Time Does Not Pass

"I think I know what a clock is, therefore I know what time is" EinsteinDoes this show that Albert was smart, or does this show that he could not differentiate the concept of breakfast from toast he munches every morning?Of course Einstein was a champion of the 'passage of time' cult. It was unwittingly invented by mathematical physicists as a convinient poem but it was Einstein who tried to litteralise. Time, however does not pass for the simple reason that we must not allow it. We use the word 'pass' LITERALY. We call a spade a spade.PASS: For an object to enjoy this propety, we need another object standing, call it P. Then we need at least 3 locations lieing along straight line, A, B and C. Let B be in the midle of A and C. Let P be at B. Then we say that an object has passed by P if it was at location A at one moment and at location C at some other moment afterwards.If this way, Einstein and Minkowski had taken time to understand 'pass', they would easily realise that 'passage of time' is a ridiculus idea. They didn't do such. Neither do many try. It is belitling for guys in university to warm the floor by revisiting kindagarten. They deal with EFGH, so they might as well forget ABCD. Here, in universities, we deal with lagrangians, hamiltonians, curved spaces etc. We need no such nagging questions as definitions of words.TIME DOES NOT CHANGEA not too distant cousin of 'passing time' is the equaly ridiculus 'change in time'. Again we only need a tour back to kindagarten.CHANGE: An object is said to change if it has one characteristic at one moment and then it has some other characteristic at some other moment afterward.So it is the onus of the proponent of 'changing time' to show us what colour time had yesterday and what color it has today. Of course if time is a clock, as said by Einstein, this is not hard to show. But then what comes of his lofty 'time dillations' and 'time bending'. Of course clocks will bend under strong gravitantional pull. This was known even before Newton. Then to illustrate 'time dillation', all you need is to use a clock with an old battery. Do you beleive this? Are these basic kindagarten stuffs that sends pple sound waaahs and aaaahs when they hear 'time dillation'? I don't think so. They confuse the time which does not pass with the stupid clock in the pocket of a mathematical physicist. But it is not their fault. It is only when cornered by a smart person do Einstein admit that he is talking solely about clocks!TIME AS A FIELDThis is precisely the understanding of mathematical physics. However, they hardly teach this way to the ley people. It requires one to be farmiliar with the language used in Maxwell's theory. The space around a bar magnet is full of imaginary tiny magnetometers. We ask: what would a real magnetometer indicate at that region? Similarly, the space of relativity is riddled with invisible clocks trains and rulers. This is what is called spacetime. Its too bad that the ley person thinks that it is an harmock that supports the earth like a tortoise ready to turtle all the way 'down'.To understand this very well, recal that to argue that time does not change, I had to define 'change' by resorting to different moments. My point is that 'change' is not the mere synonym of 'different states' but a whole sentense need to be constracted to define the word 'change'. We cannot use the same analogy that: different states of coin=>change in coin, then different moments=>change in time. To refute this, we only need to show that the fact that there are different planets does not mean that anything changed to bring about the differences.So then the die hard advocate of the devil will have to construct a whole sentence: time changes in that different moments occur at different moments. But this is internally inconsistent for the simple reason that it uses the word 'moment' twice in a sentense with two contradictory meanings. It is at this point where Minkowski escapes to hook once and for all by admitting that the first 'moment' is not the same as the second. By so doing, he declares that there are two 'times', the so called PROPER TIME and the COORDINATE TIME.So then 'change in time' of Minkowsk is not realy self riferential. The guy merely has two clocks. One is on the table and the other one is hiding in his sleeve to be used only when cornered. To the careless laypeople, he can still convince them that time changes by merely pointing at the ticking clock. To the carefull guy, he needs an OBJECTIVE proof that the two ticks are realy occuring at the different moments. Then he pulls out his 'proper time' out of the sleeve. You see? This is the true clock, if the other ticks were at the same moment, this other clock would indicate so. Round and round we add the tortoises of clocks. It turtles all the way round!Having said this, it might now be tempting to think that when I say that time does not change, or pass, I mean that different moments of time all occur at the same moment in some other time frame we might term 'proper time'. Indead such is what Minkowski would mean by 'time stopping in the black hole' or that there was no time before big bang, but this is not what I mean. In my case, where I call a spade a spade, it merely leads to the next question: do time ocur? I say nope! And indead this is the major reason I disagree that time changes. Recall that in my definition of 'change', I use properties. It then follows that that which lacks properties cannot be termed to changes. Moments are neither things nor properties of things. They are more akin to prepositions.

"Being open minded is one thing, following & believing a conspiracy theorist who lies is another entirely.. he's a con man has been charged in court for his lies even its cost him a lot of money and yet he still keeps trying to fool people online."

"Why do you follow Alex Jones he's a goon conspiracy theorist!! , have you not learnt anything from all his BS reports..and arrest & charges for his lies.."

Interstellar Object Is Spraying Something Weird, Scientists FindA new analysis of our solar system’s interstellar interloper, 3I/ATLAS, reveal that it’s spewing huge amounts of water — and astronomers can’t immediately explain why.The object, which…

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Comments

Feather Winger December 27, 2015 at 6:38pm

§§§§
Roaring Lovely December 27, 2015 at 2:10pm

Yes but time is in the denominator of change. That is to say even when the change amounts to zero, we conceptualise such with the help of the concept of time.
Roaring Lovely December 27, 2015 at 2:09pm

Yes but time is in the denominator of change. That is to say even when the change amounts to zero, we conceptualise such with the help of the concept of time.
Feather Winger December 27, 2015 at 1:42pm

Time is a concept...a way of thinking....a way of measuring change...

This reply was deleted.

Spiritual Blogs

Time Does Not Pass

Comments

Latest Blog Posts

THE MESSAGE OF AQUARIUS-CHAPTER-XXXIII

Interstellar Object 31/Atlas Is Releasing hydroxyl gas (OH), a byproduct of water

Alex Jones Tested For Implantable Microchips / Self-Assembling Nanotech!

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Blog Posts

FINALLY THE NEW PAPA SAID IT ! Killing Easter lamb has no basis in the Christian tradition

How Many of These 51 Spiritual Awakening Symptoms Do You Have?

find out if you are a star seed and where you really come from tests.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

I Am The Way, The Truth, & The Life - An Alternate PerspectiveBy Vicky Wills

Many Have Been Misled ~ The Oracle ~ Chellea Wilder

From Mother Mary For You Now🌹By Melanie Beckler

How to Step Out of the Story of Age By Octavia Vasile

Note: this page contains paid content.