Imagine Standing On A Blackhole

I have been trying to illustrate the problem with 'proof of existence' or even proof in general but I have not been finding a good example. Recently I got an idea: imagine standing on a blackhole and looking up the sky. What will you see?Existence of something is always a concept that help us UNDERSTAND the world. There is no meaning of proving existence whatsoever! However, somewhere on the way, scientists decided to pervert language.THE LION: How do we prove that a thing exist?THE HORSE: By touching, seeing, smelling, hearing and testing it.THE LION: I guess you are still not very smart.:)Rather, 'exist' is a concept we developed to help us UNDERSTAND why we see, test, touch etc. 'proof' is a bit of a misnormer that should not be in our language! 'explain' is the correct alternative! Understanding is the broader picture that encompasses 'knowing'. 'proof' apply in the context of man made concepts, such as 'prove Phythagorus Theorem' but is a useless concept as applied to natural phenomena. In the latter, either a claim is sensible (and often usefull) or not sensless (and often useless). By showing us a UFO, you don't prove anything! you just help us UNDERSTAND well what it might mean to say that UFO exist.Now then let me show you the problem with 'seeing' definition of 'proof of existence'. If you were to try to explain magnetism using the idea of a wind getting sucked to its poles, our misguided physicist will try to judge such an explanation on the basis of whether there is a proof of such a flux! Nope, little does he know that his notion of 'proof' is just 'seeing', which predemands that the flux has additional property of reflecting light, which would render it unsuitable for the job! What he unwittingly, and eroneously assume is that when a region relfect light, that proves that an object is there. As I will elucidate more, this is just as an assumption as assuming that flux exist that goes to the north pole. Both are INDIRECT 'PROOFS' contingent on the assumption (or conception) that nothing cannot affect something.Now lets take our physicists, with their mindset, to a blackhole, have them forget everything and then begine their study of the universe there! So it is a reincarnation. The question is: how much are they going to discover about the universe? It isn't much! They will only 'prove' one obviously wrong thing!Remember that in a blackhole, every light that goes up is boomeranged back at the event horizon. So our physicists will see something reflective in the sky, something like water covering all the sky! Of course it is just a mirage but here on earth, there is what help us to discover a mirage. We often notice that we can pass through the supposed 'water', discovering that it was just an illusion! But things are not so in the event horizon! In the latter, objects too will bounce off from the horizon!LION:So what does it prove your theory of 'water in the sky'?THE HORSE: Doesn't the theory predict that if you throw a stone to the sky it will hit the water and bounce back?Thus the 'predict', 'prove', 'see', 'touch' mindset will lock up the bozos in the abyssmal blackhole of total ignorance, 'knowing' only that some very viscous, highly reflective, wee bit testless, oudorless 'porridge' exist up there in the sky!THE LION: Then you wonder why I say that our physicists are a bunch of morons?
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Copyright Policy: Always Include 30-50% of the source material and a link to the original article. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. If you believe that someone's work has been copied and posted on Ashtar Command in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please Contact Us and include the links to these pages and relevant info.