When I visited Ubuntu HQ, I was absolutely shocked to my core, to see that one of their 'manifesto' proposals, was to stock the stream below their property with over a million trout - 'so that people would have a food source'. So when did they get the authority to take over from Gaia? What about all the other creatures in the stream? How would that effect the natural balance? Is it not obvious? The proof has been, that because of this general low level of consciousness, that when new technologies are introduced, there's scant regard for the natural harmony of the biosphere.
Have you ever managed an organic garden? Have you ever witnessed at close quarter, how the natural balance wants to play itself out - without trying to control it? All other life - like the slugs and the bugs, the ants and the aphids - play their part. Original Humanity was seeded from the Hominids - and meant to live a balanced forager-gatherer lifestyle - consuming only where there was sufficient, and tending to move from place to place. It was the Intervention that hybridised him into Homo Sapiens: adapted him to consume meat and dairy; then created Industrial Agriculture, which has torn the eco-systems apart. There can be no harmony unless we give the rein back to Mother Nature.
The Venus project, Ubuntu and the Thrive movement, are overlooking this natural balance - they have plans to create a new balance - but not really considering the natural harmony of life. This is what I mean when I said the system will likely reorder itself, but morph into something similar because the majority have not yet processed their karma. All of these movements are being inspired from behind karmic veils: the distortion that thinks it's right for the small 'I' to run the show. Rather than connecting with the divine, and trusting in the flow, that the right things will happen by embodying and infusing the divine out into the world.
'Humanity is currently consuming 1.5 times what the Earth can provide' - this is often quoted. But even this is a misunderstanding. It's based on what an already controlled Earth is providing - it doesn't consider the degree of replenishment that is necessary and neither does it take into account the amount of land that the plant and animal kingdoms need to provide that. In a truly balanced system, large areas must be left fallow, in order to be replenished. This doesn't happen in the current system, where the top-soils are being depleted through over-farming. It's like saying because the supermarket shelves are stacked and have been providing so many tonnes of food per day, we don't have to consider the over all depletion of the biosphere - essentially we're cashing blank cheques. It's like the Central reserve creating paper money, but not linked to any reserves in the bank. Even if that rate of consumption was reduced just to what the Earth can immediately provide, humanity would need to spread out across the surface area of 10 Earths, living as he was meant to: forager-gathering from the natural provision of the eco-systems.
A lot of these movements are well intentioned, and I can feel the compassion, but there's still too much ego involved and not enough selflessness: thinking it's up to us to control the environment. Quite simply, it is not. Only those who truly get this, and surrender to the realigning flow, will have any chance of ascending into 5D Earth. In order to go forwards to the future, we must go backwards to balanced harmony.
Comments