Mathematical Physics Is Ultimately Based On Fallacious Reasoning

And perharps modern science as a whole! This is not to say that mathematical physics is not helpfull at all, no no no! It is a pack of valid description of the world. Be attentive with your club in your hand. When the physicist points to an experiment set up, take notes. When he calculates the paths and tragectories, take the equation. When he begines to INFERE invisible things, release the club on the numbskull! This latter case is where mathematical physics squarely joins the folder of RELIGION. (and I am not saying religion is bad, it is PERSONAL)When you zoom in the lense from ever since the work of Newton on gravity (not the 3 'laws' of motion), mathematical physicists have been trying to tell you that intellectual reasoning from equations is the same thing as reality. They say because flies like $hit so much, discovering a bull'$hit out there in the field is the same thing as discovering flies, including invisible ones. The sect encountered a dramatic turn in the works James Clerk Maxwell. Eventually, mathematical physics is been perfected into a full blown religion through string theory.To put my complain in summary, deriving a conclusion from a set of premises and then 'proving' the conclusion does not mean that the premises are correct. Neither do they even mean that the premises have any bearing in reality. Lets look at an examplei)I have 20 oranges in the mouthii)I have 20 oranges in my handiii)Therefore if I spit out the oranges and place them on the table, there would be a total of 40 oranges on the tableSo this is now what the theory 'predict'! Of course this is a mesmerism and if some experimentalist now finds 40 oranges on the table, it will be anounced from the roofs that infact it is possible to place 20 oranges in the mouth!Of course the advocate of the devil will claim that my analogy fails to capture mathematical physics method. The theory, it is said, need to be tested over and over. So let me give one which will pass all the tests.i)All cars have gear switchesii)cars alter the sound when we switch gearsiii)Whenever cars aproach a hill, there is a high probability that the drivers will switch gears.iv)Therfore there is a high probability that any car will alter how they sound as they approach a hill.This prediction will pass all the tests even if all cars in the road have automatic transmition systems. Such is how nature pee on inferances that are tested for 1000 years and found to be true! Beginning from a premise, drawing a conclusion, testing the conclusion (which is dubed 'prediction') over and over, wrong footed us when it comes to unlocking the secreat of how cars works. Yet it is this '$hit is the same as flies reasoning' fuell that propels the engine to the most ridiculus religion ever concocted by a human being.So you might have guessed where the problem lies. There is not always necesarily one way of deriving a correct conclution. Infact, there are countless of ways and mathematics is even worse in spewing endless ways. So they often use a technique termed Occam's Razor. However, this is even a more ridiculus criteria! It is said that the simplest explanation should be taken, nonsense! Is it lazing through explanations that we want or UNDERSTANDING reality? In our case above, if we regard a human being as part of the car system, we will choose the automatic transmission and even conclude that we need no sentient being to understand the car. Then we wonder why the car seems cleverer than it should be!One other thing is that there is a deep problem with 'prediction'. This is even worse when personalities, prestige and careers are involved. The reason is that when we predict something, we tend to see only evidence that confirms the prediction and trivialise, deny or ignore those that donnot fit the theory. Prediction works just like mesmerism. And while the mathematical physicists mock astrologers for not being open to falsifications, they too cannot possibly be immune to this pitfall that obviously ensnare all humans. Not when big names, fame, money etc are other factors that can sneak in other than the desire to discover.THE HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICSEver since Newton inferred Kepler's 'laws', it was like wow! He pulled the rabbit out of the hat! Physicist close exermined why Newton did it. The idea is that two or more seemingly unrelated mathematical equations can be both derived from a single equation, subject to different boundary/innitial conditions. However, mathematical physicst got obsessed with mathematical structures thinking that this is where the secreat lies. They failed to note the glarring PHYSICAL reason. So it is not a surprise at all that the 'train' boarded by almost every physicist heading to 'holy grail of physics' is infact heading to a city called 'ignorance'!At some point, mathematical physicists decided to persue a baseless speculation. While experiments, so they say, should guide them, there is not a tickle of evidence that suggest that gravity is the same force as electromagnetism. The only 'guide' is that Einstein and other big names were trying the same thing. This exactly where they failed to see the correct reason why Newton, Einstein and Maxwell elegantly succeeded: not that because these guys were genius mathematicians but because the unification was an obvious fact. No sane person can doubt that both of kepler's laws were effects of the same phenomenon: gravity. Therfore it is not a suprise that both laws can be described by a single equation. Same applies to Maxwell's unification. It was already known through the discoveries of Oested and Faraday that electricity and magnetism are corelated while Faraday tried to extend the search for such unity with gravity but failed to find the evidence. So what is the need of a math that unite gravity to electromagnetism?

After denial by the msm and fed gov for over 150 years-now this comes out? Admitting elongated skulls, too. Mythology, folklore and even the Bible tell us that giants once roamed the Earth. And, it turns out, there’s evidence to back this…

A basic conclusion is provided at the end for the uninitiated. U.S. Congressman Hale Boggs was a dissenter of Louisiana Governor Huey P. Long. For those who do not know who he was, Huey P. Long was the politician known as "Kingfish," and he was…

"The surveillance state may be working in Red China, but not so in Great Britain....And here is the proof.....LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQmBIh7WDbk"

Spiritual Blogs

Mathematical Physics Is Ultimately Based On Fallacious Reasoning

Comments

Featured Blogs

Calm In The Midst Of The Storm

Book: ASHTAR – A Tribute Compiled by Tuella

The Fiery Forces Of Creation Are Sweeping The Earth - June 22th, 2022

Interdimensional Being: Where Do You Consciously Reside?

Note: this page contains paid content.

Latest Activity

New Forum Posts

'10-foot-tall people' discovered by archaeologists in Nevada cave

Are Your Thoughts Aligning With What You Wish To Manifest? By Mother Mary Through Octavia Vasile

5D Love Codes & Higher Heart Activation By Jamie Ong

Warning Messages from Aliens: The Earth and a Paradoxical Alternative Timeline

Note: this page contains paid content.