over the Ark in…"
12 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"Drexk-was the ark empty?"
13 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes Movella-but I was out in Arizona outside of flagstaff and one night we went up into the hills where its mostly desert and it was as if we were encased inside a dome full of stars-I had never seen that and was stunned."
13 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's video
"97% of Earth human genetic code, is described by modern scientists on Earth, as so-called "junk" DNA...BUT it awaits specific triggers to activate it's function and is far from junk...It displays all the mathematical properties of a complex…"
13 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"The story of the Ark of the Covenant, as well as the pre-ice age civilisation, is discussed here in this vid, filmed last Christmas, an interview of Graham Hancock, by Piers Morgan.....Even a natural cynic such as Morgan, finds Graham's researches…"
14 hours ago
More…

New Forum Posts