No, Physicists Don't Understand Light

After Newton amused himself that light was nothing but whizzing corpuscles, he immediately realized that he had just opened a fresh can of worms. Why then don't we see light as just that, speeding corpuscles? Why do we see a 'static' bright colors? This seems to be the question that bothered him when he said that 'we don't have a clue as to how the brain creates the phantasm of colors'. Like many people, especially after him, he erroneously concluded that 'color is a phantasm created by the brain'. He cared less to find evidence for that. Maybe if he found it, he would check how the brain does this wonder!

First note that we can't realy separate 'color' from 'light'. A 'colorless light' will not appear as light at all! So when someone delegates colors to the brain, he has actually delegated the whole thing to the brain. In effect, he denies what we thought he was going to explain! Light, he says, is a 'who knows how the brain creats illusions from impingings and/or vibrations'. But then as 'evidence' that his theory is correct, he points to the very same thing he is also trying to deny! Light must be particles, Newton insisted, because we see that the very light is collimated. In other words according to what Newton gives as evidence for his corpuscles theory of light, if light is ever whizzing corpuscles, then the corpuscles themselves are made of light! We need light to understand light!

The erroneous philosophy Newton unwittingly spearheaded comes because many people (Newton included ) tends to confuse 'existence' with 'spatio temporal presence'. Below I will elucidate on 'spatio temporal presence'. A corpuscle is 'spatially present' in that it is 'somewhere in space'. A moving corpuscles is ' temporaly present' in that it exist in a given location in a fraction of a second. So how a corpuscle can be said to exist is supposed to be easy to realize. So saying that 'light is moving corpuscles' is supposed to help us understand how such a thing can exist 'out there' simply because existence 'out there' is, according to them, the same thing as 'spatio-temporal presence'. But this philosophy is erroneous!

On one hand, Newton did correctly note that there is an analogy between light and speeding corpuscles. But he erred in thinking that this analogy will help him unlock the secret of light. He was supposed to also consider a case where the analogy would help him unlock the secret of movement of corpuscles. In other words he should not have presumed that we can understand movement by just looking at a moving object, if we cannot understand light by just looking at a blazing torch. I know this approach requires some boldness! Then he would be lead to the better idea that the mind reconstruct both movement and light from a deeper, more fundamental reality. This way, it becomes a bit easier to figure out how 'the brain generates the phantasm of colors from the impingings and/or vibrations due speeding corpuscles'. It does so in 'who knows how it might also creat an illusion of motion from colors'.

Notice also that we realy cannot form an idea of object without light! In 'spatio-temporal' sense, we might be tempted to define 'object' as 'that which has a shape'. But 'shape' in turn is defined by the finitness of the region out from which light is emitted or reflected. The concept of an object without light will be absolutely colourless and thus indistinguishable from the empty background! So to understand an object, we must first understand light! So the idea that 'light is speeding corpuscles' is circular! literally, it means 'light is speeding specks of light'!!

The same reasoning (mutasis mutandis) can also be applied to the idea that light is a wave. The evidence that a physicist offers is the famous 'double slit experiment'. He points to alternative patterns of 'brightness' and 'darkness' and then tells you that this shows that light is a wave! The blue light has different spacings from the red light etc. But when you close examine, you find that you are already seeing a 'blue' thing etc! If light is a wave, then the evidence indicates that it is a 'wave of light' itself! The light waves by rapidly changing its brightness throughout the space! So wave is more of what light does than what it is! Again the reasoning is circular! Saying that color blue is 'a wave of a certain frequency' is actually saying that color blue is the 'rapid alteration of the color blue'! We need the color to understand the color!

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community


  • Exactly. Light is always a shade away from uncovering another one. It's the eternal mirror.
  • Yes, since even gamma rays are still photons, albeit the more energetic one. The gamma rays affects the DNA to the extent of damaging it. But the usual light still do affect DNA and other chemicals in cells. In fact there is now a field called 'bio-photons'. Cells do emit and absorbs photons. They use it for communication! So the picture of only neuronal communication is incomplete.
  • This is because of what they generate along their journey being reflected back into the matter or state of elemental being we embody. This is essentially how nutrients from the sun enter into plant life.
  • Human DNA can be influenced by light photons and vice versa......You might find this video of interest.. Note that we are all more than observers of creation, we are the actual creators of it....Co-creators...
  • Light is presence through vision. A mirror of itself reflecting its journey from its current state of form to how it came into being. This cycle repeats itself in everything that colour embraces.
  • A quantum physicist points at a screen and asks you to watch a movie of how photons creates interference pattern. He then tells you that this shows that light is a wave! But when you close-examine, even with a powerful microscopes, you don't miss to notice that the tiny dots forming the pattern are just tiny specks of light. If you were studying a blue light, every one of those specks is a blue light! So does their explanation makes any sense? Is light a wave-like pattern created by tiny specks of light? Do we need light to understand light?

    Of course this explanation of theirs is bogus! The wave is how the light behaves not what light is. Perhaps there is another, invisible wave that, for some reasons, always accompany the light. But light is not a wave!
This reply was deleted.

Copyright Policy: Always Include 30-50% of the source material and a link to the original article. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. If you believe that someone's work has been copied and posted on Ashtar Command in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please Contact Us and include the links to these pages and relevant info. 

Latest Activity

Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's blog post Violet Eyes...? - It's A Bit Shocking, But Interesting
"The sun had a type of "heart attack" in 1972....The first since the "fall" to limited consciousness, on Earth, one half a precessional cycle ago..
The sun is actually the heart centre, for the great being that ensouls this Solarian system....Lord…"
55 minutes ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
1 hour ago
AlternateEarth posted a discussion
The CCP and the PLA getting ready for war on their own people first then an invasion of the US
2 hours ago
RandyFirstContact commented on Drekx Omega's blog post Violet Eyes...? - It's A Bit Shocking, But Interesting
"Amazing contact Drekx. I have not heard of any similar experience in the contactee field. So much to explore here. But I did have a couple of questions.

I was curious, you said Sandara had to attend to an emergency regarding solar guardianship. How…"
3 hours ago
rev.joshua skirvin posted a blog post
I wasn’t going to do a long post today but there I was, unable to stem the flow. What I DO want to share is the update Gene Decode did with Nicholas Veniamin. Nick let Gene run with it and he did a marathon; non-stop review and updates for one hour…
9 hours ago
Krishna Kalki posted a discussion
Well it's there you see it now you don't ..imagine the speed like or faster then lightening ..zizzing in the sky @
17 hours ago
Drekx Omega replied to Krishna Kalki's discussion Worlds Largest Telescope Ready To Stare Straight Into The Sun
"☀️Well, maybe it's too much to expect from them, but it would be great if they could see some evidence, that the sun is a living organ and beating heart, for our solar system...."
17 hours ago
Krishna Kalki replied to Krishna Kalki's discussion Worlds Largest Telescope Ready To Stare Straight Into The Sun
"Let’s see what it sees"
18 hours ago